Modular endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic tumours of the proximal femur
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background and aims</p> <p>Endoprosthetic replacements of the proximal femur are commonly required to treat destructive metastases with either impending or actual pathological fractures at this site. Modular prostheses provide an off the shelf availab...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2008-11-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research |
| Online Access: | http://www.josr-online.com/content/3/1/50 |
| _version_ | 1811184755054477312 |
|---|---|
| author | Carter Simon R Grimer Robert J Chandrasekar Coonoor R Tillman Roger M Abudu Adesegun T |
| author_facet | Carter Simon R Grimer Robert J Chandrasekar Coonoor R Tillman Roger M Abudu Adesegun T |
| author_sort | Carter Simon R |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background and aims</p> <p>Endoprosthetic replacements of the proximal femur are commonly required to treat destructive metastases with either impending or actual pathological fractures at this site. Modular prostheses provide an off the shelf availability and can be adapted to most reconstructive situations for proximal femoral replacements. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and functional outcomes following modular tumour prosthesis reconstruction of the proximal femur in 100 consecutive patients with metastatic tumours and to compare them with the published results of patients with modular and custom made endoprosthetic replacements.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>100 consecutive patients who underwent modular tumour prosthetic reconstruction of the proximal femur for metastases using the METS system from 2001 to 2007 were studied. The patient, tumour and treatment factors in relation to overall survival, local control, implant survival and complications were analysed. Functional scores were obtained from surviving patients.</p> <p>Results and conclusion</p> <p>There were 45 male and 55 female patients. The mean age was 60.2 years. The indications were metastases. Seventy five patients presented with pathological fracture or with failed fixation and 25 patients were at a high risk of developing a fracture. The mean follow up was 15.9 months [range 0–77]. Three patients died within 2 weeks following surgery. 69 patients have died and 31 are alive. Of the 69 patients who were dead 68 did not need revision surgery indicating that the implant provided single definitive treatment which outlived the patient. There were three dislocations (2/5 with THR and 1/95 with unipolar femoral heads). 6 patients had deep infections. The estimated five year implant survival (Kaplan-Meier analysis) was 83.1% with revision as end point. The mean TESS score was 64% (54%–82%).</p> <p>We conclude that METS modular tumour prosthesis for proximal femur provides versatility; low implant related complications and acceptable function lasting the lifetime of the patients with metastatic tumours of the proximal femur.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T13:17:48Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-22321ba7932641caae16298101debf30 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1749-799X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T13:17:48Z |
| publishDate | 2008-11-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-22321ba7932641caae16298101debf302022-12-22T04:22:19ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2008-11-01315010.1186/1749-799X-3-50Modular endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic tumours of the proximal femurCarter Simon RGrimer Robert JChandrasekar Coonoor RTillman Roger MAbudu Adesegun T<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background and aims</p> <p>Endoprosthetic replacements of the proximal femur are commonly required to treat destructive metastases with either impending or actual pathological fractures at this site. Modular prostheses provide an off the shelf availability and can be adapted to most reconstructive situations for proximal femoral replacements. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and functional outcomes following modular tumour prosthesis reconstruction of the proximal femur in 100 consecutive patients with metastatic tumours and to compare them with the published results of patients with modular and custom made endoprosthetic replacements.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>100 consecutive patients who underwent modular tumour prosthetic reconstruction of the proximal femur for metastases using the METS system from 2001 to 2007 were studied. The patient, tumour and treatment factors in relation to overall survival, local control, implant survival and complications were analysed. Functional scores were obtained from surviving patients.</p> <p>Results and conclusion</p> <p>There were 45 male and 55 female patients. The mean age was 60.2 years. The indications were metastases. Seventy five patients presented with pathological fracture or with failed fixation and 25 patients were at a high risk of developing a fracture. The mean follow up was 15.9 months [range 0–77]. Three patients died within 2 weeks following surgery. 69 patients have died and 31 are alive. Of the 69 patients who were dead 68 did not need revision surgery indicating that the implant provided single definitive treatment which outlived the patient. There were three dislocations (2/5 with THR and 1/95 with unipolar femoral heads). 6 patients had deep infections. The estimated five year implant survival (Kaplan-Meier analysis) was 83.1% with revision as end point. The mean TESS score was 64% (54%–82%).</p> <p>We conclude that METS modular tumour prosthesis for proximal femur provides versatility; low implant related complications and acceptable function lasting the lifetime of the patients with metastatic tumours of the proximal femur.</p>http://www.josr-online.com/content/3/1/50 |
| spellingShingle | Carter Simon R Grimer Robert J Chandrasekar Coonoor R Tillman Roger M Abudu Adesegun T Modular endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic tumours of the proximal femur Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research |
| title | Modular endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic tumours of the proximal femur |
| title_full | Modular endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic tumours of the proximal femur |
| title_fullStr | Modular endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic tumours of the proximal femur |
| title_full_unstemmed | Modular endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic tumours of the proximal femur |
| title_short | Modular endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic tumours of the proximal femur |
| title_sort | modular endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic tumours of the proximal femur |
| url | http://www.josr-online.com/content/3/1/50 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT cartersimonr modularendoprostheticreplacementformetastatictumoursoftheproximalfemur AT grimerrobertj modularendoprostheticreplacementformetastatictumoursoftheproximalfemur AT chandrasekarcoonoorr modularendoprostheticreplacementformetastatictumoursoftheproximalfemur AT tillmanrogerm modularendoprostheticreplacementformetastatictumoursoftheproximalfemur AT abuduadesegunt modularendoprostheticreplacementformetastatictumoursoftheproximalfemur |