Implementation of clinical practice guidelines on lifestyle interventions in Swedish primary healthcare – a two-year follow up

Abstract Background Implementation of interventions concerning prevention and health promotion in health care has faced particular challenges resulting in a low frequency and quality of these services. In November 2011, the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare released national clinical prac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Therese Kardakis, Lars Jerdén, Monica E. Nyström, Lars Weinehall, Helene Johansson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-04-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-018-3023-z
_version_ 1818926849223294976
author Therese Kardakis
Lars Jerdén
Monica E. Nyström
Lars Weinehall
Helene Johansson
author_facet Therese Kardakis
Lars Jerdén
Monica E. Nyström
Lars Weinehall
Helene Johansson
author_sort Therese Kardakis
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Implementation of interventions concerning prevention and health promotion in health care has faced particular challenges resulting in a low frequency and quality of these services. In November 2011, the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare released national clinical practice guidelines to counteract patients’ unhealthy lifestyle habits. Drawing on the results of a previous study as a point of departure, the aim of this two-year follow up was to assess the progress of work with lifestyle interventions in primary healthcare as well as the uptake and usage of the new guidelines on lifestyle interventions in clinical practice. Methods Longitudinal study among health professionals with survey at baseline and 2 years later. Development over time and differences between professional groups were calculated with Pearson chi-square test. Results Eighteen percent of the physicians reported to use the clinical practice guidelines, compared to 58% of the nurses. Nurses were also more likely to consider them as a support in their work than physicians did. Over time, health professionals usage of methods to change patients’ tobacco habits and hazardous use of alcohol had increased, and the nurses worked to a higher extent than before with all four lifestyles. Knowledge on methods for lifestyle change was generally high; however, there was room for improvement concerning methods on alcohol, unhealthy eating and counselling. Forty-one percent reported to possess thorough knowledge of counselling skills. Conclusions Even if the uptake and usage of the CPGs on lifestyle interventions so far is low, the participants reported more frequent counselling on patients’ lifestyle changes concerning use of tobacco and hazardous use of alcohol. However, these findings should be evaluated acknowledging the possibility of selection bias in favour of health promotion and lifestyle guidance, and the loss of one study site in the follow up. Furthermore, this study indicates important differences in physicians and nurses’ attitudes to and use of the guidelines, where the nurses reported working to a higher extent with all four lifestyles compared to the first study. These findings suggest further investigations on the implementation process in clinical practice, and the physicians’ uptake and use of the CPGs.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T03:03:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-21aabfd7437549e8a56c29a8d757792f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T03:03:39Z
publishDate 2018-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-21aabfd7437549e8a56c29a8d757792f2022-12-21T19:55:39ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632018-04-0118111310.1186/s12913-018-3023-zImplementation of clinical practice guidelines on lifestyle interventions in Swedish primary healthcare – a two-year follow upTherese Kardakis0Lars Jerdén1Monica E. Nyström2Lars Weinehall3Helene Johansson4Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå UniversityDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå UniversityDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå UniversityDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå UniversityDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå UniversityAbstract Background Implementation of interventions concerning prevention and health promotion in health care has faced particular challenges resulting in a low frequency and quality of these services. In November 2011, the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare released national clinical practice guidelines to counteract patients’ unhealthy lifestyle habits. Drawing on the results of a previous study as a point of departure, the aim of this two-year follow up was to assess the progress of work with lifestyle interventions in primary healthcare as well as the uptake and usage of the new guidelines on lifestyle interventions in clinical practice. Methods Longitudinal study among health professionals with survey at baseline and 2 years later. Development over time and differences between professional groups were calculated with Pearson chi-square test. Results Eighteen percent of the physicians reported to use the clinical practice guidelines, compared to 58% of the nurses. Nurses were also more likely to consider them as a support in their work than physicians did. Over time, health professionals usage of methods to change patients’ tobacco habits and hazardous use of alcohol had increased, and the nurses worked to a higher extent than before with all four lifestyles. Knowledge on methods for lifestyle change was generally high; however, there was room for improvement concerning methods on alcohol, unhealthy eating and counselling. Forty-one percent reported to possess thorough knowledge of counselling skills. Conclusions Even if the uptake and usage of the CPGs on lifestyle interventions so far is low, the participants reported more frequent counselling on patients’ lifestyle changes concerning use of tobacco and hazardous use of alcohol. However, these findings should be evaluated acknowledging the possibility of selection bias in favour of health promotion and lifestyle guidance, and the loss of one study site in the follow up. Furthermore, this study indicates important differences in physicians and nurses’ attitudes to and use of the guidelines, where the nurses reported working to a higher extent with all four lifestyles compared to the first study. These findings suggest further investigations on the implementation process in clinical practice, and the physicians’ uptake and use of the CPGs.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-018-3023-zImplementationLifestyleClinical practice guidelinesPrimary health carePreventive health servicesHealth promotion
spellingShingle Therese Kardakis
Lars Jerdén
Monica E. Nyström
Lars Weinehall
Helene Johansson
Implementation of clinical practice guidelines on lifestyle interventions in Swedish primary healthcare – a two-year follow up
BMC Health Services Research
Implementation
Lifestyle
Clinical practice guidelines
Primary health care
Preventive health services
Health promotion
title Implementation of clinical practice guidelines on lifestyle interventions in Swedish primary healthcare – a two-year follow up
title_full Implementation of clinical practice guidelines on lifestyle interventions in Swedish primary healthcare – a two-year follow up
title_fullStr Implementation of clinical practice guidelines on lifestyle interventions in Swedish primary healthcare – a two-year follow up
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of clinical practice guidelines on lifestyle interventions in Swedish primary healthcare – a two-year follow up
title_short Implementation of clinical practice guidelines on lifestyle interventions in Swedish primary healthcare – a two-year follow up
title_sort implementation of clinical practice guidelines on lifestyle interventions in swedish primary healthcare a two year follow up
topic Implementation
Lifestyle
Clinical practice guidelines
Primary health care
Preventive health services
Health promotion
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-018-3023-z
work_keys_str_mv AT theresekardakis implementationofclinicalpracticeguidelinesonlifestyleinterventionsinswedishprimaryhealthcareatwoyearfollowup
AT larsjerden implementationofclinicalpracticeguidelinesonlifestyleinterventionsinswedishprimaryhealthcareatwoyearfollowup
AT monicaenystrom implementationofclinicalpracticeguidelinesonlifestyleinterventionsinswedishprimaryhealthcareatwoyearfollowup
AT larsweinehall implementationofclinicalpracticeguidelinesonlifestyleinterventionsinswedishprimaryhealthcareatwoyearfollowup
AT helenejohansson implementationofclinicalpracticeguidelinesonlifestyleinterventionsinswedishprimaryhealthcareatwoyearfollowup