To Overrule or Not? Precedent and the United States Supreme Court
The principle of stare decisis in United States courts appears in two aspects – the courts of lower jurisdiction are bound by the rulings issued by the courts of higher jurisdictions and as a horizontal binding of the Supreme Court by its own rulings. The latter ‘binding’ is not as strong as the for...
Main Author: | Eric J. Segall |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Maria Curie-Skłodowska University
2018-05-01
|
Series: | Studia Iuridica Lublinensia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.umcs.pl/sil/article/view/6597 |
Similar Items
-
OBSOLESCENCE AND MANDATORY JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE DOCTRINE OF STARE DECISIS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
by: Frederico Augusto Lepoldino Koehler, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01) -
Overruling Roe v. Wade?
by: Davide Paris -
Precedent and United States Administrative Law
by: William A. Edmundson
Published: (2018-05-01) -
The power of precedent /
by: 399773 Gerhardt, Michael J.
Published: (2008) -
DEFINING PRECEDENTS
by: Gabriel Sardenberg Cunha
Published: (2019-12-01)