Facial profile and frontal changes after bimaxillary surgery in patients with mandibular prognathism

Background/Purpose: Patients are always concerned about their postoperative appearance before surgery for facial deformity correction. The present study investigated the facial profile and frontal changes following two-jaw surgery. Methods: Forty patients who underwent two-jaw surgery were divided b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chun-Ming Chen, Michael Yuan-Chien Chen, Jung-Hsuan Cheng, Kwei-Jing Chen, Yu-Chuan Tseng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-07-01
Series:Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664617301717
_version_ 1818947765531574272
author Chun-Ming Chen
Michael Yuan-Chien Chen
Jung-Hsuan Cheng
Kwei-Jing Chen
Yu-Chuan Tseng
author_facet Chun-Ming Chen
Michael Yuan-Chien Chen
Jung-Hsuan Cheng
Kwei-Jing Chen
Yu-Chuan Tseng
author_sort Chun-Ming Chen
collection DOAJ
description Background/Purpose: Patients are always concerned about their postoperative appearance before surgery for facial deformity correction. The present study investigated the facial profile and frontal changes following two-jaw surgery. Methods: Forty patients who underwent two-jaw surgery were divided by the amount of mandibular setback (group I: ≤8 mm and group II: >8 mm). Cephalometric radiograms (lateral and frontal) were collected and analyzed at three intervals: preoperatively (T1), immediately postoperatively (T2), and final follow-up (T3). The following points were identified: cheek points (C1–C5), pronasale (Prn, tip of the nose), anterior nasal spine (ANS), subnasal (Sn), point A, labrale superius (Ls), incision superius (Is), labrale inferius (Li), incision inferius (Ii), point B, labiomental sulcus (Si), pogonion (Pog), soft tissue pogonion (PogS), ramus point (RP), and gonion (Go). The immediate postoperative changes (T21), final postoperative changes (T32), and final stability (T31) were calculated and analyzed. Results: In T31, the cheek line showed significant advancements of 2.3 mm (group I) and 1.6 mm (group II). The soft:hard tissue ratios were significantly correlated: Prn:ANS (0.37:1), Prn:A (0.39:1), Sn:A (0.85:1), C3:A (0.82:1), Ls:Is (0.92:1), Li:Ii (0.91:1), Si:B (0.88:1), and PogS:Pog (group I, 0.78:1 and group II, 0.93:1). The intercondylion and intergonial widths of group II (T31) significantly increased 1.8 and 4 mm, respectively. Regarding the postoperative skeletal stability (T32), group I showed significant correlations between amounts of mandibular setback, but group II did not. Conclusion: In the facial profile, the cheek line showed significant advancement postoperatively. The frontal mandibular transverse dimensions were significantly increased. Keywords: Facial profile, Frontal dimension, LeFort I operation, Mandibular prognathism, Sagittal split ramus osteotomy, Relapse
first_indexed 2024-12-20T08:36:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-22462aaaf5e24e588f8c555f5dd4e6f4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0929-6646
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T08:36:06Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
spelling doaj.art-22462aaaf5e24e588f8c555f5dd4e6f42022-12-21T19:46:33ZengElsevierJournal of the Formosan Medical Association0929-66462018-07-011177632639Facial profile and frontal changes after bimaxillary surgery in patients with mandibular prognathismChun-Ming Chen0Michael Yuan-Chien Chen1Jung-Hsuan Cheng2Kwei-Jing Chen3Yu-Chuan Tseng4Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; School of Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, TaiwanDepartment of Dentistry, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; School of Dentistry, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, TaiwanSchool of Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Orthodontics, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, TaiwanDepartment of Dentistry, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, TaiwanSchool of Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Orthodontics, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Corresponding author. Department of Orthodontics, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, No. 100, Shih-Chuan 1st Road, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan. Fax: +886 7 3221510.Background/Purpose: Patients are always concerned about their postoperative appearance before surgery for facial deformity correction. The present study investigated the facial profile and frontal changes following two-jaw surgery. Methods: Forty patients who underwent two-jaw surgery were divided by the amount of mandibular setback (group I: ≤8 mm and group II: >8 mm). Cephalometric radiograms (lateral and frontal) were collected and analyzed at three intervals: preoperatively (T1), immediately postoperatively (T2), and final follow-up (T3). The following points were identified: cheek points (C1–C5), pronasale (Prn, tip of the nose), anterior nasal spine (ANS), subnasal (Sn), point A, labrale superius (Ls), incision superius (Is), labrale inferius (Li), incision inferius (Ii), point B, labiomental sulcus (Si), pogonion (Pog), soft tissue pogonion (PogS), ramus point (RP), and gonion (Go). The immediate postoperative changes (T21), final postoperative changes (T32), and final stability (T31) were calculated and analyzed. Results: In T31, the cheek line showed significant advancements of 2.3 mm (group I) and 1.6 mm (group II). The soft:hard tissue ratios were significantly correlated: Prn:ANS (0.37:1), Prn:A (0.39:1), Sn:A (0.85:1), C3:A (0.82:1), Ls:Is (0.92:1), Li:Ii (0.91:1), Si:B (0.88:1), and PogS:Pog (group I, 0.78:1 and group II, 0.93:1). The intercondylion and intergonial widths of group II (T31) significantly increased 1.8 and 4 mm, respectively. Regarding the postoperative skeletal stability (T32), group I showed significant correlations between amounts of mandibular setback, but group II did not. Conclusion: In the facial profile, the cheek line showed significant advancement postoperatively. The frontal mandibular transverse dimensions were significantly increased. Keywords: Facial profile, Frontal dimension, LeFort I operation, Mandibular prognathism, Sagittal split ramus osteotomy, Relapsehttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664617301717
spellingShingle Chun-Ming Chen
Michael Yuan-Chien Chen
Jung-Hsuan Cheng
Kwei-Jing Chen
Yu-Chuan Tseng
Facial profile and frontal changes after bimaxillary surgery in patients with mandibular prognathism
Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
title Facial profile and frontal changes after bimaxillary surgery in patients with mandibular prognathism
title_full Facial profile and frontal changes after bimaxillary surgery in patients with mandibular prognathism
title_fullStr Facial profile and frontal changes after bimaxillary surgery in patients with mandibular prognathism
title_full_unstemmed Facial profile and frontal changes after bimaxillary surgery in patients with mandibular prognathism
title_short Facial profile and frontal changes after bimaxillary surgery in patients with mandibular prognathism
title_sort facial profile and frontal changes after bimaxillary surgery in patients with mandibular prognathism
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664617301717
work_keys_str_mv AT chunmingchen facialprofileandfrontalchangesafterbimaxillarysurgeryinpatientswithmandibularprognathism
AT michaelyuanchienchen facialprofileandfrontalchangesafterbimaxillarysurgeryinpatientswithmandibularprognathism
AT junghsuancheng facialprofileandfrontalchangesafterbimaxillarysurgeryinpatientswithmandibularprognathism
AT kweijingchen facialprofileandfrontalchangesafterbimaxillarysurgeryinpatientswithmandibularprognathism
AT yuchuantseng facialprofileandfrontalchangesafterbimaxillarysurgeryinpatientswithmandibularprognathism