Seasonal Impact on 3D GPR Performance for Surveying Yedoma Ice Complex Deposits

Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is a popular geophysical method for imaging subsurface structures with a resolution at decimeter scale, which is based on the emission, propagation, and reflection of electromagnetic waves. GPR surveys for imaging the cryosphere benefit from the typically highly resist...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephan Schennen, Sebastian Wetterich, Lutz Schirrmeister, Georg Schwamborn, Jens Tronicke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Earth Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2022.741524/full
_version_ 1811304096084262912
author Stephan Schennen
Sebastian Wetterich
Lutz Schirrmeister
Georg Schwamborn
Jens Tronicke
author_facet Stephan Schennen
Sebastian Wetterich
Lutz Schirrmeister
Georg Schwamborn
Jens Tronicke
author_sort Stephan Schennen
collection DOAJ
description Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is a popular geophysical method for imaging subsurface structures with a resolution at decimeter scale, which is based on the emission, propagation, and reflection of electromagnetic waves. GPR surveys for imaging the cryosphere benefit from the typically highly resistive conditions in frozen ground, resulting in low electromagnetic attenuation and, thus, an increased penetration depth. In permafrost environments, seasonal changes might affect not only GPR performance in terms of vertical resolution, attenuation, and penetration depth, but also regarding the general complexity of data (e.g., due to multiple reflections at thaw boundaries). The experimental setup of our study comparing seasonal differences of summertime thawed and winter- and springtime frozen active layer conditions above ice-rich permafrost allows for estimating advantages and disadvantages of both scenarios. Our results demonstrate major differences in the data and the final GPR image and, thus, will help in future studies to decide about particular survey seasons based on the GPR potential for non-invasive and high-resolution investigations of permafrost properties.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T08:01:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-216158d3b2294ba6be6dfc5edfbccde3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-6463
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T08:01:06Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Earth Science
spelling doaj.art-216158d3b2294ba6be6dfc5edfbccde32022-12-22T02:55:17ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Earth Science2296-64632022-04-011010.3389/feart.2022.741524741524Seasonal Impact on 3D GPR Performance for Surveying Yedoma Ice Complex DepositsStephan Schennen0Sebastian Wetterich1Lutz Schirrmeister2Georg Schwamborn3Jens Tronicke4Institute of Geosciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, GermanyAlfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Center for Polar and Marine Research, Department of Permafrost Research, Potsdam, GermanyAlfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Center for Polar and Marine Research, Department of Permafrost Research, Potsdam, GermanyAlfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Center for Polar and Marine Research, Department of Permafrost Research, Potsdam, GermanyInstitute of Geosciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, GermanyGround-penetrating radar (GPR) is a popular geophysical method for imaging subsurface structures with a resolution at decimeter scale, which is based on the emission, propagation, and reflection of electromagnetic waves. GPR surveys for imaging the cryosphere benefit from the typically highly resistive conditions in frozen ground, resulting in low electromagnetic attenuation and, thus, an increased penetration depth. In permafrost environments, seasonal changes might affect not only GPR performance in terms of vertical resolution, attenuation, and penetration depth, but also regarding the general complexity of data (e.g., due to multiple reflections at thaw boundaries). The experimental setup of our study comparing seasonal differences of summertime thawed and winter- and springtime frozen active layer conditions above ice-rich permafrost allows for estimating advantages and disadvantages of both scenarios. Our results demonstrate major differences in the data and the final GPR image and, thus, will help in future studies to decide about particular survey seasons based on the GPR potential for non-invasive and high-resolution investigations of permafrost properties.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2022.741524/fullGPRseasonal effectsresolutionyedomapermafrost
spellingShingle Stephan Schennen
Sebastian Wetterich
Lutz Schirrmeister
Georg Schwamborn
Jens Tronicke
Seasonal Impact on 3D GPR Performance for Surveying Yedoma Ice Complex Deposits
Frontiers in Earth Science
GPR
seasonal effects
resolution
yedoma
permafrost
title Seasonal Impact on 3D GPR Performance for Surveying Yedoma Ice Complex Deposits
title_full Seasonal Impact on 3D GPR Performance for Surveying Yedoma Ice Complex Deposits
title_fullStr Seasonal Impact on 3D GPR Performance for Surveying Yedoma Ice Complex Deposits
title_full_unstemmed Seasonal Impact on 3D GPR Performance for Surveying Yedoma Ice Complex Deposits
title_short Seasonal Impact on 3D GPR Performance for Surveying Yedoma Ice Complex Deposits
title_sort seasonal impact on 3d gpr performance for surveying yedoma ice complex deposits
topic GPR
seasonal effects
resolution
yedoma
permafrost
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2022.741524/full
work_keys_str_mv AT stephanschennen seasonalimpacton3dgprperformanceforsurveyingyedomaicecomplexdeposits
AT sebastianwetterich seasonalimpacton3dgprperformanceforsurveyingyedomaicecomplexdeposits
AT lutzschirrmeister seasonalimpacton3dgprperformanceforsurveyingyedomaicecomplexdeposits
AT georgschwamborn seasonalimpacton3dgprperformanceforsurveyingyedomaicecomplexdeposits
AT jenstronicke seasonalimpacton3dgprperformanceforsurveyingyedomaicecomplexdeposits