Retrieval of Forest Structural Parameters from Terrestrial Laser Scanning: A Romanian Case Study

<i>Research Highlights:</i> The present study case investigates the differences occurring when tree’s biophysical parameters are extracted through single and multiple scans. Scan sessions covered mountainous and hill regions of the Carpathian forests. <i>Background and Objectives:&...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ionuț-Silviu Pascu, Alexandru-Claudiu Dobre, Ovidiu Badea, Mihai Andrei Tanase
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-04-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/11/4/392
_version_ 1797571647644893184
author Ionuț-Silviu Pascu
Alexandru-Claudiu Dobre
Ovidiu Badea
Mihai Andrei Tanase
author_facet Ionuț-Silviu Pascu
Alexandru-Claudiu Dobre
Ovidiu Badea
Mihai Andrei Tanase
author_sort Ionuț-Silviu Pascu
collection DOAJ
description <i>Research Highlights:</i> The present study case investigates the differences occurring when tree’s biophysical parameters are extracted through single and multiple scans. Scan sessions covered mountainous and hill regions of the Carpathian forests. <i>Background and Objectives:</i> We focused on analyzing stems, as a function of diameter at breast height (DBH) and the total height (H), at sample plot level for natural forests, with the purpose of assessing the potential for transitioning available methodology to field work in Romania. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> We performed single and multiple scans using a FARO Focus 3D X130 phase shift terrestrial laser scanner at 122 kpts and 0.3:0.15 mm noise compression ratio, resulting in an average point density of 6pts at 10m. The point cloud we obtained underpinned the DBH and heights analysis. In order to reach values similar to those measured in the field, we used both the original and the segmented point clouds, postprocessed in subsamples of different radii. <i>Results:</i> Pearson’s correlation coefficient above 0.8 for diameters showed high correlation with the field measurements. Diameter averages displayed differences within tolerances (0.02 m) for 10 out of 12 plots. Height analysis led to poorer results. For both acquisition methods, the values of the correlation coefficient peaked at 0.6. The initial hypothesis that trees positioned at a distance equivalent to their height can be measured more precise, was not valid; no increase in correlation strength was visible for either heights or diameters as the distance from scanner varied (<i>r</i> = 0.52). <i>Conclusions:</i> With regard to tree biophysical parameters extraction, the acquisition method has no major influence upon visible trees. We emphasize the term “visible”, as an increase in the number of acquisitions led to an increased number of detected trees (16% in old stands and 29% in young stands).
first_indexed 2024-03-10T20:44:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-21edd597c3944c76b99a615dfb42e1ec
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1999-4907
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T20:44:38Z
publishDate 2020-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Forests
spelling doaj.art-21edd597c3944c76b99a615dfb42e1ec2023-11-19T20:25:42ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072020-04-0111439210.3390/f11040392Retrieval of Forest Structural Parameters from Terrestrial Laser Scanning: A Romanian Case StudyIonuț-Silviu Pascu0Alexandru-Claudiu Dobre1Ovidiu Badea2Mihai Andrei Tanase3Department of Forest Monitoring, “Marin Drăcea“ Romanian National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry, 128 Eroilor Blvd., 077190 Voluntari, Ilfov, RomaniaDepartment of Forest Monitoring, “Marin Drăcea“ Romanian National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry, 128 Eroilor Blvd., 077190 Voluntari, Ilfov, RomaniaDepartment of Forest Monitoring, “Marin Drăcea“ Romanian National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry, 128 Eroilor Blvd., 077190 Voluntari, Ilfov, RomaniaDepartment of Geology, Geography and Environment, University of Alcala, 2 C. Colegios, 28801 Alcala de Henares, Spain<i>Research Highlights:</i> The present study case investigates the differences occurring when tree’s biophysical parameters are extracted through single and multiple scans. Scan sessions covered mountainous and hill regions of the Carpathian forests. <i>Background and Objectives:</i> We focused on analyzing stems, as a function of diameter at breast height (DBH) and the total height (H), at sample plot level for natural forests, with the purpose of assessing the potential for transitioning available methodology to field work in Romania. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> We performed single and multiple scans using a FARO Focus 3D X130 phase shift terrestrial laser scanner at 122 kpts and 0.3:0.15 mm noise compression ratio, resulting in an average point density of 6pts at 10m. The point cloud we obtained underpinned the DBH and heights analysis. In order to reach values similar to those measured in the field, we used both the original and the segmented point clouds, postprocessed in subsamples of different radii. <i>Results:</i> Pearson’s correlation coefficient above 0.8 for diameters showed high correlation with the field measurements. Diameter averages displayed differences within tolerances (0.02 m) for 10 out of 12 plots. Height analysis led to poorer results. For both acquisition methods, the values of the correlation coefficient peaked at 0.6. The initial hypothesis that trees positioned at a distance equivalent to their height can be measured more precise, was not valid; no increase in correlation strength was visible for either heights or diameters as the distance from scanner varied (<i>r</i> = 0.52). <i>Conclusions:</i> With regard to tree biophysical parameters extraction, the acquisition method has no major influence upon visible trees. We emphasize the term “visible”, as an increase in the number of acquisitions led to an increased number of detected trees (16% in old stands and 29% in young stands).https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/11/4/392TLSsingle scanmultiple scansbiophysical parameters
spellingShingle Ionuț-Silviu Pascu
Alexandru-Claudiu Dobre
Ovidiu Badea
Mihai Andrei Tanase
Retrieval of Forest Structural Parameters from Terrestrial Laser Scanning: A Romanian Case Study
Forests
TLS
single scan
multiple scans
biophysical parameters
title Retrieval of Forest Structural Parameters from Terrestrial Laser Scanning: A Romanian Case Study
title_full Retrieval of Forest Structural Parameters from Terrestrial Laser Scanning: A Romanian Case Study
title_fullStr Retrieval of Forest Structural Parameters from Terrestrial Laser Scanning: A Romanian Case Study
title_full_unstemmed Retrieval of Forest Structural Parameters from Terrestrial Laser Scanning: A Romanian Case Study
title_short Retrieval of Forest Structural Parameters from Terrestrial Laser Scanning: A Romanian Case Study
title_sort retrieval of forest structural parameters from terrestrial laser scanning a romanian case study
topic TLS
single scan
multiple scans
biophysical parameters
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/11/4/392
work_keys_str_mv AT ionutsilviupascu retrievalofforeststructuralparametersfromterrestriallaserscanningaromaniancasestudy
AT alexandruclaudiudobre retrievalofforeststructuralparametersfromterrestriallaserscanningaromaniancasestudy
AT ovidiubadea retrievalofforeststructuralparametersfromterrestriallaserscanningaromaniancasestudy
AT mihaiandreitanase retrievalofforeststructuralparametersfromterrestriallaserscanningaromaniancasestudy