Integrating phenotype ontologies with PhenomeNET

Abstract Background Integration and analysis of phenotype data from humans and model organisms is a key challenge in building our understanding of normal biology and pathophysiology. However, the range of phenotypes and anatomical details being captured in clinical and model organism databases prese...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Miguel Ángel Rodríguez-García, Georgios V. Gkoutos, Paul N. Schofield, Robert Hoehndorf
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-12-01
Series:Journal of Biomedical Semantics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13326-017-0167-4
_version_ 1819115893197635584
author Miguel Ángel Rodríguez-García
Georgios V. Gkoutos
Paul N. Schofield
Robert Hoehndorf
author_facet Miguel Ángel Rodríguez-García
Georgios V. Gkoutos
Paul N. Schofield
Robert Hoehndorf
author_sort Miguel Ángel Rodríguez-García
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Integration and analysis of phenotype data from humans and model organisms is a key challenge in building our understanding of normal biology and pathophysiology. However, the range of phenotypes and anatomical details being captured in clinical and model organism databases presents complex problems when attempting to match classes across species and across phenotypes as diverse as behaviour and neoplasia. We have previously developed PhenomeNET, a system for disease gene prioritization that includes as one of its components an ontology designed to integrate phenotype ontologies. While not applicable to matching arbitrary ontologies, PhenomeNET can be used to identify related phenotypes in different species, including human, mouse, zebrafish, nematode worm, fruit fly, and yeast. Results Here, we apply the PhenomeNET to identify related classes from two phenotype and two disease ontologies using automated reasoning. We demonstrate that we can identify a large number of mappings, some of which require automated reasoning and cannot easily be identified through lexical approaches alone. Combining automated reasoning with lexical matching further improves results in aligning ontologies. Conclusions PhenomeNET can be used to align and integrate phenotype ontologies. The results can be utilized for biomedical analyses in which phenomena observed in model organisms are used to identify causative genes and mutations underlying human disease.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T05:08:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-22a42f40b8c547babdc92ab743e2f6ac
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2041-1480
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T05:08:25Z
publishDate 2017-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Biomedical Semantics
spelling doaj.art-22a42f40b8c547babdc92ab743e2f6ac2022-12-21T18:38:02ZengBMCJournal of Biomedical Semantics2041-14802017-12-018111110.1186/s13326-017-0167-4Integrating phenotype ontologies with PhenomeNETMiguel Ángel Rodríguez-García0Georgios V. Gkoutos1Paul N. Schofield2Robert Hoehndorf3Computational Bioscience Research Center (CBRC), King Abdullah University of Science and TechnologyCollege of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, Centre for Computational Biology, University of BirminghamDepartment of Physiology, Development & Neuroscience, University of CambridgeComputational Bioscience Research Center (CBRC), King Abdullah University of Science and TechnologyAbstract Background Integration and analysis of phenotype data from humans and model organisms is a key challenge in building our understanding of normal biology and pathophysiology. However, the range of phenotypes and anatomical details being captured in clinical and model organism databases presents complex problems when attempting to match classes across species and across phenotypes as diverse as behaviour and neoplasia. We have previously developed PhenomeNET, a system for disease gene prioritization that includes as one of its components an ontology designed to integrate phenotype ontologies. While not applicable to matching arbitrary ontologies, PhenomeNET can be used to identify related phenotypes in different species, including human, mouse, zebrafish, nematode worm, fruit fly, and yeast. Results Here, we apply the PhenomeNET to identify related classes from two phenotype and two disease ontologies using automated reasoning. We demonstrate that we can identify a large number of mappings, some of which require automated reasoning and cannot easily be identified through lexical approaches alone. Combining automated reasoning with lexical matching further improves results in aligning ontologies. Conclusions PhenomeNET can be used to align and integrate phenotype ontologies. The results can be utilized for biomedical analyses in which phenomena observed in model organisms are used to identify causative genes and mutations underlying human disease.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13326-017-0167-4PhenotypePhenomeNETDisease gene prioritizationOWLAutomated reasoning
spellingShingle Miguel Ángel Rodríguez-García
Georgios V. Gkoutos
Paul N. Schofield
Robert Hoehndorf
Integrating phenotype ontologies with PhenomeNET
Journal of Biomedical Semantics
Phenotype
PhenomeNET
Disease gene prioritization
OWL
Automated reasoning
title Integrating phenotype ontologies with PhenomeNET
title_full Integrating phenotype ontologies with PhenomeNET
title_fullStr Integrating phenotype ontologies with PhenomeNET
title_full_unstemmed Integrating phenotype ontologies with PhenomeNET
title_short Integrating phenotype ontologies with PhenomeNET
title_sort integrating phenotype ontologies with phenomenet
topic Phenotype
PhenomeNET
Disease gene prioritization
OWL
Automated reasoning
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13326-017-0167-4
work_keys_str_mv AT miguelangelrodriguezgarcia integratingphenotypeontologieswithphenomenet
AT georgiosvgkoutos integratingphenotypeontologieswithphenomenet
AT paulnschofield integratingphenotypeontologieswithphenomenet
AT roberthoehndorf integratingphenotypeontologieswithphenomenet