Drip loss assessment by EZ and bag methods and their relationship with pH value and color in mutton

<p>Drip loss, pH value, and color are among the important traits that determine meat quality. Contrary to pH and color, the method associated with drip loss is not yet standardized, and literature data are difficult to compare. Besides, to our knowledge, there is no research comparing drip los...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. Kaić, A. Kasap, I. Širić, B. Mioč
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2020-08-01
Series:Archives Animal Breeding
Online Access:https://aab.copernicus.org/articles/63/277/2020/aab-63-277-2020.pdf
_version_ 1818317850663714816
author A. Kaić
A. Kasap
I. Širić
B. Mioč
author_facet A. Kaić
A. Kasap
I. Širić
B. Mioč
author_sort A. Kaić
collection DOAJ
description <p>Drip loss, pH value, and color are among the important traits that determine meat quality. Contrary to pH and color, the method associated with drip loss is not yet standardized, and literature data are difficult to compare. Besides, to our knowledge, there is no research comparing drip loss methods and their relation with pH and color in mutton. This study aimed to assess drip loss measurements in mutton taken by different methods (EZ and bag – BM) and their relationship with pH values and color. Mutton samples (<i>Musculus longissimus thoracis et lumborum</i>) originating from 20 ewes of Istrian sheep were used to examine the effect of the method on drip loss after 24&thinsp;h (EZ<span class="inline-formula"><sub>24</sub></span> vs. BM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>24</sub></span>) and 48&thinsp;h (EZ<span class="inline-formula"><sub>48</sub></span> vs. BM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>48</sub></span>). Furthermore, correlations between drip loss, pH value, and color were analyzed. The statistical analysis was conducted in R programming environment by using different packages. Within the EZ method there was no significant difference (<span class="inline-formula"><i>p</i><i>&gt;</i>0.05</span>) between ventral and dorsal sample cores used for the assessment of EZ drip loss. Drip loss measured with the same method at two different points of time (24 and 48&thinsp;h) differed significantly (<span class="inline-formula"><i>p</i><i>&lt;</i>0.001</span>). There was also a significant difference in drip loss determined by different methods (EZ vs. BM) at the same point of time. There were significant (<span class="inline-formula"><i>p</i><i>&lt;</i>0.05</span>) correlations between pH<span class="inline-formula"><sub>45 min</sub></span> and all color parameters (<span class="inline-formula"><i>L</i><sup>*</sup>4</span>, <span class="inline-formula"><i>a</i><sup>*</sup></span>, <span class="inline-formula"><i>b</i><sup>*</sup></span>). The <span class="inline-formula"><i>L</i><sup>*</sup></span>, <span class="inline-formula"><i>a</i><sup>*</sup></span>, and <span class="inline-formula"><i>b</i><sup>*</sup></span> parameters were highly correlated (<span class="inline-formula"><i>p</i><i>&lt;</i>0.001</span>). The strongest correlation occurred between <span class="inline-formula"><i>a</i><sup>*</sup></span> and <span class="inline-formula"><i>b</i><sup>*</sup></span> parameter (<span class="inline-formula"><i>r</i>=0.93</span>). Correlations between drip loss by EZ method and other meat quality attributes were low and not significant. The <span class="inline-formula"><i>b</i><sup>*</sup></span> parameter correlated with BM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>24</sub></span> (<span class="inline-formula"><i>r</i>=0.46</span>) and BM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>48</sub></span> (<span class="inline-formula"><i>r</i>=0.58</span>), while <span class="inline-formula"><i>a</i><sup>*</sup></span> correlated only with BM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>48</sub></span> (<span class="inline-formula"><i>r</i>=0.50</span>). The correlations between the EZ<span class="inline-formula"><sub>24</sub></span> and BM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>24</sub></span> as well as between the EZ<span class="inline-formula"><sub>48</sub></span> and BM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>48</sub></span> were both non-significant (<span class="inline-formula"><i>p</i><i>&gt;</i>0.05</span>). Drip loss cannot be predicted with sufficient accuracy by using pH and color. EZ and BM method in mutton do not provide equivalent results for measuring drip loss. Comparisons of the results obtained with different methods should be avoided or at least performed with great precaution.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-13T09:43:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-21d65c368c9b4d2bb1821b9e53c1db1c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0003-9438
2363-9822
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T09:43:53Z
publishDate 2020-08-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Archives Animal Breeding
