A global perspective in second‐line treatment patterns for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract Background Esophageal cancer is a highly prevalent cancer associated with low survival, especially among those with advanced disease. Second‐line (2L) treatment patterns and related clinical outcomes of patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (advESCC) treated in routine c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dena H. Jaffe, Joseph Gricar, Marc DeCongelio, deMauri S. Mackie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-05-01
Series:Thoracic Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14334
_version_ 1811301167442952192
author Dena H. Jaffe
Joseph Gricar
Marc DeCongelio
deMauri S. Mackie
author_facet Dena H. Jaffe
Joseph Gricar
Marc DeCongelio
deMauri S. Mackie
author_sort Dena H. Jaffe
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Esophageal cancer is a highly prevalent cancer associated with low survival, especially among those with advanced disease. Second‐line (2L) treatment patterns and related clinical outcomes of patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (advESCC) treated in routine clinical care were examined globally and regionally. Methods A retrospective, noninterventional study collected physician‐provided chart data of patients aged ≥20 years receiving either 2L active systemic therapy or BSC following first‐line active therapy for advESCC from 11 countries in Asian and Western regions (September–October 2018). Bivariate analyses examined treatment and outcomes by region. Results AdvESCC patients (Asia = 192; West = 195) were examined, of which 58.1% (Asia n = 101; West n = 124) received active systemic therapy. While regional differences in tumor classification and staging at diagnosis were observed with less advanced tumors in Asia, no regional differences for these characteristics at 2L initiation were reported. Both taxane‐ and nontaxane‐based therapies were used as 2L therapy among Asian and Western patients, although more western than Asian patients received immuno‐ or targeted therapies (17.0% vs. 3.0%; p = 0.001). Alopecia (10.7%), neutropenia (9.3%), and fatigue (9.3%) were the most‐commonly reported adverse events (AEs) in both regions. Significantly higher 2L AE‐related emergency room visits (Asia = 22.5% vs. West = 8.0%; p < 0.001) and hospitalizations (Asia = 25.9 ± 31.2 vs. West = 4.7 ± 7.0, p < 0.001) were observed in Asian than in Western patients. No regional differences were reported for response to 2L treatment or the percent of patients who received third‐line treatment/died. Conclusions While regional variations were observed throughout the course of a patient's advESCC journey, disease response and treatment outcomes were similar.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T07:04:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-22e267d7dbc348b8959218323a02159f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1759-7706
1759-7714
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T07:04:05Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Thoracic Cancer
spelling doaj.art-22e267d7dbc348b8959218323a02159f2022-12-22T02:57:02ZengWileyThoracic Cancer1759-77061759-77142022-05-011391240125710.1111/1759-7714.14334A global perspective in second‐line treatment patterns for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinomaDena H. Jaffe0Joseph Gricar1Marc DeCongelio2deMauri S. Mackie3RWE Cerner Enviza Jerusalem IsraelWWHEOR Bristol‐Myers Squibb Princeton New Jersey USAResearch and Consulting Cerner Enviza New York New York USARWE Cerner Enviza New York New York USAAbstract Background Esophageal cancer is a highly prevalent cancer associated with low survival, especially among those with advanced disease. Second‐line (2L) treatment patterns and related clinical outcomes of patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (advESCC) treated in routine clinical care were examined globally and regionally. Methods A retrospective, noninterventional study collected physician‐provided chart data of patients aged ≥20 years receiving either 2L active systemic therapy or BSC following first‐line active therapy for advESCC from 11 countries in Asian and Western regions (September–October 2018). Bivariate analyses examined treatment and outcomes by region. Results AdvESCC patients (Asia = 192; West = 195) were examined, of which 58.1% (Asia n = 101; West n = 124) received active systemic therapy. While regional differences in tumor classification and staging at diagnosis were observed with less advanced tumors in Asia, no regional differences for these characteristics at 2L initiation were reported. Both taxane‐ and nontaxane‐based therapies were used as 2L therapy among Asian and Western patients, although more western than Asian patients received immuno‐ or targeted therapies (17.0% vs. 3.0%; p = 0.001). Alopecia (10.7%), neutropenia (9.3%), and fatigue (9.3%) were the most‐commonly reported adverse events (AEs) in both regions. Significantly higher 2L AE‐related emergency room visits (Asia = 22.5% vs. West = 8.0%; p < 0.001) and hospitalizations (Asia = 25.9 ± 31.2 vs. West = 4.7 ± 7.0, p < 0.001) were observed in Asian than in Western patients. No regional differences were reported for response to 2L treatment or the percent of patients who received third‐line treatment/died. Conclusions While regional variations were observed throughout the course of a patient's advESCC journey, disease response and treatment outcomes were similar.https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14334advanced ESCCEsophageal cancerhealthcare resource utilizationsecond‐linetreatment patterns
spellingShingle Dena H. Jaffe
Joseph Gricar
Marc DeCongelio
deMauri S. Mackie
A global perspective in second‐line treatment patterns for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Thoracic Cancer
advanced ESCC
Esophageal cancer
healthcare resource utilization
second‐line
treatment patterns
title A global perspective in second‐line treatment patterns for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
title_full A global perspective in second‐line treatment patterns for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
title_fullStr A global perspective in second‐line treatment patterns for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed A global perspective in second‐line treatment patterns for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
title_short A global perspective in second‐line treatment patterns for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
title_sort global perspective in second line treatment patterns for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
topic advanced ESCC
Esophageal cancer
healthcare resource utilization
second‐line
treatment patterns
url https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14334
work_keys_str_mv AT denahjaffe aglobalperspectiveinsecondlinetreatmentpatternsforpatientswithadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT josephgricar aglobalperspectiveinsecondlinetreatmentpatternsforpatientswithadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT marcdecongelio aglobalperspectiveinsecondlinetreatmentpatternsforpatientswithadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT demaurismackie aglobalperspectiveinsecondlinetreatmentpatternsforpatientswithadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT denahjaffe globalperspectiveinsecondlinetreatmentpatternsforpatientswithadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT josephgricar globalperspectiveinsecondlinetreatmentpatternsforpatientswithadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT marcdecongelio globalperspectiveinsecondlinetreatmentpatternsforpatientswithadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT demaurismackie globalperspectiveinsecondlinetreatmentpatternsforpatientswithadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma