Contralateral Muscle Imbalances and Physiological Profile of Recreational Aerial Athletes

Background: Aerial fitness is quickly gaining popularity; however, little is known regarding the physiological demands of aerial athletes. The purpose of the study was to examine contralateral muscle imbalances, compare dominant versus non-dominant hamstrings-to-quadriceps (H:Q) ratios, and to estab...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rachel M. Ruggieri, Pablo B. Costa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-07-01
Series:Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5142/4/3/49
_version_ 1818444885327347712
author Rachel M. Ruggieri
Pablo B. Costa
author_facet Rachel M. Ruggieri
Pablo B. Costa
author_sort Rachel M. Ruggieri
collection DOAJ
description Background: Aerial fitness is quickly gaining popularity; however, little is known regarding the physiological demands of aerial athletes. The purpose of the study was to examine contralateral muscle imbalances, compare dominant versus non-dominant hamstrings-to-quadriceps (H:Q) ratios, and to establish a physiological profile of recreational aerial athletes. Methods: Thirteen aerialist women visited a local aerial studio to participate in a data collection session to examine isometric levels of upper and lower body strength, muscle endurance, flexibility, balance, and cardiovascular fitness. Results: No significant differences were found between dominant and non-dominant hand grip strength (<i>p</i> = 0.077), dominant and non-dominant isometric knee flexion (<i>p</i> = 0.483), dominant and non-dominant isometric knee extension (<i>p</i> = 0.152), or dominant and non-dominant isometric H:Q ratios (<i>p</i> = 0.102). In addition, no significant difference was found between isometric dominant H:Q ratio and the widely-used value of 0.60 (<i>p</i> = 0.139). However, isometric non-dominant H:Q ratio was significantly lower than the 0.60 criterion (<i>p</i> = 0.004). Aerial athletes demonstrated to have excellent flexibility, balance, cardiorespiratory fitness, and average strength. Conclusions: Aerial fitness may be another recreational activity that could be used to maintain higher levels of flexibility, balance, cardiorespiratory fitness, and strength. Aerialists may want to consider focusing on strengthening the lower body and balancing the hamstrings and quadriceps muscle strength.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T19:23:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-223d24f46afc496186bb745ce6a8e1ce
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2411-5142
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T19:23:02Z
publishDate 2019-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
spelling doaj.art-223d24f46afc496186bb745ce6a8e1ce2022-12-21T22:50:17ZengMDPI AGJournal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology2411-51422019-07-014349010.3390/jfmk4030049jfmk4030049Contralateral Muscle Imbalances and Physiological Profile of Recreational Aerial AthletesRachel M. Ruggieri0Pablo B. Costa1Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, California State University, Fullerton, CA 92831, USAExercise Physiology Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, California State University, Fullerton, CA 92831, USABackground: Aerial fitness is quickly gaining popularity; however, little is known regarding the physiological demands of aerial athletes. The purpose of the study was to examine contralateral muscle imbalances, compare dominant versus non-dominant hamstrings-to-quadriceps (H:Q) ratios, and to establish a physiological profile of recreational aerial athletes. Methods: Thirteen aerialist women visited a local aerial studio to participate in a data collection session to examine isometric levels of upper and lower body strength, muscle endurance, flexibility, balance, and cardiovascular fitness. Results: No significant differences were found between dominant and non-dominant hand grip strength (<i>p</i> = 0.077), dominant and non-dominant isometric knee flexion (<i>p</i> = 0.483), dominant and non-dominant isometric knee extension (<i>p</i> = 0.152), or dominant and non-dominant isometric H:Q ratios (<i>p</i> = 0.102). In addition, no significant difference was found between isometric dominant H:Q ratio and the widely-used value of 0.60 (<i>p</i> = 0.139). However, isometric non-dominant H:Q ratio was significantly lower than the 0.60 criterion (<i>p</i> = 0.004). Aerial athletes demonstrated to have excellent flexibility, balance, cardiorespiratory fitness, and average strength. Conclusions: Aerial fitness may be another recreational activity that could be used to maintain higher levels of flexibility, balance, cardiorespiratory fitness, and strength. Aerialists may want to consider focusing on strengthening the lower body and balancing the hamstrings and quadriceps muscle strength.https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5142/4/3/49circus artistscircus actsaerial silksaerial hoopaerial fitnessacrobats
spellingShingle Rachel M. Ruggieri
Pablo B. Costa
Contralateral Muscle Imbalances and Physiological Profile of Recreational Aerial Athletes
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
circus artists
circus acts
aerial silks
aerial hoop
aerial fitness
acrobats
title Contralateral Muscle Imbalances and Physiological Profile of Recreational Aerial Athletes
title_full Contralateral Muscle Imbalances and Physiological Profile of Recreational Aerial Athletes
title_fullStr Contralateral Muscle Imbalances and Physiological Profile of Recreational Aerial Athletes
title_full_unstemmed Contralateral Muscle Imbalances and Physiological Profile of Recreational Aerial Athletes
title_short Contralateral Muscle Imbalances and Physiological Profile of Recreational Aerial Athletes
title_sort contralateral muscle imbalances and physiological profile of recreational aerial athletes
topic circus artists
circus acts
aerial silks
aerial hoop
aerial fitness
acrobats
url https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5142/4/3/49
work_keys_str_mv AT rachelmruggieri contralateralmuscleimbalancesandphysiologicalprofileofrecreationalaerialathletes
AT pablobcosta contralateralmuscleimbalancesandphysiologicalprofileofrecreationalaerialathletes