Long-term outcomes of follicular variant vs classic papillary thyroid carcinoma

The majority of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) cases comprise classic papillary (C-PTC) and follicular variant (FV-PTC) histologic sub-types. Historically, clinical equivalency was assumed, but recent data suggest C-PTC may have poorer outcomes. However, large single-institution series with long-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lauren E Henke, John D Pfeifer, Thomas J Baranski, Todd DeWees, Perry W Grigsby
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bioscientifica 2018-11-01
Series:Endocrine Connections
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ec.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/ec/7/12/EC-18-0264.xml
_version_ 1798045093523881984
author Lauren E Henke
John D Pfeifer
Thomas J Baranski
Todd DeWees
Perry W Grigsby
author_facet Lauren E Henke
John D Pfeifer
Thomas J Baranski
Todd DeWees
Perry W Grigsby
author_sort Lauren E Henke
collection DOAJ
description The majority of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) cases comprise classic papillary (C-PTC) and follicular variant (FV-PTC) histologic sub-types. Historically, clinical equivalency was assumed, but recent data suggest C-PTC may have poorer outcomes. However, large single-institution series with long-term outcomes of C-PTC and FV-PTC, using modern pathologic criteria for FV-PTC, are needed. Our objective was to compare prevalence and impact of clinicopathologic factors, including BRAF mutation status, on long-term outcomes of C-PTC and FV-PTC. We hypothesized that patients with C-PTC would have higher risk disease features and worse survival outcomes. This retrospective study included 1293 patients treated at a single, US academic institution between 1943 and 2009 with mean follow-up of 8.6 years. All patients underwent either partial or total thyroidectomy and had invasive C-PTC or FV-PTC per modern pathology criteria. Primary study measurements included differences in recurrence-free survival (RFS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and associations with clinicopathologic factors including the BRAF mutation. Compared to FV-PTC, C-PTC was associated with multiple features of high-risk disease (P < 0.05) and significantly reduced RFS and DSS. Survival differences were consistent across univariate, multivariate and Kaplan–Meier analyses. BRAF mutations were more common in C-PTC (P = 0.002). However, on Kaplan–Meier analysis, mutational status did not significantly impact RFS or DSS for patients with either histologic sub-type. C-PTC therefore indicates higher-risk disease and predicts for significantly poorer long-term outcomes when compared to FV-PTC. The nature of this difference in outcome is not explained by traditional histopathologic findings or by the BRAF mutation.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T23:14:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2272820b235b40dbafc26b47e85c641c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2049-3614
2049-3614
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T23:14:59Z
publishDate 2018-11-01
publisher Bioscientifica
record_format Article
series Endocrine Connections
spelling doaj.art-2272820b235b40dbafc26b47e85c641c2022-12-22T03:57:38ZengBioscientificaEndocrine Connections2049-36142049-36142018-11-0171212261235https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-18-0264Long-term outcomes of follicular variant vs classic papillary thyroid carcinomaLauren E Henke0John D Pfeifer1Thomas J Baranski2Todd DeWees3Perry W Grigsby4Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USADepartment of Pathology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USADivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USADivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USAThe majority of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) cases comprise classic papillary (C-PTC) and follicular variant (FV-PTC) histologic sub-types. Historically, clinical equivalency was assumed, but recent data suggest C-PTC may have poorer outcomes. However, large single-institution series with long-term outcomes of C-PTC and FV-PTC, using modern pathologic criteria for FV-PTC, are needed. Our objective was to compare prevalence and impact of clinicopathologic factors, including BRAF mutation status, on long-term outcomes of C-PTC and FV-PTC. We hypothesized that patients with C-PTC would have higher risk disease features and worse survival outcomes. This retrospective study included 1293 patients treated at a single, US academic institution between 1943 and 2009 with mean follow-up of 8.6 years. All patients underwent either partial or total thyroidectomy and had invasive C-PTC or FV-PTC per modern pathology criteria. Primary study measurements included differences in recurrence-free survival (RFS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and associations with clinicopathologic factors including the BRAF mutation. Compared to FV-PTC, C-PTC was associated with multiple features of high-risk disease (P < 0.05) and significantly reduced RFS and DSS. Survival differences were consistent across univariate, multivariate and Kaplan–Meier analyses. BRAF mutations were more common in C-PTC (P = 0.002). However, on Kaplan–Meier analysis, mutational status did not significantly impact RFS or DSS for patients with either histologic sub-type. C-PTC therefore indicates higher-risk disease and predicts for significantly poorer long-term outcomes when compared to FV-PTC. The nature of this difference in outcome is not explained by traditional histopathologic findings or by the BRAF mutation.https://ec.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/ec/7/12/EC-18-0264.xmlclassic papillary thyroid carcinomafollicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinomaBRAF mutationC-PTCFV-PTC
spellingShingle Lauren E Henke
John D Pfeifer
Thomas J Baranski
Todd DeWees
Perry W Grigsby
Long-term outcomes of follicular variant vs classic papillary thyroid carcinoma
Endocrine Connections
classic papillary thyroid carcinoma
follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma
BRAF mutation
C-PTC
FV-PTC
title Long-term outcomes of follicular variant vs classic papillary thyroid carcinoma
title_full Long-term outcomes of follicular variant vs classic papillary thyroid carcinoma
title_fullStr Long-term outcomes of follicular variant vs classic papillary thyroid carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Long-term outcomes of follicular variant vs classic papillary thyroid carcinoma
title_short Long-term outcomes of follicular variant vs classic papillary thyroid carcinoma
title_sort long term outcomes of follicular variant vs classic papillary thyroid carcinoma
topic classic papillary thyroid carcinoma
follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma
BRAF mutation
C-PTC
FV-PTC
url https://ec.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/ec/7/12/EC-18-0264.xml
work_keys_str_mv AT laurenehenke longtermoutcomesoffollicularvariantvsclassicpapillarythyroidcarcinoma
AT johndpfeifer longtermoutcomesoffollicularvariantvsclassicpapillarythyroidcarcinoma
AT thomasjbaranski longtermoutcomesoffollicularvariantvsclassicpapillarythyroidcarcinoma
AT todddewees longtermoutcomesoffollicularvariantvsclassicpapillarythyroidcarcinoma
AT perrywgrigsby longtermoutcomesoffollicularvariantvsclassicpapillarythyroidcarcinoma