Epistemic Immodesty and Embodied Rationality
ABSTRACT Based on Pritchard's distinction (2012, 2016) between favoring and discriminating epistemic grounds, and on how those grounds bear on the elimination of skeptical possibilities, I present the dream argument as a moderate skeptical possibility that can be reasonably motivated. In order...
Main Author: | Giovanni Rolla |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
|
Series: | Manuscrito |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452016000300005&lng=en&tlng=en |
Similar Items
-
Cartesian Skepticism, Kantian Skepticism, and the Dreaming Hypothesis
by: Antonio Ianni Segatto
Published: (2023-05-01) -
On the Knowledge of My Existence: Towards My Existence as the Adverbial Transcendent/Immanent
by: Shogo Shimizu
Published: (2023-12-01) -
Generalized Immodesty Principles in Epistemic Utility Theory
by: Alejandro Pérez Carballo
Published: (2023-12-01) -
Against the naturalness of skepticism about the external world: Wittgenstein and epistemic realism
by: Diego Rodríguez Téllez, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Nonsense and the General Form of the Sentence
by: Michael Morris
Published: (2025-01-01)