Methodology for Neural Network-Based Material Card Calibration Using LS-DYNA <i>MAT_187_SAMP-1</i> Considering Failure with GISSMO

A neural network (NN)-based method is presented in this paper which allows the identification of parameters for material cards used in Finite Element simulations. Contrary to the conventionally used computationally intensive material parameter identification (MPI) by numerical optimization with inte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paul Meißner, Jens Winter, Thomas Vietor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-01-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/15/2/643
_version_ 1797492342208331776
author Paul Meißner
Jens Winter
Thomas Vietor
author_facet Paul Meißner
Jens Winter
Thomas Vietor
author_sort Paul Meißner
collection DOAJ
description A neural network (NN)-based method is presented in this paper which allows the identification of parameters for material cards used in Finite Element simulations. Contrary to the conventionally used computationally intensive material parameter identification (MPI) by numerical optimization with internal or commercial software, a machine learning (ML)-based method is time saving when used repeatedly. Within this article, a self-developed ML-based Python framework is presented, which offers advantages, especially in the development of structural components in early development phases. In this procedure, different machine learning methods are used and adapted to the specific MPI problem considered herein. Using the developed NN-based and the common optimization-based method with LS-OPT, the material parameters of the LS-DYNA material card <i>MAT_187_SAMP-1</i> and the failure model <i>GISSMO</i> were exemplarily calibrated for a virtually generated test dataset. Parameters for the description of elasticity, plasticity, tension–compression asymmetry, variable plastic Poisson’s ratio (VPPR), strain rate dependency and failure were taken into account. The focus of this paper is on performing a comparative study of the two different MPI methods with varying settings (algorithms, hyperparameters, etc.). Furthermore, the applicability of the NN-based procedure for the specific usage of both material cards was investigated. The studies reveal the general applicability for the calibration of a complex material card by the example of the used <i>MAT_187_SAMP-1</i>.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T01:02:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2280746c9d124d9d84e48fe83b3dd942
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1944
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T01:02:17Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Materials
spelling doaj.art-2280746c9d124d9d84e48fe83b3dd9422023-11-23T14:32:33ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442022-01-0115264310.3390/ma15020643Methodology for Neural Network-Based Material Card Calibration Using LS-DYNA <i>MAT_187_SAMP-1</i> Considering Failure with GISSMOPaul Meißner0Jens Winter1Thomas Vietor2Institute for Engineering Design, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Hermann-Blenk-Strasse 42, 38108 Brunswick, GermanyInstitute for Engineering Design, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Hermann-Blenk-Strasse 42, 38108 Brunswick, GermanyInstitute for Engineering Design, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Hermann-Blenk-Strasse 42, 38108 Brunswick, GermanyA neural network (NN)-based method is presented in this paper which allows the identification of parameters for material cards used in Finite Element simulations. Contrary to the conventionally used computationally intensive material parameter identification (MPI) by numerical optimization with internal or commercial software, a machine learning (ML)-based method is time saving when used repeatedly. Within this article, a self-developed ML-based Python framework is presented, which offers advantages, especially in the development of structural components in early development phases. In this procedure, different machine learning methods are used and adapted to the specific MPI problem considered herein. Using the developed NN-based and the common optimization-based method with LS-OPT, the material parameters of the LS-DYNA material card <i>MAT_187_SAMP-1</i> and the failure model <i>GISSMO</i> were exemplarily calibrated for a virtually generated test dataset. Parameters for the description of elasticity, plasticity, tension–compression asymmetry, variable plastic Poisson’s ratio (VPPR), strain rate dependency and failure were taken into account. The focus of this paper is on performing a comparative study of the two different MPI methods with varying settings (algorithms, hyperparameters, etc.). Furthermore, the applicability of the NN-based procedure for the specific usage of both material cards was investigated. The studies reveal the general applicability for the calibration of a complex material card by the example of the used <i>MAT_187_SAMP-1</i>.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/15/2/643parameter identificationmachine learninghyperparameter optimizationLS-DYNA<i>MAT_187_SAMP-1</i>GISSMO failure model
spellingShingle Paul Meißner
Jens Winter
Thomas Vietor
Methodology for Neural Network-Based Material Card Calibration Using LS-DYNA <i>MAT_187_SAMP-1</i> Considering Failure with GISSMO
Materials
parameter identification
machine learning
hyperparameter optimization
LS-DYNA
<i>MAT_187_SAMP-1</i>
GISSMO failure model
title Methodology for Neural Network-Based Material Card Calibration Using LS-DYNA <i>MAT_187_SAMP-1</i> Considering Failure with GISSMO
title_full Methodology for Neural Network-Based Material Card Calibration Using LS-DYNA <i>MAT_187_SAMP-1</i> Considering Failure with GISSMO
title_fullStr Methodology for Neural Network-Based Material Card Calibration Using LS-DYNA <i>MAT_187_SAMP-1</i> Considering Failure with GISSMO
title_full_unstemmed Methodology for Neural Network-Based Material Card Calibration Using LS-DYNA <i>MAT_187_SAMP-1</i> Considering Failure with GISSMO
title_short Methodology for Neural Network-Based Material Card Calibration Using LS-DYNA <i>MAT_187_SAMP-1</i> Considering Failure with GISSMO
title_sort methodology for neural network based material card calibration using ls dyna i mat 187 samp 1 i considering failure with gissmo
topic parameter identification
machine learning
hyperparameter optimization
LS-DYNA
<i>MAT_187_SAMP-1</i>
GISSMO failure model
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/15/2/643
work_keys_str_mv AT paulmeißner methodologyforneuralnetworkbasedmaterialcardcalibrationusinglsdynaimat187samp1iconsideringfailurewithgissmo
AT jenswinter methodologyforneuralnetworkbasedmaterialcardcalibrationusinglsdynaimat187samp1iconsideringfailurewithgissmo
AT thomasvietor methodologyforneuralnetworkbasedmaterialcardcalibrationusinglsdynaimat187samp1iconsideringfailurewithgissmo