The role of social capital in explaining mental health inequalities between immigrants and Swedish-born: a population-based cross-sectional study

Abstract Background Social capital may theoretically explain health inequalities between social groups, but empirical evidence is lacking. Some studies indicate that social capital may be particularly important for immigrant health. Nearly 16% of Sweden’s population are foreign-born immigrants and r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charisse M. Johnson, Mikael Rostila, Anna C. Svensson, Karin Engström
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-01-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-016-3955-3
_version_ 1811273958318669824
author Charisse M. Johnson
Mikael Rostila
Anna C. Svensson
Karin Engström
author_facet Charisse M. Johnson
Mikael Rostila
Anna C. Svensson
Karin Engström
author_sort Charisse M. Johnson
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Social capital may theoretically explain health inequalities between social groups, but empirical evidence is lacking. Some studies indicate that social capital may be particularly important for immigrant health. Nearly 16% of Sweden’s population are foreign-born immigrants and research has shown them to be susceptible to psychological distress, though significant variation has been found between groups. In this study, we investigate the following hypotheses: 1) if non-refugees have better mental health than Swedish-born, and refugees experience worse mental health than Swedish-born; 2) if mental health status converges with that of Swedish-born with longer duration of residence; and 3) if social capital mediates the effect of immigrant status on psychological distress for different immigrant groups as compared to Swedish-born. Methods This cross-sectional study uses baseline data from the Stockholm Public Health Cohort and includes 50,498 randomly-selected individuals from Stockholm County in 2002, 2006, and 2010. Mental health was measured as psychological distress, using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire. Social capital was measured using indicators of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital. Both cognitive and structural aspects were measured for the latter two indicators. Mediation was tested using logistic regression and the Sobel test. Results The results show that refugees generally had greater odds of psychological distress than non-refugees compared to their respective Swedish-born counterparts. Among immigrant men, both refugees and non-refugees had significantly greater odds of psychological distress than Swedish-born men. Only refugee women in Sweden 10 years or more had significantly greater odds of psychological distress compared to Swedish-born women. The mediation analysis demonstrated that indicators of social capital mediated the association for all immigrant men (except non-refugees in Sweden 3-9 years) and for refugee women in Sweden 10 years or more. While bonding social capital showed the greatest mediatory role among the three social capital types, adding them together had the strongest explanatory effect. Conclusions Social capital explains differences in mental health for some immigrant groups, highlighting its role as a potentially important post-migration factor. Increased investment from policy-makers regarding how social capital can be promoted among new arrivals may be important for preventing psychological distress.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T23:09:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-228bb1a25af44e89a63dcb439b97c3ac
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2458
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T23:09:05Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj.art-228bb1a25af44e89a63dcb439b97c3ac2022-12-22T03:12:50ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582017-01-0117111510.1186/s12889-016-3955-3The role of social capital in explaining mental health inequalities between immigrants and Swedish-born: a population-based cross-sectional studyCharisse M. Johnson0Mikael Rostila1Anna C. Svensson2Karin Engström3Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Widerströmska HusetCentre for Health Equity Studies, Stockholm University/Karolinska Institutet Sveavägen 160Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Widerströmska HusetDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Widerströmska HusetAbstract Background Social capital may theoretically explain health inequalities between social groups, but empirical evidence is lacking. Some studies indicate that social capital may be particularly important for immigrant health. Nearly 16% of Sweden’s population are foreign-born immigrants and research has shown them to be susceptible to psychological distress, though significant variation has been found between groups. In this study, we investigate the following hypotheses: 1) if non-refugees have better mental health than Swedish-born, and refugees experience worse mental health than Swedish-born; 2) if mental health status converges with that of Swedish-born with longer duration of residence; and 3) if social capital mediates the effect of immigrant status on psychological distress for different immigrant groups as compared to Swedish-born. Methods This cross-sectional study uses baseline data from the Stockholm Public Health Cohort and includes 50,498 randomly-selected individuals from Stockholm County in 2002, 2006, and 2010. Mental health was measured as psychological distress, using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire. Social capital was measured using indicators of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital. Both cognitive and structural aspects were measured for the latter two indicators. Mediation was tested using logistic regression and the Sobel test. Results The results show that refugees generally had greater odds of psychological distress than non-refugees compared to their respective Swedish-born counterparts. Among immigrant men, both refugees and non-refugees had significantly greater odds of psychological distress than Swedish-born men. Only refugee women in Sweden 10 years or more had significantly greater odds of psychological distress compared to Swedish-born women. The mediation analysis demonstrated that indicators of social capital mediated the association for all immigrant men (except non-refugees in Sweden 3-9 years) and for refugee women in Sweden 10 years or more. While bonding social capital showed the greatest mediatory role among the three social capital types, adding them together had the strongest explanatory effect. Conclusions Social capital explains differences in mental health for some immigrant groups, highlighting its role as a potentially important post-migration factor. Increased investment from policy-makers regarding how social capital can be promoted among new arrivals may be important for preventing psychological distress.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-016-3955-3Mental healthSocial capitalImmigrantsRefugeesInequalitiesDuration of residence
spellingShingle Charisse M. Johnson
Mikael Rostila
Anna C. Svensson
Karin Engström
The role of social capital in explaining mental health inequalities between immigrants and Swedish-born: a population-based cross-sectional study
BMC Public Health
Mental health
Social capital
Immigrants
Refugees
Inequalities
Duration of residence
title The role of social capital in explaining mental health inequalities between immigrants and Swedish-born: a population-based cross-sectional study
title_full The role of social capital in explaining mental health inequalities between immigrants and Swedish-born: a population-based cross-sectional study
title_fullStr The role of social capital in explaining mental health inequalities between immigrants and Swedish-born: a population-based cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed The role of social capital in explaining mental health inequalities between immigrants and Swedish-born: a population-based cross-sectional study
title_short The role of social capital in explaining mental health inequalities between immigrants and Swedish-born: a population-based cross-sectional study
title_sort role of social capital in explaining mental health inequalities between immigrants and swedish born a population based cross sectional study
topic Mental health
Social capital
Immigrants
Refugees
Inequalities
Duration of residence
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-016-3955-3
work_keys_str_mv AT charissemjohnson theroleofsocialcapitalinexplainingmentalhealthinequalitiesbetweenimmigrantsandswedishbornapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT mikaelrostila theroleofsocialcapitalinexplainingmentalhealthinequalitiesbetweenimmigrantsandswedishbornapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT annacsvensson theroleofsocialcapitalinexplainingmentalhealthinequalitiesbetweenimmigrantsandswedishbornapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT karinengstrom theroleofsocialcapitalinexplainingmentalhealthinequalitiesbetweenimmigrantsandswedishbornapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT charissemjohnson roleofsocialcapitalinexplainingmentalhealthinequalitiesbetweenimmigrantsandswedishbornapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT mikaelrostila roleofsocialcapitalinexplainingmentalhealthinequalitiesbetweenimmigrantsandswedishbornapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT annacsvensson roleofsocialcapitalinexplainingmentalhealthinequalitiesbetweenimmigrantsandswedishbornapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT karinengstrom roleofsocialcapitalinexplainingmentalhealthinequalitiesbetweenimmigrantsandswedishbornapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy