Comparison of Snellen and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts using a computer simulation

AIM: To compare accuracy, reproducibility and test duration for the Snellen and the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts, two main tools used to measure visual acuity (VA). METHODS: A computer simulation was programmed to run multiple virtual patients, each with a unique set of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reuben R. Shamir, Yael Friedman, Leo Joskowicz, Michael Mimouni, Eytan Z. Blumenthal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS) 2016-01-01
Series:International Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijo.cn/en_publish/2016/1/20160120.pdf
_version_ 1818272312064999424
author Reuben R. Shamir
Yael Friedman
Leo Joskowicz
Michael Mimouni
Eytan Z. Blumenthal
author_facet Reuben R. Shamir
Yael Friedman
Leo Joskowicz
Michael Mimouni
Eytan Z. Blumenthal
author_sort Reuben R. Shamir
collection DOAJ
description AIM: To compare accuracy, reproducibility and test duration for the Snellen and the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts, two main tools used to measure visual acuity (VA). METHODS: A computer simulation was programmed to run multiple virtual patients, each with a unique set of assigned parameters, including VA, false-positive and false-negative error values. For each virtual patient, assigned VA was randomly chosen along a continuous scale spanning the range between 1.0 to 0.0 logMAR units (equivalent to 20/200 to 20/20). Each of 30 000 virtual patients were run ten times on each of the two VA charts. RESULTS: Average test duration (expressed as the total number of characters presented during the test ±SD) was 12.6±11.1 and 31.2±14.7 characters, for the Snellen and ETDRS, respectively. Accuracy, defined as the absolute difference (± SD) between the assigned VA and the measured VA, expressed in logMAR units, was superior in the ETDRS charts: 0.12±0.14 and 0.08±0.08, for the Snellen and ETDRS charts, respectively. Reproducibility, expressed as test-retest variability, was superior in the ETDRS charts: 0.23±0.17 and 0.11±0.09 logMAR units, for the Snellen and ETDRS charts, respectively. CONCLUSION: A comparison of true (assigned) VA to measured VA, demonstrated, on average, better accuracy and reproducibility of the ETDRS chart, but at the penalty of significantly longer test duration. These differences were most pronounced in the low VA range. The reproducibility using a simulation approach is in line with reproducibility values found in several clinical studies.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T21:40:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-22804b1d1a9d4b38b0867523806c62a1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2222-3959
2227-4898
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T21:40:04Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)
record_format Article
series International Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-22804b1d1a9d4b38b0867523806c62a12022-12-22T00:11:04ZengPress of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)International Journal of Ophthalmology2222-39592227-48982016-01-019111912310.18240/ijo.2016.01.20Comparison of Snellen and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts using a computer simulationReuben R. Shamir0Yael Friedman1Leo Joskowicz2Michael Mimouni3Eytan Z. Blumenthal4School of Engineering and Computer Science, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah – Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.School of Engineering and Computer Science, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.Department of Ophthalmology, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa 31096, Israel.Department of Ophthalmology, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa 31096, Israel.AIM: To compare accuracy, reproducibility and test duration for the Snellen and the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts, two main tools used to measure visual acuity (VA). METHODS: A computer simulation was programmed to run multiple virtual patients, each with a unique set of assigned parameters, including VA, false-positive and false-negative error values. For each virtual patient, assigned VA was randomly chosen along a continuous scale spanning the range between 1.0 to 0.0 logMAR units (equivalent to 20/200 to 20/20). Each of 30 000 virtual patients were run ten times on each of the two VA charts. RESULTS: Average test duration (expressed as the total number of characters presented during the test ±SD) was 12.6±11.1 and 31.2±14.7 characters, for the Snellen and ETDRS, respectively. Accuracy, defined as the absolute difference (± SD) between the assigned VA and the measured VA, expressed in logMAR units, was superior in the ETDRS charts: 0.12±0.14 and 0.08±0.08, for the Snellen and ETDRS charts, respectively. Reproducibility, expressed as test-retest variability, was superior in the ETDRS charts: 0.23±0.17 and 0.11±0.09 logMAR units, for the Snellen and ETDRS charts, respectively. CONCLUSION: A comparison of true (assigned) VA to measured VA, demonstrated, on average, better accuracy and reproducibility of the ETDRS chart, but at the penalty of significantly longer test duration. These differences were most pronounced in the low VA range. The reproducibility using a simulation approach is in line with reproducibility values found in several clinical studies.http://www.ijo.cn/en_publish/2016/1/20160120.pdfEarly Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy StudySnellencomputer simulationvisual acuity testingvirtual patients
spellingShingle Reuben R. Shamir
Yael Friedman
Leo Joskowicz
Michael Mimouni
Eytan Z. Blumenthal
Comparison of Snellen and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts using a computer simulation
International Journal of Ophthalmology
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study
Snellen
computer simulation
visual acuity testing
virtual patients
title Comparison of Snellen and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts using a computer simulation
title_full Comparison of Snellen and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts using a computer simulation
title_fullStr Comparison of Snellen and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts using a computer simulation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Snellen and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts using a computer simulation
title_short Comparison of Snellen and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts using a computer simulation
title_sort comparison of snellen and early treatment diabetic retinopathy study charts using a computer simulation
topic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study
Snellen
computer simulation
visual acuity testing
virtual patients
url http://www.ijo.cn/en_publish/2016/1/20160120.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT reubenrshamir comparisonofsnellenandearlytreatmentdiabeticretinopathystudychartsusingacomputersimulation
AT yaelfriedman comparisonofsnellenandearlytreatmentdiabeticretinopathystudychartsusingacomputersimulation
AT leojoskowicz comparisonofsnellenandearlytreatmentdiabeticretinopathystudychartsusingacomputersimulation
AT michaelmimouni comparisonofsnellenandearlytreatmentdiabeticretinopathystudychartsusingacomputersimulation
AT eytanzblumenthal comparisonofsnellenandearlytreatmentdiabeticretinopathystudychartsusingacomputersimulation