How to Make Analytic Science-Engaged Theology an ASSET
This paper explores the relationship between analytic theology and science-engaged theology through a historical lens, connecting contemporary disagreements between analytic metaphysicians and philosophers of science to a disagreement about philosophical method between Carnap and Quine. After discu...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Catholic University of Louvain
2023-01-01
|
Series: | TheoLogica |
Online Access: | https://bdd.rdplf.org/index.php/theologica/article/view/63153 |
_version_ | 1828063888273309696 |
---|---|
author | Meghan Page |
author_facet | Meghan Page |
author_sort | Meghan Page |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
This paper explores the relationship between analytic theology and science-engaged theology through a historical lens, connecting contemporary disagreements between analytic metaphysicians and philosophers of science to a disagreement about philosophical method between Carnap and Quine. After discussing philosophical issues of meaning and verification in early positivism, the paper goes on to suggest that the analytic-synthetic distinction underlying much work in analytic theology is difficult to maintain when engaging with empirical methods of knowledge production such as science. To move forward, then, analytic theologians who wish to pursue science-engaged theology need a constructive methodology that embraces a blurring of the analytic-synthetic distinction. A rough sketch of one such research program, analytic-synthetic science-engaged theology, is offered as a potential ASSET for systematic theologians who wish to engage with natural and human sciences.
|
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T22:51:14Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-22469c4521824e4f94df983fa9457184 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2593-0265 |
language | deu |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T22:51:14Z |
publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
publisher | Catholic University of Louvain |
record_format | Article |
series | TheoLogica |
spelling | doaj.art-22469c4521824e4f94df983fa94571842023-01-15T06:53:19ZdeuCatholic University of LouvainTheoLogica2593-02652023-01-017110.14428/thl.v7i1.63153How to Make Analytic Science-Engaged Theology an ASSETMeghan Page0Loyola University Maryland This paper explores the relationship between analytic theology and science-engaged theology through a historical lens, connecting contemporary disagreements between analytic metaphysicians and philosophers of science to a disagreement about philosophical method between Carnap and Quine. After discussing philosophical issues of meaning and verification in early positivism, the paper goes on to suggest that the analytic-synthetic distinction underlying much work in analytic theology is difficult to maintain when engaging with empirical methods of knowledge production such as science. To move forward, then, analytic theologians who wish to pursue science-engaged theology need a constructive methodology that embraces a blurring of the analytic-synthetic distinction. A rough sketch of one such research program, analytic-synthetic science-engaged theology, is offered as a potential ASSET for systematic theologians who wish to engage with natural and human sciences. https://bdd.rdplf.org/index.php/theologica/article/view/63153 |
spellingShingle | Meghan Page How to Make Analytic Science-Engaged Theology an ASSET TheoLogica |
title | How to Make Analytic Science-Engaged Theology an ASSET |
title_full | How to Make Analytic Science-Engaged Theology an ASSET |
title_fullStr | How to Make Analytic Science-Engaged Theology an ASSET |
title_full_unstemmed | How to Make Analytic Science-Engaged Theology an ASSET |
title_short | How to Make Analytic Science-Engaged Theology an ASSET |
title_sort | how to make analytic science engaged theology an asset |
url | https://bdd.rdplf.org/index.php/theologica/article/view/63153 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meghanpage howtomakeanalyticscienceengagedtheologyanasset |