Seasonal Impact on 3D GPR Performance for Surveying Yedoma Ice Complex Deposits
Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is a popular geophysical method for imaging subsurface structures with a resolution at decimeter scale, which is based on the emission, propagation, and reflection of electromagnetic waves. GPR surveys for imaging the cryosphere benefit from the typically highly resist...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022-04-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Earth Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2022.741524/full |
_version_ | 1811304096084262912 |
---|---|
author | Stephan Schennen Sebastian Wetterich Lutz Schirrmeister Georg Schwamborn Jens Tronicke |
author_facet | Stephan Schennen Sebastian Wetterich Lutz Schirrmeister Georg Schwamborn Jens Tronicke |
author_sort | Stephan Schennen |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is a popular geophysical method for imaging subsurface structures with a resolution at decimeter scale, which is based on the emission, propagation, and reflection of electromagnetic waves. GPR surveys for imaging the cryosphere benefit from the typically highly resistive conditions in frozen ground, resulting in low electromagnetic attenuation and, thus, an increased penetration depth. In permafrost environments, seasonal changes might affect not only GPR performance in terms of vertical resolution, attenuation, and penetration depth, but also regarding the general complexity of data (e.g., due to multiple reflections at thaw boundaries). The experimental setup of our study comparing seasonal differences of summertime thawed and winter- and springtime frozen active layer conditions above ice-rich permafrost allows for estimating advantages and disadvantages of both scenarios. Our results demonstrate major differences in the data and the final GPR image and, thus, will help in future studies to decide about particular survey seasons based on the GPR potential for non-invasive and high-resolution investigations of permafrost properties. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-13T08:01:06Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-216158d3b2294ba6be6dfc5edfbccde3 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2296-6463 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-13T08:01:06Z |
publishDate | 2022-04-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Earth Science |
spelling | doaj.art-216158d3b2294ba6be6dfc5edfbccde32022-12-22T02:55:17ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Earth Science2296-64632022-04-011010.3389/feart.2022.741524741524Seasonal Impact on 3D GPR Performance for Surveying Yedoma Ice Complex DepositsStephan Schennen0Sebastian Wetterich1Lutz Schirrmeister2Georg Schwamborn3Jens Tronicke4Institute of Geosciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, GermanyAlfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Center for Polar and Marine Research, Department of Permafrost Research, Potsdam, GermanyAlfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Center for Polar and Marine Research, Department of Permafrost Research, Potsdam, GermanyAlfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Center for Polar and Marine Research, Department of Permafrost Research, Potsdam, GermanyInstitute of Geosciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, GermanyGround-penetrating radar (GPR) is a popular geophysical method for imaging subsurface structures with a resolution at decimeter scale, which is based on the emission, propagation, and reflection of electromagnetic waves. GPR surveys for imaging the cryosphere benefit from the typically highly resistive conditions in frozen ground, resulting in low electromagnetic attenuation and, thus, an increased penetration depth. In permafrost environments, seasonal changes might affect not only GPR performance in terms of vertical resolution, attenuation, and penetration depth, but also regarding the general complexity of data (e.g., due to multiple reflections at thaw boundaries). The experimental setup of our study comparing seasonal differences of summertime thawed and winter- and springtime frozen active layer conditions above ice-rich permafrost allows for estimating advantages and disadvantages of both scenarios. Our results demonstrate major differences in the data and the final GPR image and, thus, will help in future studies to decide about particular survey seasons based on the GPR potential for non-invasive and high-resolution investigations of permafrost properties.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2022.741524/fullGPRseasonal effectsresolutionyedomapermafrost |
spellingShingle | Stephan Schennen Sebastian Wetterich Lutz Schirrmeister Georg Schwamborn Jens Tronicke Seasonal Impact on 3D GPR Performance for Surveying Yedoma Ice Complex Deposits Frontiers in Earth Science GPR seasonal effects resolution yedoma permafrost |
title | Seasonal Impact on 3D GPR Performance for Surveying Yedoma Ice Complex Deposits |
title_full | Seasonal Impact on 3D GPR Performance for Surveying Yedoma Ice Complex Deposits |
title_fullStr | Seasonal Impact on 3D GPR Performance for Surveying Yedoma Ice Complex Deposits |
title_full_unstemmed | Seasonal Impact on 3D GPR Performance for Surveying Yedoma Ice Complex Deposits |
title_short | Seasonal Impact on 3D GPR Performance for Surveying Yedoma Ice Complex Deposits |
title_sort | seasonal impact on 3d gpr performance for surveying yedoma ice complex deposits |
topic | GPR seasonal effects resolution yedoma permafrost |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2022.741524/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stephanschennen seasonalimpacton3dgprperformanceforsurveyingyedomaicecomplexdeposits AT sebastianwetterich seasonalimpacton3dgprperformanceforsurveyingyedomaicecomplexdeposits AT lutzschirrmeister seasonalimpacton3dgprperformanceforsurveyingyedomaicecomplexdeposits AT georgschwamborn seasonalimpacton3dgprperformanceforsurveyingyedomaicecomplexdeposits AT jenstronicke seasonalimpacton3dgprperformanceforsurveyingyedomaicecomplexdeposits |