spelling doaj.art-21d65c368c9b4d2bb1821b9e53c1db1c2022-12-21T23:52:08ZengCopernicus PublicationsArchives Animal Breeding0003-94382363-98222020-08-016327728110.5194/aab-63-277-2020Drip loss assessment by EZ and bag methods and their relationship with pH value and color in muttonA. KaićA. KasapI. ŠirićB. Mioč<p>Drip loss, pH value, and color are among the important traits that determine meat quality. Contrary to pH and color, the method associated with drip loss is not yet standardized, and literature data are difficult to compare. Besides, to our knowledge, there is no research comparing drip loss methods and their relation with pH and color in mutton. This study aimed to assess drip loss measurements in mutton taken by different methods (EZ and bag – BM) and their relationship with pH values and color. Mutton samples (<i>Musculus longissimus thoracis et lumborum</i>) originating from 20 ewes of Istrian sheep were used to examine the effect of the method on drip loss after 24&thinsp;h (EZ<span class="inline-formula"><sub>24</sub></span> vs. BM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>24</sub></span>) and 48&thinsp;h (EZ<span class="inline-formula"><sub>48</sub></span> vs. BM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>48</sub></span>). Furthermore, correlations between drip loss, pH value, and color were analyzed. The statistical analysis was conducted in R programming environment by using different packages. Within the EZ method there was no significant difference (<span class="inline-formula"><i>p</i><i>&gt;</i>0.05</span>) between ventral and dorsal sample cores used for the assessment of EZ drip loss. Drip loss measured with the same method at two different points of time (24 and 48&thinsp;h) differed significantly (<span class="inline-formula"><i>p</i><i>&lt;</i>0.001</span>). There was also a significant difference in drip loss determined by different methods (EZ vs. BM) at the same point of time. There were significant (<span class="inline-formula"><i>p</i><i>&lt;</i>0.05</span>) correlations between pH<span class="inline-formula"><sub>45 min</sub></span> and all color parameters (<span class="inline-formula"><i>L</i><sup>*</sup>4</span>, <span class="inline-formula"><i>a</i><sup>*</sup></span>, <span class="inline-formula"><i>b</i><sup>*</sup></span>). The <span class="inline-formula"><i>L</i><sup>*</sup></span>, <span class="inline-formula"><i>a</i><sup>*</sup></span>, and <span class="inline-formula"><i>b</i><sup>*</sup></span> parameters were highly correlated (<span class="inline-formula"><i>p</i><i>&lt;</i>0.001</span>). The strongest correlation occurred between <span class="inline-formula"><i>a</i><sup>*</sup></span> and <span class="inline-formula"><i>b</i><sup>*</sup></span> parameter (<span class="inline-formula"><i>r</i>=0.93</span>). Correlations between drip loss by EZ method and other meat quality attributes were low and not significant. The <span class="inline-formula"><i>b</i><sup>*</sup></span> parameter correlated with BM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>24</sub></span> (<span class="inline-formula"><i>r</i>=0.46</span>) and BM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>48</sub></span> (<span class="inline-formula"><i>r</i>=0.58</span>), while <span class="inline-formula"><i>a</i><sup>*</sup></span> correlated only with BM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>48</sub></span> (<span class="inline-formula"><i>r</i>=0.50</span>). The correlations between the EZ<span class="inline-formula"><sub>24</sub></span> and BM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>24</sub></span> as well as between the EZ<span class="inline-formula"><sub>48</sub></span> and BM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>48</sub></span> were both non-significant (<span class="inline-formula"><i>p</i><i>&gt;</i>0.05</span>). Drip loss cannot be predicted with sufficient accuracy by using pH and color. EZ and BM method in mutton do not provide equivalent results for measuring drip loss. Comparisons of the results obtained with different methods should be avoided or at least performed with great precaution.</p>https://aab.copernicus.org/articles/63/277/2020/aab-63-277-2020.pdf
spellingShingle A. Kaić
A. Kasap
I. Širić
B. Mioč
Drip loss assessment by EZ and bag methods and their relationship with pH value and color in mutton
Archives Animal Breeding
title Drip loss assessment by EZ and bag methods and their relationship with pH value and color in mutton
title_full Drip loss assessment by EZ and bag methods and their relationship with pH value and color in mutton
title_fullStr Drip loss assessment by EZ and bag methods and their relationship with pH value and color in mutton
title_full_unstemmed Drip loss assessment by EZ and bag methods and their relationship with pH value and color in mutton
title_short Drip loss assessment by EZ and bag methods and their relationship with pH value and color in mutton
title_sort drip loss assessment by ez and bag methods and their relationship with ph value and color in mutton
url https://aab.copernicus.org/articles/63/277/2020/aab-63-277-2020.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT akaic driplossassessmentbyezandbagmethodsandtheirrelationshipwithphvalueandcolorinmutton
AT akasap driplossassessmentbyezandbagmethodsandtheirrelationshipwithphvalueandcolorinmutton
AT isiric driplossassessmentbyezandbagmethodsandtheirrelationshipwithphvalueandcolorinmutton
AT bmioc driplossassessmentbyezandbagmethodsandtheirrelationshipwithphvalueandcolorinmutton