Intermediate-term outcome of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant

Purpose: To report the intermediate-term safety and efficacy of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI) in patients with glaucoma. Methods: Retrospective review of patients who underwent AADI between January 2013 and December 2016. Patients aged >16 years and with a minimum follow-up of 6 months...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reji Philip, Premanand Chandran, Nabeed Aboobacker, Mrunali Dhavalikar, Ganesh V Raman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2019;volume=67;issue=2;spage=233;epage=238;aulast=Philip
_version_ 1819025897509879808
author Reji Philip
Premanand Chandran
Nabeed Aboobacker
Mrunali Dhavalikar
Ganesh V Raman
author_facet Reji Philip
Premanand Chandran
Nabeed Aboobacker
Mrunali Dhavalikar
Ganesh V Raman
author_sort Reji Philip
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: To report the intermediate-term safety and efficacy of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI) in patients with glaucoma. Methods: Retrospective review of patients who underwent AADI between January 2013 and December 2016. Patients aged >16 years and with a minimum follow-up of 6 months were included. Success was defined as complete when the intraocular pressure was ≥6 and ≤21 mmHg without antiglaucoma medication and as qualified if those requiring additional antiglaucoma medications were included. Results: The study included 55 patients (55 eyes) with a mean age ± standard deviation (SD) of 47.3 ± 18.1 years with a mean follow-up of 16.7 ± 11.4 months. Mean intraocular pressure reduced from 30.8 ± 11.1 mmHg to 13.1 ± 4.7, 14.1 ± 4.8, 15.7 ± 2.5 (P < 0.001) mmHg at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively. The mean number of antiglaucoma medications reduced from 3.4 ± 1 to 0.8 ± 1.2, 0.7 ± 1.1, 0.8 ± 1 (P < 0.001) at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively. The cumulative probability of complete and qualified success was 62% and 100% at 6 months, 54% and 92% at 1 year, and 43% and 88% at 2 years, respectively. Four patients failed during the follow-up period. Postoperative complication occurred in 28 eyes (51%), of which 17 eyes (31%) required intervention. Conclusion: AADI is a safe and effective treatment for the control of intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T05:17:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-21c4d9afc1b34296b9fc24b109c4c3ca
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0301-4738
1998-3689
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T05:17:59Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-21c4d9afc1b34296b9fc24b109c4c3ca2022-12-21T19:14:53ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Ophthalmology0301-47381998-36892019-01-0167223323810.4103/ijo.IJO_675_18Intermediate-term outcome of Aurolab aqueous drainage implantReji PhilipPremanand ChandranNabeed AboobackerMrunali DhavalikarGanesh V RamanPurpose: To report the intermediate-term safety and efficacy of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI) in patients with glaucoma. Methods: Retrospective review of patients who underwent AADI between January 2013 and December 2016. Patients aged >16 years and with a minimum follow-up of 6 months were included. Success was defined as complete when the intraocular pressure was ≥6 and ≤21 mmHg without antiglaucoma medication and as qualified if those requiring additional antiglaucoma medications were included. Results: The study included 55 patients (55 eyes) with a mean age ± standard deviation (SD) of 47.3 ± 18.1 years with a mean follow-up of 16.7 ± 11.4 months. Mean intraocular pressure reduced from 30.8 ± 11.1 mmHg to 13.1 ± 4.7, 14.1 ± 4.8, 15.7 ± 2.5 (P < 0.001) mmHg at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively. The mean number of antiglaucoma medications reduced from 3.4 ± 1 to 0.8 ± 1.2, 0.7 ± 1.1, 0.8 ± 1 (P < 0.001) at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively. The cumulative probability of complete and qualified success was 62% and 100% at 6 months, 54% and 92% at 1 year, and 43% and 88% at 2 years, respectively. Four patients failed during the follow-up period. Postoperative complication occurred in 28 eyes (51%), of which 17 eyes (31%) required intervention. Conclusion: AADI is a safe and effective treatment for the control of intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma.http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2019;volume=67;issue=2;spage=233;epage=238;aulast=PhilipAdult glaucomaAurolab aqueous drainage implantglaucoma drainage device
spellingShingle Reji Philip
Premanand Chandran
Nabeed Aboobacker
Mrunali Dhavalikar
Ganesh V Raman
Intermediate-term outcome of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Adult glaucoma
Aurolab aqueous drainage implant
glaucoma drainage device
title Intermediate-term outcome of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant
title_full Intermediate-term outcome of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant
title_fullStr Intermediate-term outcome of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant
title_full_unstemmed Intermediate-term outcome of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant
title_short Intermediate-term outcome of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant
title_sort intermediate term outcome of aurolab aqueous drainage implant
topic Adult glaucoma
Aurolab aqueous drainage implant
glaucoma drainage device
url http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2019;volume=67;issue=2;spage=233;epage=238;aulast=Philip
work_keys_str_mv AT rejiphilip intermediatetermoutcomeofaurolabaqueousdrainageimplant
AT premanandchandran intermediatetermoutcomeofaurolabaqueousdrainageimplant
AT nabeedaboobacker intermediatetermoutcomeofaurolabaqueousdrainageimplant
AT mrunalidhavalikar intermediatetermoutcomeofaurolabaqueousdrainageimplant
AT ganeshvraman intermediatetermoutcomeofaurolabaqueousdrainageimplant