Caution is needed in interpreting the results of comparative studies regarding oncological operations by minimally invasive versus laparotomic access
ABSTRACT We aim to alert the difference between groups while comparing studies of abdominal oncological operations performed either by minimally invasive or laparotomic approaches and potential conflicts of interest in presenting or interpreting the results. Considering the large volume of scientifi...
Main Authors: | PEDRO RICARDO DE OLIVEIRA FERNANDES, FRANCISCO AMÉRICO FERNANDES NETO, DURVAL RENATO WOHNRATH, VINÍCIUS DE LIMA VAZQUEZ |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
|
Series: | Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912020000100702&tlng=pt |
Similar Items
-
Laparoscopic and Laparotomic Restaging in Patients With Apparent Stage I Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Comparison of Surgical and Oncological Outcomes
by: Yongxue Wang, et al.
Published: (2022-06-01) -
Minimally Invasive Surgery for Pediatric Adrenal Masses—Report on Four Cases
by: Ahmed ElHaddad, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Editorial: Minimally invasive surgery in gynecology oncology: current trends and controversies
by: Andrea Giannini, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Comparison of the Oncological Outcomes of Open versus Laparoscopic Surgery for T2 Gallbladder Cancer: A Propensity-Score-Matched Analysis
by: Jin-Kyu Cho, et al.
Published: (2022-05-01) -
New Insights on the Minimal-Invasive Therapy of Cervical Cancer
by: Khayal Gasimli, et al.
Published: (2022-08-01)