Equivalence relations as an analysis criterion of scientific relevance of analytical categories
<div class="page" title="Page 1"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p><span>The aim of this paper is to propose equivalence relations as a structural criterion or analytical order, through which the functions of knowledg...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universidad Católica de Colombia
2017-07-01
|
| Series: | Acta Colombiana de Psicología |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/ojsucatolica/revistas_ucatolica/index.php/acta-colombiana-psicologia/article/view/1500 |
| _version_ | 1818312640988971008 |
|---|---|
| author | Tiberio Pérez Manrique Ernesto L. Ravelo C. |
| author_facet | Tiberio Pérez Manrique Ernesto L. Ravelo C. |
| author_sort | Tiberio Pérez Manrique |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <div class="page" title="Page 1"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p><span>The aim of this paper is to propose equivalence relations as a structural criterion or analytical order, through which the functions of knowledge required in a scientific activity are delimited. It begins by considering knowledge as a phenomenon studied by psychology, whose explanation requires giving an account of the way in which such behavioral or knowledge functions are established, organized and updated. It is considered that the procedures of matching—to-sample allow understanding the way of abstracting the analytical categories that scientifically structure the knowledge of reality. When using these procedures, new relationships are derived that without the need for direct training, cannot be explained based on principles of stimulus generalization, but rather as equivalent relations differentiated through previous training. They get a closure in an analytical category, once the categorical criteria are abstracted or if desired, when these relationships are nominated. And when categorized or nominated, they transcend the situation, since nominating is understood as an adjustment to conventional criteria. Once situational interactions are nominated, they regulate all social practices, including practices of scientific knowledge.</span></p></div></div></div> |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-13T08:21:04Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-226561114e5b44079e03abbfa15d1e17 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0123-9155 1909-9711 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-13T08:21:04Z |
| publishDate | 2017-07-01 |
| publisher | Universidad Católica de Colombia |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Acta Colombiana de Psicología |
| spelling | doaj.art-226561114e5b44079e03abbfa15d1e172022-12-21T23:54:01ZengUniversidad Católica de ColombiaActa Colombiana de Psicología0123-91551909-97112017-07-012022532611086Equivalence relations as an analysis criterion of scientific relevance of analytical categoriesTiberio Pérez Manrique0Ernesto L. Ravelo C.1Universidad Católica de ColombiaUniversidad Católica de Colombia<div class="page" title="Page 1"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p><span>The aim of this paper is to propose equivalence relations as a structural criterion or analytical order, through which the functions of knowledge required in a scientific activity are delimited. It begins by considering knowledge as a phenomenon studied by psychology, whose explanation requires giving an account of the way in which such behavioral or knowledge functions are established, organized and updated. It is considered that the procedures of matching—to-sample allow understanding the way of abstracting the analytical categories that scientifically structure the knowledge of reality. When using these procedures, new relationships are derived that without the need for direct training, cannot be explained based on principles of stimulus generalization, but rather as equivalent relations differentiated through previous training. They get a closure in an analytical category, once the categorical criteria are abstracted or if desired, when these relationships are nominated. And when categorized or nominated, they transcend the situation, since nominating is understood as an adjustment to conventional criteria. Once situational interactions are nominated, they regulate all social practices, including practices of scientific knowledge.</span></p></div></div></div>https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/ojsucatolica/revistas_ucatolica/index.php/acta-colombiana-psicologia/article/view/1500Conocimiento científicorelaciones de equivalenciacategoría analítica |
| spellingShingle | Tiberio Pérez Manrique Ernesto L. Ravelo C. Equivalence relations as an analysis criterion of scientific relevance of analytical categories Acta Colombiana de Psicología Conocimiento científico relaciones de equivalencia categoría analítica |
| title | Equivalence relations as an analysis criterion of scientific relevance of analytical categories |
| title_full | Equivalence relations as an analysis criterion of scientific relevance of analytical categories |
| title_fullStr | Equivalence relations as an analysis criterion of scientific relevance of analytical categories |
| title_full_unstemmed | Equivalence relations as an analysis criterion of scientific relevance of analytical categories |
| title_short | Equivalence relations as an analysis criterion of scientific relevance of analytical categories |
| title_sort | equivalence relations as an analysis criterion of scientific relevance of analytical categories |
| topic | Conocimiento científico relaciones de equivalencia categoría analítica |
| url | https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/ojsucatolica/revistas_ucatolica/index.php/acta-colombiana-psicologia/article/view/1500 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tiberioperezmanrique equivalencerelationsasananalysiscriterionofscientificrelevanceofanalyticalcategories AT ernestolraveloc equivalencerelationsasananalysiscriterionofscientificrelevanceofanalyticalcategories |