A Discourse on Restorative Practice—Participants’ Views of a Divergent Ideology
This study is a discourse on restorative practice as a divergent epistemological ideology. It explores the field of restorative practice (RP) through thematic analysis of discursive captures from restorative practitioners and researchers within or associated with the Global Alliance for Restorative...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-11-01
|
| Series: | Laws |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/11/6/86 |
| _version_ | 1797456705471119360 |
|---|---|
| author | Thomas Procter-Legg |
| author_facet | Thomas Procter-Legg |
| author_sort | Thomas Procter-Legg |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This study is a discourse on restorative practice as a divergent epistemological ideology. It explores the field of restorative practice (RP) through thematic analysis of discursive captures from restorative practitioners and researchers within or associated with the Global Alliance for Restorative Justice and Social Justice. It includes elements of what could loosely be considered ethnographic research due to the time spent within restorative spaces, whilst analysing and processing the data. Methods include a restorative approach to research design, using online surveys as prerequisites to in-depth semi structured dialogic interviews. This led to reflexive thematic analysis, whereby three themes were constructed: the importance of congruence; evolution finding spaces for cultivation; and decentralising restorative practice through radical action. It is understood that this study takes a post positivist stance, designed to produce a discourse of participants’ views on RP as a divergent ideology. It is designed to highlight the perceptions of participants from a highly invested group and to promote a wider understanding of how RP interacts with dominant cultures. It would therefore be of interest to those implementing or growing restorative ideas within organisations. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T16:11:42Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-2240c73c53d549ecbbacf618c22aff29 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2075-471X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-09T16:11:42Z |
| publishDate | 2022-11-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Laws |
| spelling | doaj.art-2240c73c53d549ecbbacf618c22aff292023-11-24T16:10:49ZengMDPI AGLaws2075-471X2022-11-011168610.3390/laws11060086A Discourse on Restorative Practice—Participants’ Views of a Divergent IdeologyThomas Procter-Legg0Department of Educational Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW, UKThis study is a discourse on restorative practice as a divergent epistemological ideology. It explores the field of restorative practice (RP) through thematic analysis of discursive captures from restorative practitioners and researchers within or associated with the Global Alliance for Restorative Justice and Social Justice. It includes elements of what could loosely be considered ethnographic research due to the time spent within restorative spaces, whilst analysing and processing the data. Methods include a restorative approach to research design, using online surveys as prerequisites to in-depth semi structured dialogic interviews. This led to reflexive thematic analysis, whereby three themes were constructed: the importance of congruence; evolution finding spaces for cultivation; and decentralising restorative practice through radical action. It is understood that this study takes a post positivist stance, designed to produce a discourse of participants’ views on RP as a divergent ideology. It is designed to highlight the perceptions of participants from a highly invested group and to promote a wider understanding of how RP interacts with dominant cultures. It would therefore be of interest to those implementing or growing restorative ideas within organisations.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/11/6/86restorative practicerestorative justiceculturedivergent ideologyeducationsocial justice |
| spellingShingle | Thomas Procter-Legg A Discourse on Restorative Practice—Participants’ Views of a Divergent Ideology Laws restorative practice restorative justice culture divergent ideology education social justice |
| title | A Discourse on Restorative Practice—Participants’ Views of a Divergent Ideology |
| title_full | A Discourse on Restorative Practice—Participants’ Views of a Divergent Ideology |
| title_fullStr | A Discourse on Restorative Practice—Participants’ Views of a Divergent Ideology |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Discourse on Restorative Practice—Participants’ Views of a Divergent Ideology |
| title_short | A Discourse on Restorative Practice—Participants’ Views of a Divergent Ideology |
| title_sort | discourse on restorative practice participants views of a divergent ideology |
| topic | restorative practice restorative justice culture divergent ideology education social justice |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/11/6/86 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT thomasprocterlegg adiscourseonrestorativepracticeparticipantsviewsofadivergentideology AT thomasprocterlegg discourseonrestorativepracticeparticipantsviewsofadivergentideology |