Diagnostic performance of an automated microscopy and pH test for diagnosis of vaginitis

Abstract Vaginitis is a common gynecological problem, nevertheless, its clinical evaluation is often insufficient. This study evaluated the performance of an automated microscope for the diagnosis of vaginitis, by comparison of the investigated test results to a composite reference standard (CRS) of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahinoam Lev-Sagie, Doris Strauss, Avraham Ben Chetrit
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-04-01
Series:npj Digital Medicine
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00815-w
_version_ 1797556214261874688
author Ahinoam Lev-Sagie
Doris Strauss
Avraham Ben Chetrit
author_facet Ahinoam Lev-Sagie
Doris Strauss
Avraham Ben Chetrit
author_sort Ahinoam Lev-Sagie
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Vaginitis is a common gynecological problem, nevertheless, its clinical evaluation is often insufficient. This study evaluated the performance of an automated microscope for the diagnosis of vaginitis, by comparison of the investigated test results to a composite reference standard (CRS) of wet mount microscopy performed by a specialist in vulvovaginal disorders, and related laboratory tests. During this single-site cross-sectional prospective study, 226 women reporting vaginitis symptoms were recruited, of which 192 samples were found interpretable and were assessed by the automated microscopy system. Results showed sensitivity between 84.1% (95%CI: 73.67–90.86%) for Candida albicans and 90.9% (95%CI: 76.43–96.86%) for bacterial vaginosis and specificity between 65.9% (95%CI: 57.11–73.64%) for Candida albicans and 99.4% (95%CI: 96.89–99.90%) for cytolytic vaginosis. These findings demonstrate the marked potential of machine learning-based automated microscopy and an automated pH test of vaginal swabs as a basis for a computer-aided suggested diagnosis, for improving the first-line evaluation of five different types of infectious and non-infectious vaginal disorders (vaginal atrophy, bacterial vaginosis, Candida albicans vaginitis, cytolytic vaginosis, and aerobic vaginitis/desquamative inflammatory vaginitis). Using such a tool will hopefully lead to better treatment, decrease healthcare costs, and improve patients’ quality of life.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T16:59:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2272b58fb07a4884a1cbccfdf55cf401
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2398-6352
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T16:59:38Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series npj Digital Medicine
spelling doaj.art-2272b58fb07a4884a1cbccfdf55cf4012023-11-20T11:01:04ZengNature Portfolionpj Digital Medicine2398-63522023-04-01611710.1038/s41746-023-00815-wDiagnostic performance of an automated microscopy and pH test for diagnosis of vaginitisAhinoam Lev-Sagie0Doris Strauss1Avraham Ben Chetrit2Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of JerusalemClalit Health OrganizationClalit Health OrganizationAbstract Vaginitis is a common gynecological problem, nevertheless, its clinical evaluation is often insufficient. This study evaluated the performance of an automated microscope for the diagnosis of vaginitis, by comparison of the investigated test results to a composite reference standard (CRS) of wet mount microscopy performed by a specialist in vulvovaginal disorders, and related laboratory tests. During this single-site cross-sectional prospective study, 226 women reporting vaginitis symptoms were recruited, of which 192 samples were found interpretable and were assessed by the automated microscopy system. Results showed sensitivity between 84.1% (95%CI: 73.67–90.86%) for Candida albicans and 90.9% (95%CI: 76.43–96.86%) for bacterial vaginosis and specificity between 65.9% (95%CI: 57.11–73.64%) for Candida albicans and 99.4% (95%CI: 96.89–99.90%) for cytolytic vaginosis. These findings demonstrate the marked potential of machine learning-based automated microscopy and an automated pH test of vaginal swabs as a basis for a computer-aided suggested diagnosis, for improving the first-line evaluation of five different types of infectious and non-infectious vaginal disorders (vaginal atrophy, bacterial vaginosis, Candida albicans vaginitis, cytolytic vaginosis, and aerobic vaginitis/desquamative inflammatory vaginitis). Using such a tool will hopefully lead to better treatment, decrease healthcare costs, and improve patients’ quality of life.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00815-w
spellingShingle Ahinoam Lev-Sagie
Doris Strauss
Avraham Ben Chetrit
Diagnostic performance of an automated microscopy and pH test for diagnosis of vaginitis
npj Digital Medicine
title Diagnostic performance of an automated microscopy and pH test for diagnosis of vaginitis
title_full Diagnostic performance of an automated microscopy and pH test for diagnosis of vaginitis
title_fullStr Diagnostic performance of an automated microscopy and pH test for diagnosis of vaginitis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic performance of an automated microscopy and pH test for diagnosis of vaginitis
title_short Diagnostic performance of an automated microscopy and pH test for diagnosis of vaginitis
title_sort diagnostic performance of an automated microscopy and ph test for diagnosis of vaginitis
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00815-w
work_keys_str_mv AT ahinoamlevsagie diagnosticperformanceofanautomatedmicroscopyandphtestfordiagnosisofvaginitis
AT dorisstrauss diagnosticperformanceofanautomatedmicroscopyandphtestfordiagnosisofvaginitis
AT avrahambenchetrit diagnosticperformanceofanautomatedmicroscopyandphtestfordiagnosisofvaginitis