Facilitating Consumers Choice of Healthier Foods: A Comparison of Different Front-of-Package Labelling Schemes Using Slovenian Food Supply Database

Summary indicator front-of-package nutrition labelling schemes are gaining momentum. In Europe, an example of such a scheme is Nutri-Score, which was first introduced in France. Supported by additional research, the scheme has the potential to expand into other countries. Such a scenario opens a ser...

全面介绍

书目详细资料
Main Authors: Urška Pivk Kupirovič, Hristo Hristov, Maša Hribar, Živa Lavriša, Igor Pravst
格式: 文件
语言:English
出版: MDPI AG 2020-03-01
丛编:Foods
主题:
在线阅读:https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/9/4/399
_version_ 1827719544110579712
author Urška Pivk Kupirovič
Hristo Hristov
Maša Hribar
Živa Lavriša
Igor Pravst
author_facet Urška Pivk Kupirovič
Hristo Hristov
Maša Hribar
Živa Lavriša
Igor Pravst
author_sort Urška Pivk Kupirovič
collection DOAJ
description Summary indicator front-of-package nutrition labelling schemes are gaining momentum. In Europe, an example of such a scheme is Nutri-Score, which was first introduced in France. Supported by additional research, the scheme has the potential to expand into other countries. Such a scenario opens a series of questions related to the use of Nutri-Score in the territories with pre-existing food labelling schemes. A key question is whether different nutrition labelling schemes would provide conflicting information for consumers when applied to same foods. The goal of our study was, therefore, to evaluate the alignment of different front-of-package nutrition labelling schemes. The study was conducted using cross-sectional data on the composition of selected categories of prepacked foods with high penetration nutrition/health claims and symbols in the Slovenian food supply. We evaluated a variety of existing front-of-package nutrition labelling schemes: three interpretive nutrition rating systems (Nutri-Score, Health Star Rating (HSR), Traffic light system), four health symbols (Protective Food symbol, Choices, Finnish heart, and Keyhole symbol), and also three nutrient profile models developed for other purposes (Office of Communications (United Kingdom, Ofcom), World Health Organization Regional office for Europe (WHOE) and Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ)). Overall, our results indicate that interpretive nutrition rating systems (i.e., Nutri-Score) are mostly less strict than the nutrient profiles of tested health symbols. A risk of conflicting information would happen in a scenario where food is eligible to carry a health symbol, but is at the same time rated to have lower nutritional quality by an accompanying interpretive nutrition rating system. When Protective Food symbol and Nutri-Score are used together, this would occur for 5% of foods in our sample. To avoid such risks, schemes for health symbols could be adapted to be stricter than interpretive nutrition rating systems used in the same territory/market, but such adaptations are challenging and should be well planned. While our study showed that, in most cases, Nutri-Score is a less strict model than tested health symbols, the rating-system approach might offer useful support and incentive for food producers towards gradual food reformulation.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T20:45:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-215ba842735a4ed18359a6bb30a5328d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2304-8158
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T20:45:40Z
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Foods
spelling doaj.art-215ba842735a4ed18359a6bb30a5328d2023-11-19T20:17:58ZengMDPI AGFoods2304-81582020-03-019439910.3390/foods9040399Facilitating Consumers Choice of Healthier Foods: A Comparison of Different Front-of-Package Labelling Schemes Using Slovenian Food Supply DatabaseUrška Pivk Kupirovič0Hristo Hristov1Maša Hribar2Živa Lavriša3Igor Pravst4Nutrition Institute, Tržaška cesta 40, SI-1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaNutrition Institute, Tržaška cesta 40, SI-1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaNutrition Institute, Tržaška cesta 40, SI-1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaNutrition Institute, Tržaška cesta 40, SI-1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaNutrition Institute, Tržaška cesta 40, SI-1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaSummary indicator front-of-package nutrition labelling schemes are gaining momentum. In Europe, an example of such a scheme is Nutri-Score, which