Performance of the CellaVision ® DM96 system for detecting red blood cell morphologic abnormalities

Background: Red blood cell (RBC) analysis is a key feature in the evaluation of hematological disorders. The gold standard light microscopy technique has high sensitivity, but is a relativity time-consuming and labor intensive procedure. This study tested the sensitivity and specificity of gold stan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher L Horn, Adnan Mansoor, Brenda Wood, Heather Nelson, Diane Higa, Lik Hang Lee, Christopher Naugler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2015-01-01
Series:Journal of Pathology Informatics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jpathinformatics.org/article.asp?issn=2153-3539;year=2015;volume=6;issue=1;spage=11;epage=11;aulast=Horn
_version_ 1818230302050353152
author Christopher L Horn
Adnan Mansoor
Brenda Wood
Heather Nelson
Diane Higa
Lik Hang Lee
Christopher Naugler
author_facet Christopher L Horn
Adnan Mansoor
Brenda Wood
Heather Nelson
Diane Higa
Lik Hang Lee
Christopher Naugler
author_sort Christopher L Horn
collection DOAJ
description Background: Red blood cell (RBC) analysis is a key feature in the evaluation of hematological disorders. The gold standard light microscopy technique has high sensitivity, but is a relativity time-consuming and labor intensive procedure. This study tested the sensitivity and specificity of gold standard light microscopy manual differential to the CellaVision ® DM96 (CCS; CellaVision, Lund, Sweden) automated image analysis system, which takes digital images of samples at high magnification and compares these images with an artificial neural network based on a database of cells and preclassified according to RBC morphology. Methods: In this study, 212 abnormal peripheral blood smears within the Calgary Laboratory Services network of hospital laboratories were selected and assessed for 15 different RBC morphologic abnormalities by manual microscopy. The same samples were reassessed as a manual addition from the instrument screen using the CellaVision ® DM96 system with 8 microscope high power fields (×100 objective and a 22 mm ocular). The results of the investigation were then used to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of the CellaVision ® DM96 system in reference to light microscopy. Results: The sensitivity ranged from a low of 33% (RBC agglutination) to a high of 100% (sickle cells, stomatocytes). The remainder of the RBC abnormalities tested somewhere between these two extremes. The specificity ranged from 84% (schistocytes) to 99.5% (sickle cells, stomatocytes). Conclusions: Our results showed generally high specificities but variable sensitivities for RBC morphologic abnormalities.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T10:32:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-21e75923b380488fa338daf6d2c7cbfe
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2153-3539
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T10:32:20Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Pathology Informatics
spelling doaj.art-21e75923b380488fa338daf6d2c7cbfe2022-12-22T00:27:19ZengElsevierJournal of Pathology Informatics2153-35392015-01-0161111110.4103/2153-3539.151922Performance of the CellaVision ® DM96 system for detecting red blood cell morphologic abnormalitiesChristopher L HornAdnan MansoorBrenda WoodHeather NelsonDiane HigaLik Hang LeeChristopher NauglerBackground: Red blood cell (RBC) analysis is a key feature in the evaluation of hematological disorders. The gold standard light microscopy technique has high sensitivity, but is a relativity time-consuming and labor intensive procedure. This study tested the sensitivity and specificity of gold standard light microscopy manual differential to the CellaVision ® DM96 (CCS; CellaVision, Lund, Sweden) automated image analysis system, which takes digital images of samples at high magnification and compares these images with an artificial neural network based on a database of cells and preclassified according to RBC morphology. Methods: In this study, 212 abnormal peripheral blood smears within the Calgary Laboratory Services network of hospital laboratories were selected and assessed for 15 different RBC morphologic abnormalities by manual microscopy. The same samples were reassessed as a manual addition from the instrument screen using the CellaVision ® DM96 system with 8 microscope high power fields (×100 objective and a 22 mm ocular). The results of the investigation were then used to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of the CellaVision ® DM96 system in reference to light microscopy. Results: The sensitivity ranged from a low of 33% (RBC agglutination) to a high of 100% (sickle cells, stomatocytes). The remainder of the RBC abnormalities tested somewhere between these two extremes. The specificity ranged from 84% (schistocytes) to 99.5% (sickle cells, stomatocytes). Conclusions: Our results showed generally high specificities but variable sensitivities for RBC morphologic abnormalities.http://www.jpathinformatics.org/article.asp?issn=2153-3539;year=2015;volume=6;issue=1;spage=11;epage=11;aulast=HornImage analysis, method validation, peripheral blood smears
spellingShingle Christopher L Horn
Adnan Mansoor
Brenda Wood
Heather Nelson
Diane Higa
Lik Hang Lee
Christopher Naugler
Performance of the CellaVision ® DM96 system for detecting red blood cell morphologic abnormalities
Journal of Pathology Informatics
Image analysis, method validation, peripheral blood smears
title Performance of the CellaVision ® DM96 system for detecting red blood cell morphologic abnormalities
title_full Performance of the CellaVision ® DM96 system for detecting red blood cell morphologic abnormalities
title_fullStr Performance of the CellaVision ® DM96 system for detecting red blood cell morphologic abnormalities
title_full_unstemmed Performance of the CellaVision ® DM96 system for detecting red blood cell morphologic abnormalities
title_short Performance of the CellaVision ® DM96 system for detecting red blood cell morphologic abnormalities
title_sort performance of the cellavision r dm96 system for detecting red blood cell morphologic abnormalities
topic Image analysis, method validation, peripheral blood smears
url http://www.jpathinformatics.org/article.asp?issn=2153-3539;year=2015;volume=6;issue=1;spage=11;epage=11;aulast=Horn
work_keys_str_mv AT christopherlhorn performanceofthecellavisiondm96systemfordetectingredbloodcellmorphologicabnormalities
AT adnanmansoor performanceofthecellavisiondm96systemfordetectingredbloodcellmorphologicabnormalities
AT brendawood performanceofthecellavisiondm96systemfordetectingredbloodcellmorphologicabnormalities
AT heathernelson performanceofthecellavisiondm96systemfordetectingredbloodcellmorphologicabnormalities
AT dianehiga performanceofthecellavisiondm96systemfordetectingredbloodcellmorphologicabnormalities
AT likhanglee performanceofthecellavisiondm96systemfordetectingredbloodcellmorphologicabnormalities
AT christophernaugler performanceofthecellavisiondm96systemfordetectingredbloodcellmorphologicabnormalities