Clinical and Economic Impact of a Multidisciplinary Follow-Up Program in Lymphoma Patients

Objectives: The UMACOACH Lymphoma is a multidisciplinary monitoring program for patients initiating a first highly haematotoxic treatment for Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Patient follow-up is based on consultation with a pharmacist and planed phone calls by nurses supervised by a clinical haemat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Madeline Devaux, Mathieu Boulin, Morgane Mounier, Denis Caillot, Nuri Ahwij, Adélie Herbin, Jean Noël Bastie, Camille Favennec, Philippine Robert, Pauline Pistre, Stephanie Bost, Pauline Amiot, Laurence Jacquesson, Olivier Casasnovas, Cédric Rossi, Pauline Gueneau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-05-01
Series:Cancers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/14/10/2532
_version_ 1797500954904363008
author Madeline Devaux
Mathieu Boulin
Morgane Mounier
Denis Caillot
Nuri Ahwij
Adélie Herbin
Jean Noël Bastie
Camille Favennec
Philippine Robert
Pauline Pistre
Stephanie Bost
Pauline Amiot
Laurence Jacquesson
Olivier Casasnovas
Cédric Rossi
Pauline Gueneau
author_facet Madeline Devaux
Mathieu Boulin
Morgane Mounier
Denis Caillot
Nuri Ahwij
Adélie Herbin
Jean Noël Bastie
Camille Favennec
Philippine Robert
Pauline Pistre
Stephanie Bost
Pauline Amiot
Laurence Jacquesson
Olivier Casasnovas
Cédric Rossi
Pauline Gueneau
author_sort Madeline Devaux
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: The UMACOACH Lymphoma is a multidisciplinary monitoring program for patients initiating a first highly haematotoxic treatment for Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Patient follow-up is based on consultation with a pharmacist and planed phone calls by nurses supervised by a clinical haematologist. Our objective was to assess effectiveness and cost of the UMACOACH Lymphoma Program (ULP) and to investigate patient satisfaction and quality of life (QoL). Methods: This French monocentric case-control study included all patients enrolled in the ULP over a one-year period (cases) matched with retrospective patients receiving usual care (controls). Numbers of adverse events (AEs), re-hospitalisations, average relative dose intensity (ARDI), treatment response and survival were compared between the two groups. Among cases, patient satisfaction and QoL using the EORTC-QLQC30 questionnaire before and after treatment were evaluated. Results: Seventy-eight cases were matched to 78 controls. Twenty-six percent grade 3–4 AEs were observed in cases versus 38% in controls (<i>p</i> = 0.001). There were 76 and 88 re-hospitalisations in the case and control groups, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.217). ARDI > 85% was observed in 92% and 82% of cases and controls, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.138). No differences were observed in terms of treatment responses and survival. Estimated cost savings were of EUR 81,782 in favour of the case group. An improvement of 5.1 points was observed in the total QoL score before and after treatment in cases. Conclusions: A nurse–pharmacist–haematologist collaboration seems to be promising to reduce grade 3–4 AEs in HL and NHL patients receiving highly haematotoxic chemotherapy regimens. Cost savings from hospitalisation being avoided were also shown.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T03:11:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2131eb2b3f85423ab00cf542fae01369
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-6694
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T03:11:18Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Cancers
spelling doaj.art-2131eb2b3f85423ab00cf542fae013692023-11-23T10:24:31ZengMDPI AGCancers2072-66942022-05-011410253210.3390/cancers14102532Clinical and Economic Impact of a Multidisciplinary Follow-Up Program in Lymphoma PatientsMadeline Devaux0Mathieu Boulin1Morgane Mounier2Denis Caillot3Nuri Ahwij4Adélie Herbin5Jean Noël Bastie6Camille Favennec7Philippine Robert8Pauline Pistre9Stephanie Bost10Pauline Amiot11Laurence Jacquesson12Olivier Casasnovas13Cédric Rossi14Pauline Gueneau15Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital, F-21000 Dijon, FranceDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospital and EPICAD LNC UMR1231, University of Burgundy & Franche Comte, F-21000 Dijon, FranceRegistre des Hémopathies Malignes de Côte d’Or, Dijon-Bourgogne University Hospital, F-21000 Dijon, FranceDepartment of Clinical Hematology, University Hospital INSERM UMR1231 and SAPHIIR-UMR 1231, University of Burgundy & Franche Comte, F-21000 Dijon, FranceDepartment of Clinical Hematology, University Hospital, F-21000 Dijon, FranceDepartment of Clinical Hematology, University Hospital, F-21000 Dijon, FranceDepartment of Clinical Hematology, University Hospital, F-21000 Dijon, FranceDepartment of Clinical Hematology, University Hospital, F-21000 Dijon, FranceDepartment of Clinical Hematology, University Hospital, F-21000 Dijon, FranceDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospital, F-21000 Dijon, FranceDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospital, F-21000 Dijon, FranceDepartment of Clinical Hematology, University Hospital, F-21000 Dijon, FranceDepartment of Clinical Hematology, University Hospital, F-21000 Dijon, FranceDepartment of Clinical Hematology, University Hospital INSERM UMR1231 and SAPHIIR-UMR 1231, University of Burgundy & Franche Comte, F-21000 Dijon, FranceDepartment of Clinical Hematology, University Hospital and SAPHIIR-UMR 1231, University of Burgundy & Franche Comte, F-21000 Dijon, FranceDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospital, F-21000 Dijon, FranceObjectives: The UMACOACH Lymphoma is a multidisciplinary monitoring program for patients initiating a first highly haematotoxic treatment for Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Patient follow-up is based on consultation with a pharmacist and planed phone calls by nurses supervised by a clinical haematologist. Our objective was to assess effectiveness and cost of the UMACOACH Lymphoma Program (ULP) and to investigate patient satisfaction and quality of life (QoL). Methods: This French monocentric case-control study included all patients enrolled in the ULP over a one-year period (cases) matched with retrospective patients receiving usual care (controls). Numbers of adverse events (AEs), re-hospitalisations, average relative dose intensity (ARDI), treatment response and survival were compared between the two groups. Among cases, patient satisfaction and QoL using the EORTC-QLQC30 questionnaire before and after treatment were evaluated. Results: Seventy-eight cases were matched to 78 controls. Twenty-six percent grade 3–4 AEs were observed in cases versus 38% in controls (<i>p</i> = 0.001). There were 76 and 88 re-hospitalisations in the case and control groups, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.217). ARDI > 85% was observed in 92% and 82% of cases and controls, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.138). No differences were observed in terms of treatment responses and survival. Estimated cost savings were of EUR 81,782 in favour of the case group. An improvement of 5.1 points was observed in the total QoL score before and after treatment in cases. Conclusions: A nurse–pharmacist–haematologist collaboration seems to be promising to reduce grade 3–4 AEs in HL and NHL patients receiving highly haematotoxic chemotherapy regimens. Cost savings from hospitalisation being avoided were also shown.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/14/10/2532lymphomafollow-upnursepharmacistimmunochemotherapyhaematotoxicity
spellingShingle Madeline Devaux
Mathieu Boulin
Morgane Mounier
Denis Caillot
Nuri Ahwij
Adélie Herbin
Jean Noël Bastie
Camille Favennec
Philippine Robert
Pauline Pistre
Stephanie Bost
Pauline Amiot
Laurence Jacquesson
Olivier Casasnovas
Cédric Rossi
Pauline Gueneau
Clinical and Economic Impact of a Multidisciplinary Follow-Up Program in Lymphoma Patients
Cancers
lymphoma
follow-up
nurse
pharmacist
immunochemotherapy
haematotoxicity
title Clinical and Economic Impact of a Multidisciplinary Follow-Up Program in Lymphoma Patients
title_full Clinical and Economic Impact of a Multidisciplinary Follow-Up Program in Lymphoma Patients
title_fullStr Clinical and Economic Impact of a Multidisciplinary Follow-Up Program in Lymphoma Patients
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and Economic Impact of a Multidisciplinary Follow-Up Program in Lymphoma Patients
title_short Clinical and Economic Impact of a Multidisciplinary Follow-Up Program in Lymphoma Patients
title_sort clinical and economic impact of a multidisciplinary follow up program in lymphoma patients
topic lymphoma
follow-up
nurse
pharmacist
immunochemotherapy
haematotoxicity
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/14/10/2532
work_keys_str_mv AT madelinedevaux clinicalandeconomicimpactofamultidisciplinaryfollowupprograminlymphomapatients
AT mathieuboulin clinicalandeconomicimpactofamultidisciplinaryfollowupprograminlymphomapatients
AT morganemounier clinicalandeconomicimpactofamultidisciplinaryfollowupprograminlymphomapatients
AT deniscaillot clinicalandeconomicimpactofamultidisciplinaryfollowupprograminlymphomapatients
AT nuriahwij clinicalandeconomicimpactofamultidisciplinaryfollowupprograminlymphomapatients
AT adelieherbin clinicalandeconomicimpactofamultidisciplinaryfollowupprograminlymphomapatients
AT jeannoelbastie clinicalandeconomicimpactofamultidisciplinaryfollowupprograminlymphomapatients
AT camillefavennec clinicalandeconomicimpactofamultidisciplinaryfollowupprograminlymphomapatients
AT philippinerobert clinicalandeconomicimpactofamultidisciplinaryfollowupprograminlymphomapatients
AT paulinepistre clinicalandeconomicimpactofamultidisciplinaryfollowupprograminlymphomapatients
AT stephaniebost clinicalandeconomicimpactofamultidisciplinaryfollowupprograminlymphomapatients
AT paulineamiot clinicalandeconomicimpactofamultidisciplinaryfollowupprograminlymphomapatients
AT laurencejacquesson clinicalandeconomicimpactofamultidisciplinaryfollowupprograminlymphomapatients
AT oliviercasasnovas clinicalandeconomicimpactofamultidisciplinaryfollowupprograminlymphomapatients
AT cedricrossi clinicalandeconomicimpactofamultidisciplinaryfollowupprograminlymphomapatients
AT paulinegueneau clinicalandeconomicimpactofamultidisciplinaryfollowupprograminlymphomapatients