Limited versus Radical Resection in Mitral Valve Infective Endocarditis Surgery

<i>Background:</i> Mitral valve repair is preferred in patients undergoing surgical treatment for infective endocarditis (IE) of the native mitral valve, however, radical resection of infected tissue and patch-plasty might potentially lead to low or non-durable repair. We aimed to compar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zaki Haidari, Daniel Wendt, Matthias Thielmann, Heinz Jakob, Arjang Ruhparwar, Mohamed El-Gabry
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-03-01
Series:Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2308-3425/10/4/146
_version_ 1797604926607589376
author Zaki Haidari
Daniel Wendt
Matthias Thielmann
Heinz Jakob
Arjang Ruhparwar
Mohamed El-Gabry
author_facet Zaki Haidari
Daniel Wendt
Matthias Thielmann
Heinz Jakob
Arjang Ruhparwar
Mohamed El-Gabry
author_sort Zaki Haidari
collection DOAJ
description <i>Background:</i> Mitral valve repair is preferred in patients undergoing surgical treatment for infective endocarditis (IE) of the native mitral valve, however, radical resection of infected tissue and patch-plasty might potentially lead to low or non-durable repair. We aimed to compare a limited-resection and non-patch technique with the classic radical-resection technique. <i>Methods:</i> Eligible candidates were patients with definitive IE of the native mitral valve undergoing surgery between January 2013 and December 2018. Patients were classified according to the surgical strategy into two groups: limited- versus radical-resection strategy. Propensity score matching was used. Endpoints were repair rate, all-cause mortality (30-day and 2-year), re-endocarditis and reoperation at q-year follow-up. <i>Results:</i> After propensity score matching, 90 patients were included. Follow-up was 100% complete. Mitral valve repair rate was 84% in the limited-resection versus 18% in the radical-resection strategy, <i>p</i> < 0.001. The 30-day and 2-year mortality were 20% versus 13% (<i>p</i> = 0.396) and 33% versus 27% (<i>p</i> = 0.490) in the limited-resection versus radical-resection strategy, respectively. The incidence of re-endocarditis during the 2-year follow-up was 4% in the limited-resection strategy versus 9% in the radical-resection strategy, <i>p</i> = 0.677. Three patients in the limited-resection strategy underwent reoperation of the mitral valve, while there were none in the radical-resection strategy (<i>p</i> = 0.242). <i>Conclusions:</i> Although mortality in patients with IE of the native mitral valve remains high, the limited-resection and non-patch surgical strategy is associated with a significantly higher repair rates with comparable 30-day and mid-term mortality, risk of re-endocarditis and re-operation compared to the radical-resection strategy.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T04:53:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-228b5b2952f64c809a8241b1414ce5a3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2308-3425
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T04:53:46Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
spelling doaj.art-228b5b2952f64c809a8241b1414ce5a32023-11-17T19:47:28ZengMDPI AGJournal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease2308-34252023-03-0110414610.3390/jcdd10040146Limited versus Radical Resection in Mitral Valve Infective Endocarditis SurgeryZaki Haidari0Daniel Wendt1Matthias Thielmann2Heinz Jakob3Arjang Ruhparwar4Mohamed El-Gabry5Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, West German Heart and Vascular Centre Essen, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, GermanyDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, West German Heart and Vascular Centre Essen, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, GermanyDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, West German Heart and Vascular Centre Essen, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, GermanyDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, West German Heart and Vascular Centre Essen, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, GermanyDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, West German Heart and Vascular Centre Essen, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, GermanyDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, West German Heart and Vascular Centre Essen, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany<i>Background:</i> Mitral valve repair is preferred in patients undergoing surgical treatment for infective endocarditis (IE) of the native mitral valve, however, radical resection of infected tissue and patch-plasty might potentially lead to low or non-durable repair. We aimed to compare a limited-resection and non-patch technique with the classic radical-resection technique. <i>Methods:</i> Eligible candidates were patients with definitive IE of the native mitral valve undergoing surgery between January 2013 and December 2018. Patients were classified according to the surgical strategy into two groups: limited- versus radical-resection strategy. Propensity score matching was used. Endpoints were repair rate, all-cause mortality (30-day and 2-year), re-endocarditis and reoperation at q-year follow-up. <i>Results:</i> After propensity score matching, 90 patients were included. Follow-up was 100% complete. Mitral valve repair rate was 84% in the limited-resection versus 18% in the radical-resection strategy, <i>p</i> < 0.001. The 30-day and 2-year mortality were 20% versus 13% (<i>p</i> = 0.396) and 33% versus 27% (<i>p</i> = 0.490) in the limited-resection versus radical-resection strategy, respectively. The incidence of re-endocarditis during the 2-year follow-up was 4% in the limited-resection strategy versus 9% in the radical-resection strategy, <i>p</i> = 0.677. Three patients in the limited-resection strategy underwent reoperation of the mitral valve, while there were none in the radical-resection strategy (<i>p</i> = 0.242). <i>Conclusions:</i> Although mortality in patients with IE of the native mitral valve remains high, the limited-resection and non-patch surgical strategy is associated with a significantly higher repair rates with comparable 30-day and mid-term mortality, risk of re-endocarditis and re-operation compared to the radical-resection strategy.https://www.mdpi.com/2308-3425/10/4/146infective endocarditismitral valvecardiac surgerylimited-resectionradical-resection
spellingShingle Zaki Haidari
Daniel Wendt
Matthias Thielmann
Heinz Jakob
Arjang Ruhparwar
Mohamed El-Gabry
Limited versus Radical Resection in Mitral Valve Infective Endocarditis Surgery
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
infective endocarditis
mitral valve
cardiac surgery
limited-resection
radical-resection
title Limited versus Radical Resection in Mitral Valve Infective Endocarditis Surgery
title_full Limited versus Radical Resection in Mitral Valve Infective Endocarditis Surgery
title_fullStr Limited versus Radical Resection in Mitral Valve Infective Endocarditis Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Limited versus Radical Resection in Mitral Valve Infective Endocarditis Surgery
title_short Limited versus Radical Resection in Mitral Valve Infective Endocarditis Surgery
title_sort limited versus radical resection in mitral valve infective endocarditis surgery
topic infective endocarditis
mitral valve
cardiac surgery
limited-resection
radical-resection
url https://www.mdpi.com/2308-3425/10/4/146
work_keys_str_mv AT zakihaidari limitedversusradicalresectioninmitralvalveinfectiveendocarditissurgery
AT danielwendt limitedversusradicalresectioninmitralvalveinfectiveendocarditissurgery
AT matthiasthielmann limitedversusradicalresectioninmitralvalveinfectiveendocarditissurgery
AT heinzjakob limitedversusradicalresectioninmitralvalveinfectiveendocarditissurgery
AT arjangruhparwar limitedversusradicalresectioninmitralvalveinfectiveendocarditissurgery
AT mohamedelgabry limitedversusradicalresectioninmitralvalveinfectiveendocarditissurgery