Clinical Sports Medicine & Orthopedics

Purpose: The current criterion to evaluate 30-second side hop (SH) test performance following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is limited to the absolute number of jumps, neglecting the quality of execution. This study aims to assess the relevance of spatiotemporal and force plate de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Urhausen AP, 2, Gette P, Mouton C, 4, Seil R, 3, Cabri J, 5, Theisen D
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Dynamic Media Sales Verlag 2022-02-01
Series:Deutsche Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin
Online Access:https://www.germanjournalsportsmedicine.com/archive/archive-2022/issue-1/an-in-depth-analysis-of-the-side-hop-test-in-patients-9-months-following-anterior-cruciate-ligament-reconstruction/
_version_ 1797787655240417280
author Urhausen AP
2
Gette P
Mouton C
4
Seil R
3
4
Cabri J
5
Theisen D
author_facet Urhausen AP
2
Gette P
Mouton C
4
Seil R
3
4
Cabri J
5
Theisen D
author_sort Urhausen AP
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: The current criterion to evaluate 30-second side hop (SH) test performance following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is limited to the absolute number of jumps, neglecting the quality of execution. This study aims to assess the relevance of spatiotemporal and force plate derived parameters during the SH test.Methods: Seventeen patients nine months post-surgery and 27 healthy controls were instructed to realize a maximal number of jumps during 30 seconds over a 40 cm-distance. Spatiotemporal and force plate derived variables were recorded from two force plates: number of jumps, flight time, contact time, jump distance, vertical impact force, average and instantaneous vertical loading rate. Group (patients and controls) by leg (non-operated/first tested and operated/second tested) interactions were tested using a mixed model analysis of variance.Results: Patients performed a similar number of jumps compared to controls. No differences were found for spatiotemporal and force plate derived parameters, neither for lateral nor medial jumps. High interindividual spread of impact peak forces existed in both groups.Discussion: Patients 9 months following ACLR and successful rehabilitation can safely perform strenuous lateral hops similar to controls. Although the force plate derived parameters during the SH test were normalized compared to controls, impact peak forces outlined particularly high loading parameters in some participants. Applying biomechanical analysis in association to the commonly used clinical parameters helps to point out individual and potentially harmful loading strategies during the SH test.Key Words: Return to Sports, Functional Performance, Biomechanics, Knee Injury
first_indexed 2024-03-13T01:25:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-22328524463c45ebbdb4f40504bc1a84
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0344-5925
2510-5264
language deu
last_indexed 2024-03-13T01:25:56Z
publishDate 2022-02-01
publisher Dynamic Media Sales Verlag
record_format Article
series Deutsche Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin
spelling doaj.art-22328524463c45ebbdb4f40504bc1a842023-07-04T17:04:28ZdeuDynamic Media Sales VerlagDeutsche Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin0344-59252510-52642022-02-0173110.5960/dzsm.2021.516309785Clinical Sports Medicine & OrthopedicsUrhausen AP2Gette PMouton C4Seil R34Cabri J5Theisen DPurpose: The current criterion to evaluate 30-second side hop (SH) test performance following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is limited to the absolute number of jumps, neglecting the quality of execution. This study aims to assess the relevance of spatiotemporal and force plate derived parameters during the SH test.Methods: Seventeen patients nine months post-surgery and 27 healthy controls were instructed to realize a maximal number of jumps during 30 seconds over a 40 cm-distance. Spatiotemporal and force plate derived variables were recorded from two force plates: number of jumps, flight time, contact time, jump distance, vertical impact force, average and instantaneous vertical loading rate. Group (patients and controls) by leg (non-operated/first tested and operated/second tested) interactions were tested using a mixed model analysis of variance.Results: Patients performed a similar number of jumps compared to controls. No differences were found for spatiotemporal and force plate derived parameters, neither for lateral nor medial jumps. High interindividual spread of impact peak forces existed in both groups.Discussion: Patients 9 months following ACLR and successful rehabilitation can safely perform strenuous lateral hops similar to controls. Although the force plate derived parameters during the SH test were normalized compared to controls, impact peak forces outlined particularly high loading parameters in some participants. Applying biomechanical analysis in association to the commonly used clinical parameters helps to point out individual and potentially harmful loading strategies during the SH test.Key Words: Return to Sports, Functional Performance, Biomechanics, Knee Injuryhttps://www.germanjournalsportsmedicine.com/archive/archive-2022/issue-1/an-in-depth-analysis-of-the-side-hop-test-in-patients-9-months-following-anterior-cruciate-ligament-reconstruction/
spellingShingle Urhausen AP
2
Gette P
Mouton C
4
Seil R
3
4
Cabri J
5
Theisen D
Clinical Sports Medicine & Orthopedics
Deutsche Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin
title Clinical Sports Medicine & Orthopedics
title_full Clinical Sports Medicine & Orthopedics
title_fullStr Clinical Sports Medicine & Orthopedics
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Sports Medicine & Orthopedics
title_short Clinical Sports Medicine & Orthopedics
title_sort clinical sports medicine amp orthopedics
url https://www.germanjournalsportsmedicine.com/archive/archive-2022/issue-1/an-in-depth-analysis-of-the-side-hop-test-in-patients-9-months-following-anterior-cruciate-ligament-reconstruction/
work_keys_str_mv AT urhausenap clinicalsportsmedicineamporthopedics
AT 2 clinicalsportsmedicineamporthopedics
AT gettep clinicalsportsmedicineamporthopedics
AT moutonc clinicalsportsmedicineamporthopedics
AT 4 clinicalsportsmedicineamporthopedics
AT seilr clinicalsportsmedicineamporthopedics
AT 3 clinicalsportsmedicineamporthopedics
AT 4 clinicalsportsmedicineamporthopedics
AT cabrij clinicalsportsmedicineamporthopedics
AT 5 clinicalsportsmedicineamporthopedics
AT theisend clinicalsportsmedicineamporthopedics