Limitations to the Use of Species-Distribution Models for Environmental-Impact Assessments in the Amazon.

Species-distribution models (SDM) are tools with potential to inform environmental-impact studies (EIA). However, they are not always appropriate and may result in improper and expensive mitigation and compensation if their limitations are not understood by decision makers. Here, we examine the use...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lorena Ribeiro de A Carneiro, Albertina P Lima, Ricardo B Machado, William E Magnusson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4718640?pdf=render
_version_ 1818151562132848640
author Lorena Ribeiro de A Carneiro
Albertina P Lima
Ricardo B Machado
William E Magnusson
author_facet Lorena Ribeiro de A Carneiro
Albertina P Lima
Ricardo B Machado
William E Magnusson
author_sort Lorena Ribeiro de A Carneiro
collection DOAJ
description Species-distribution models (SDM) are tools with potential to inform environmental-impact studies (EIA). However, they are not always appropriate and may result in improper and expensive mitigation and compensation if their limitations are not understood by decision makers. Here, we examine the use of SDM for frogs that were used in impact assessment using data obtained from the EIA of a hydroelectric project located in the Amazon Basin in Brazil. The results show that lack of knowledge of species distributions limits the appropriate use of SDM in the Amazon region for most target species. Because most of these targets are newly described and their distributions poorly known, data about their distributions are insufficient to be effectively used in SDM. Surveys that are mandatory for the EIA are often conducted only near the area under assessment, and so models must extrapolate well beyond the sampled area to inform decisions made at much larger spatial scales, such as defining areas to be used to offset the negative effects of the projects. Using distributions of better-known species in simulations, we show that geographical-extrapolations based on limited information of species ranges often lead to spurious results. We conclude that the use of SDM as evidence to support project-licensing decisions in the Amazon requires much greater area sampling for impact studies, or, alternatively, integrated and comparative survey strategies, to improve biodiversity sampling. When more detailed distribution information is unavailable, SDM will produce results that generate uncertain and untestable decisions regarding impact assessment. In many cases, SDM is unlikely to be better than the use of expert opinion.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T13:40:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-226633743f624c2e9197447c9da2a8a0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T13:40:48Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-226633743f624c2e9197447c9da2a8a02022-12-22T01:04:47ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01111e014654310.1371/journal.pone.0146543Limitations to the Use of Species-Distribution Models for Environmental-Impact Assessments in the Amazon.Lorena Ribeiro de A CarneiroAlbertina P LimaRicardo B MachadoWilliam E MagnussonSpecies-distribution models (SDM) are tools with potential to inform environmental-impact studies (EIA). However, they are not always appropriate and may result in improper and expensive mitigation and compensation if their limitations are not understood by decision makers. Here, we examine the use of SDM for frogs that were used in impact assessment using data obtained from the EIA of a hydroelectric project located in the Amazon Basin in Brazil. The results show that lack of knowledge of species distributions limits the appropriate use of SDM in the Amazon region for most target species. Because most of these targets are newly described and their distributions poorly known, data about their distributions are insufficient to be effectively used in SDM. Surveys that are mandatory for the EIA are often conducted only near the area under assessment, and so models must extrapolate well beyond the sampled area to inform decisions made at much larger spatial scales, such as defining areas to be used to offset the negative effects of the projects. Using distributions of better-known species in simulations, we show that geographical-extrapolations based on limited information of species ranges often lead to spurious results. We conclude that the use of SDM as evidence to support project-licensing decisions in the Amazon requires much greater area sampling for impact studies, or, alternatively, integrated and comparative survey strategies, to improve biodiversity sampling. When more detailed distribution information is unavailable, SDM will produce results that generate uncertain and untestable decisions regarding impact assessment. In many cases, SDM is unlikely to be better than the use of expert opinion.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4718640?pdf=render
spellingShingle Lorena Ribeiro de A Carneiro
Albertina P Lima
Ricardo B Machado
William E Magnusson
Limitations to the Use of Species-Distribution Models for Environmental-Impact Assessments in the Amazon.
PLoS ONE
title Limitations to the Use of Species-Distribution Models for Environmental-Impact Assessments in the Amazon.
title_full Limitations to the Use of Species-Distribution Models for Environmental-Impact Assessments in the Amazon.
title_fullStr Limitations to the Use of Species-Distribution Models for Environmental-Impact Assessments in the Amazon.
title_full_unstemmed Limitations to the Use of Species-Distribution Models for Environmental-Impact Assessments in the Amazon.
title_short Limitations to the Use of Species-Distribution Models for Environmental-Impact Assessments in the Amazon.
title_sort limitations to the use of species distribution models for environmental impact assessments in the amazon
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4718640?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT lorenaribeirodeacarneiro limitationstotheuseofspeciesdistributionmodelsforenvironmentalimpactassessmentsintheamazon
AT albertinaplima limitationstotheuseofspeciesdistributionmodelsforenvironmentalimpactassessmentsintheamazon
AT ricardobmachado limitationstotheuseofspeciesdistributionmodelsforenvironmentalimpactassessmentsintheamazon
AT williamemagnusson limitationstotheuseofspeciesdistributionmodelsforenvironmentalimpactassessmentsintheamazon