“White Diversity”: Paradoxes of Deracializing Antidiscrimination

This article questions, at its starting point, the theoretical and epistemic assumptions around the emergence of the concept of (super)diversity, hailed in a growing body of academic literature as marking a “diversity turn”. In the second part, it highlights the issues raised by the organizational a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Milena Doytcheva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-04-01
Series:Social Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/4/50
_version_ 1797570743363436544
author Milena Doytcheva
author_facet Milena Doytcheva
author_sort Milena Doytcheva
collection DOAJ
description This article questions, at its starting point, the theoretical and epistemic assumptions around the emergence of the concept of (super)diversity, hailed in a growing body of academic literature as marking a “diversity turn”. In the second part, it highlights the issues raised by the organizational applications of the diversity paradigm in three main policy domains: migration, urban planning, and antidiscrimination. Finally, emphasizing the development of white-centered diversity conceptions, particularly in the European and French contexts, it invites a closer look at the intertwining of scholarly and practical elaborations of the diversity frame by considering knowledge as practice.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T20:29:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-22c09b8b1ab44b2687eb1226fa257d35
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-0760
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T20:29:43Z
publishDate 2020-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Social Sciences
spelling doaj.art-22c09b8b1ab44b2687eb1226fa257d352023-11-19T21:30:14ZengMDPI AGSocial Sciences2076-07602020-04-01945010.3390/socsci9040050“White Diversity”: Paradoxes of Deracializing AntidiscriminationMilena Doytcheva0Department of Philosophy, University of Lille, 59000 Lille, FranceThis article questions, at its starting point, the theoretical and epistemic assumptions around the emergence of the concept of (super)diversity, hailed in a growing body of academic literature as marking a “diversity turn”. In the second part, it highlights the issues raised by the organizational applications of the diversity paradigm in three main policy domains: migration, urban planning, and antidiscrimination. Finally, emphasizing the development of white-centered diversity conceptions, particularly in the European and French contexts, it invites a closer look at the intertwining of scholarly and practical elaborations of the diversity frame by considering knowledge as practice.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/4/50diversitysuperdiversitymulticulturecritical diversity studiesracismdiscrimination
spellingShingle Milena Doytcheva
“White Diversity”: Paradoxes of Deracializing Antidiscrimination
Social Sciences
diversity
superdiversity
multiculture
critical diversity studies
racism
discrimination
title “White Diversity”: Paradoxes of Deracializing Antidiscrimination
title_full “White Diversity”: Paradoxes of Deracializing Antidiscrimination
title_fullStr “White Diversity”: Paradoxes of Deracializing Antidiscrimination
title_full_unstemmed “White Diversity”: Paradoxes of Deracializing Antidiscrimination
title_short “White Diversity”: Paradoxes of Deracializing Antidiscrimination
title_sort white diversity paradoxes of deracializing antidiscrimination
topic diversity
superdiversity
multiculture
critical diversity studies
racism
discrimination
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/4/50
work_keys_str_mv AT milenadoytcheva whitediversityparadoxesofderacializingantidiscrimination