was first introduced in France. Supported by additional research, the scheme has the potential to expand into other countries. Such a scenario opens a series of questions related to the use of Nutri-Score in the territories with pre-existing food labelling schemes. A key question is whether different nutrition labelling schemes would provide conflicting information for consumers when applied to same foods. The goal of our study was, therefore, to evaluate the alignment of different front-of-package nutrition labelling schemes. The study was conducted using cross-sectional data on the composition of selected categories of prepacked foods with high penetration nutrition/health claims and symbols in the Slovenian food supply. We evaluated a variety of existing front-of-package nutrition labelling schemes: three interpretive nutrition rating systems (Nutri-Score, Health Star Rating (HSR), Traffic light system), four health symbols (Protective Food symbol, Choices, Finnish heart, and Keyhole symbol), and also three nutrient profile models developed for other purposes (Office of Communications (United Kingdom, Ofcom), World Health Organization Regional office for Europe (WHOE) and Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ)). Overall, our results indicate that interpretive nutrition rating systems (i.e., Nutri-Score) are mostly less strict than the nutrient profiles of tested health symbols. A risk of conflicting information would happen in a scenario where food is eligible to carry a health symbol, but is at the same time rated to have lower nutritional quality by an accompanying interpretive nutrition rating system. When Protective Food symbol and Nutri-Score are used together, this would occur for 5% of foods in our sample. To avoid such risks, schemes for health symbols could be adapted to be stricter than interpretive nutrition rating systems used in the same territory/market, but such adaptations are challenging and should be well planned. While our study showed that, in most cases, Nutri-Score is a less strict model than tested health symbols, the rating-system approach might offer useful support and incentive for food producers towards gradual food reformulation.https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/9/4/399front-of-package nutrition labelling schemeshealth symbolsnutrient profilingNutri-ScoreHSRchoices
spellingShingle Urška Pivk Kupirovič
Hristo Hristov
Maša Hribar
Živa Lavriša
Igor Pravst
Facilitating Consumers Choice of Healthier Foods: A Comparison of Different Front-of-Package Labelling Schemes Using Slovenian Food Supply Database
Foods
front-of-package nutrition labelling schemes
health symbols
nutrient profiling
Nutri-Score
HSR
choices
title Facilitating Consumers Choice of Healthier Foods: A Comparison of Different Front-of-Package Labelling Schemes Using Slovenian Food Supply Database
title_full Facilitating Consumers Choice of Healthier Foods: A Comparison of Different Front-of-Package Labelling Schemes Using Slovenian Food Supply Database
title_fullStr Facilitating Consumers Choice of Healthier Foods: A Comparison of Different Front-of-Package Labelling Schemes Using Slovenian Food Supply Database
title_full_unstemmed Facilitating Consumers Choice of Healthier Foods: A Comparison of Different Front-of-Package Labelling Schemes Using Slovenian Food Supply Database
title_short Facilitating Consumers Choice of Healthier Foods: A Comparison of Different Front-of-Package Labelling Schemes Using Slovenian Food Supply Database
title_sort facilitating consumers choice of healthier foods a comparison of different front of package labelling schemes using slovenian food supply database
topic front-of-package nutrition labelling schemes
health symbols
nutrient profiling
Nutri-Score
HSR
choices
url https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/9/4/399
work_keys_str_mv AT urskapivkkupirovic facilitatingconsumerschoiceofhealthierfoodsacomparisonofdifferentfrontofpackagelabellingschemesusingslovenianfoodsupplydatabase
AT hristohristov facilitatingconsumerschoiceofhealthierfoodsacomparisonofdifferentfrontofpackagelabellingschemesusingslovenianfoodsupplydatabase
AT masahribar facilitatingconsumerschoiceofhealthierfoodsacomparisonofdifferentfrontofpackagelabellingschemesusingslovenianfoodsupplydatabase
AT zivalavrisa facilitatingconsumerschoiceofhealthierfoodsacomparisonofdifferentfrontofpackagelabellingschemesusingslovenianfoodsupplydatabase
AT igorpravst facilitatingconsumerschoiceofhealthierfoodsacomparisonofdifferentfrontofpackagelabellingschemesusingslovenianfoodsupplydatabase