“White Diversity”: Paradoxes of Deracializing Antidiscrimination
This article questions, at its starting point, the theoretical and epistemic assumptions around the emergence of the concept of (super)diversity, hailed in a growing body of academic literature as marking a “diversity turn”. In the second part, it highlights the issues raised by the organizational a...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-04-01
|
Series: | Social Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/4/50 |
_version_ | 1797570743363436544 |
---|---|
author | Milena Doytcheva |
author_facet | Milena Doytcheva |
author_sort | Milena Doytcheva |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This article questions, at its starting point, the theoretical and epistemic assumptions around the emergence of the concept of (super)diversity, hailed in a growing body of academic literature as marking a “diversity turn”. In the second part, it highlights the issues raised by the organizational applications of the diversity paradigm in three main policy domains: migration, urban planning, and antidiscrimination. Finally, emphasizing the development of white-centered diversity conceptions, particularly in the European and French contexts, it invites a closer look at the intertwining of scholarly and practical elaborations of the diversity frame by considering knowledge as practice. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T20:29:43Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-22c09b8b1ab44b2687eb1226fa257d35 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2076-0760 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T20:29:43Z |
publishDate | 2020-04-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Social Sciences |
spelling | doaj.art-22c09b8b1ab44b2687eb1226fa257d352023-11-19T21:30:14ZengMDPI AGSocial Sciences2076-07602020-04-01945010.3390/socsci9040050“White Diversity”: Paradoxes of Deracializing AntidiscriminationMilena Doytcheva0Department of Philosophy, University of Lille, 59000 Lille, FranceThis article questions, at its starting point, the theoretical and epistemic assumptions around the emergence of the concept of (super)diversity, hailed in a growing body of academic literature as marking a “diversity turn”. In the second part, it highlights the issues raised by the organizational applications of the diversity paradigm in three main policy domains: migration, urban planning, and antidiscrimination. Finally, emphasizing the development of white-centered diversity conceptions, particularly in the European and French contexts, it invites a closer look at the intertwining of scholarly and practical elaborations of the diversity frame by considering knowledge as practice.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/4/50diversitysuperdiversitymulticulturecritical diversity studiesracismdiscrimination |
spellingShingle | Milena Doytcheva “White Diversity”: Paradoxes of Deracializing Antidiscrimination Social Sciences diversity superdiversity multiculture critical diversity studies racism discrimination |
title | “White Diversity”: Paradoxes of Deracializing Antidiscrimination |
title_full | “White Diversity”: Paradoxes of Deracializing Antidiscrimination |
title_fullStr | “White Diversity”: Paradoxes of Deracializing Antidiscrimination |
title_full_unstemmed | “White Diversity”: Paradoxes of Deracializing Antidiscrimination |
title_short | “White Diversity”: Paradoxes of Deracializing Antidiscrimination |
title_sort | white diversity paradoxes of deracializing antidiscrimination |
topic | diversity superdiversity multiculture critical diversity studies racism discrimination |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/4/50 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT milenadoytcheva whitediversityparadoxesofderacializingantidiscrimination |