Cognitive and memory training in adults at risk of dementia: A Systematic Review

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Effective non-pharmacological cognitive interventions to prevent Alzheimer's dementia or slow its progression are an urgent international priority. The aim of this review was to evaluate cognitive training trials in individuals...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sachdev Perminder S, Gates Nicola J, Fiatarone Singh Maria A, Valenzuela Michael
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-09-01
Series:BMC Geriatrics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/11/55
_version_ 1811271270842499072
author Sachdev Perminder S
Gates Nicola J
Fiatarone Singh Maria A
Valenzuela Michael
author_facet Sachdev Perminder S
Gates Nicola J
Fiatarone Singh Maria A
Valenzuela Michael
author_sort Sachdev Perminder S
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Effective non-pharmacological cognitive interventions to prevent Alzheimer's dementia or slow its progression are an urgent international priority. The aim of this review was to evaluate cognitive training trials in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and evaluate the efficacy of training in memory strategies or cognitive exercises to determine if cognitive training could benefit individuals at risk of developing dementia.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A systematic review of eligible trials was undertaken, followed by effect size analysis. Cognitive training was differentiated from other cognitive interventions not meeting generally accepted definitions, and included both cognitive exercises and memory strategies.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Ten studies enrolling a total of 305 subjects met criteria for cognitive training in MCI. Only five of the studies were randomized controlled trials. Meta-analysis was not considered appropriate due to the heterogeneity of interventions. Moderate effects on memory outcomes were identified in seven trials. Cognitive exercises (relative effect sizes ranged from .10 to 1.21) may lead to greater benefits than memory strategies (.88 to -1.18) on memory.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Previous conclusions of a lack of efficacy for cognitive training in MCI may have been influenced by not clearly defining the intervention. Our systematic review found that cognitive exercises can produce moderate-to-large beneficial effects on memory-related outcomes. However, the number of high quality RCTs remains low, and so further trials must be a priority. Several suggestions for the better design of cognitive training trials are provided.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-12T22:18:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2165acc39e7e45a89b2429ba9c972cec
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2318
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T22:18:11Z
publishDate 2011-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Geriatrics
spelling doaj.art-2165acc39e7e45a89b2429ba9c972cec2022-12-22T03:14:27ZengBMCBMC Geriatrics1471-23182011-09-011115510.1186/1471-2318-11-55Cognitive and memory training in adults at risk of dementia: A Systematic ReviewSachdev Perminder SGates Nicola JFiatarone Singh Maria AValenzuela Michael<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Effective non-pharmacological cognitive interventions to prevent Alzheimer's dementia or slow its progression are an urgent international priority. The aim of this review was to evaluate cognitive training trials in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and evaluate the efficacy of training in memory strategies or cognitive exercises to determine if cognitive training could benefit individuals at risk of developing dementia.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A systematic review of eligible trials was undertaken, followed by effect size analysis. Cognitive training was differentiated from other cognitive interventions not meeting generally accepted definitions, and included both cognitive exercises and memory strategies.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Ten studies enrolling a total of 305 subjects met criteria for cognitive training in MCI. Only five of the studies were randomized controlled trials. Meta-analysis was not considered appropriate due to the heterogeneity of interventions. Moderate effects on memory outcomes were identified in seven trials. Cognitive exercises (relative effect sizes ranged from .10 to 1.21) may lead to greater benefits than memory strategies (.88 to -1.18) on memory.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Previous conclusions of a lack of efficacy for cognitive training in MCI may have been influenced by not clearly defining the intervention. Our systematic review found that cognitive exercises can produce moderate-to-large beneficial effects on memory-related outcomes. However, the number of high quality RCTs remains low, and so further trials must be a priority. Several suggestions for the better design of cognitive training trials are provided.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/11/55
spellingShingle Sachdev Perminder S
Gates Nicola J
Fiatarone Singh Maria A
Valenzuela Michael
Cognitive and memory training in adults at risk of dementia: A Systematic Review
BMC Geriatrics
title Cognitive and memory training in adults at risk of dementia: A Systematic Review
title_full Cognitive and memory training in adults at risk of dementia: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Cognitive and memory training in adults at risk of dementia: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive and memory training in adults at risk of dementia: A Systematic Review
title_short Cognitive and memory training in adults at risk of dementia: A Systematic Review
title_sort cognitive and memory training in adults at risk of dementia a systematic review
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/11/55
work_keys_str_mv AT sachdevperminders cognitiveandmemorytraininginadultsatriskofdementiaasystematicreview
AT gatesnicolaj cognitiveandmemorytraininginadultsatriskofdementiaasystematicreview
AT fiataronesinghmariaa cognitiveandmemorytraininginadultsatriskofdementiaasystematicreview
AT valenzuelamichael cognitiveandmemorytraininginadultsatriskofdementiaasystematicreview