Face-to-face and telerehabilitation delivery of circuit training have similar benefits and acceptability in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomised trial

Question: Is periodised circuit training delivered via a telerehabilitation model of care as effective as the same training applied face-to-face for improving pain intensity, physical function, muscle strength, pain catastrophising, body composition, intermuscular adipose tissue and muscle architect...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jéssica Bianca Aily, Marcos de Noronha, Luiz Fernando Approbato Selistre, Ricardo José Ferrari, Daniel Kent White, Stela Marcia Mattiello
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-10-01
Series:Journal of Physiotherapy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955323000917
_version_ 1797666826731126784
author Jéssica Bianca Aily
Marcos de Noronha
Luiz Fernando Approbato Selistre
Ricardo José Ferrari
Daniel Kent White
Stela Marcia Mattiello
author_facet Jéssica Bianca Aily
Marcos de Noronha
Luiz Fernando Approbato Selistre
Ricardo José Ferrari
Daniel Kent White
Stela Marcia Mattiello
author_sort Jéssica Bianca Aily
collection DOAJ
description Question: Is periodised circuit training delivered via a telerehabilitation model of care as effective as the same training applied face-to-face for improving pain intensity, physical function, muscle strength, pain catastrophising, body composition, intermuscular adipose tissue and muscle architecture in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA)? Design: Randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessors and intention-to-treat analysis. Participants: One hundred adults aged ≥ 40 years with knee OA and pain for ≥ 3 months, with current pain ≥ 40 mm on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Intervention: The experimental group received 14 weeks of circuit training delivered via telerehabilitation using video recordings, followed by periodic phone calls in order to motivate and instruct participants. The control group received the same circuit training program in a face-to-face format. Outcome measures: The primary outcomes were pain VAS and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) physical function subscale, measured at 14 weeks. Secondary outcomes included objective physical function, strength, pain catastrophising and morphological measures (muscle architecture and thigh and body composition). Outcomes were measured at 14 and 26 weeks. Results: Periodised circuit training delivered via telerehabilitation had equivalent effects to face-to-face delivery for pain intensity, physical function, muscle strength, pain catastrophising, thigh composition, intermuscular adipose tissue and muscle architecture. Whole body composition did not change appreciably in either group. Adherence to the training was excellent and participants in each group reported good perceptions of their randomised intervention. Conclusion: A periodised circuit training protocol can be delivered to people with knee OA in their own homes, using available technology while maintaining high levels of acceptability. More importantly, telerehabilitation appears to cause non-inferior physical and functional outcomes to face-to-face rehabilitation programs. Trial registration: RBR-662hn2.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T20:05:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-230130dc3d014b91b85d186e02b358f8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1836-9553
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T20:05:08Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Physiotherapy
spelling doaj.art-230130dc3d014b91b85d186e02b358f82023-10-04T04:14:11ZengElsevierJournal of Physiotherapy1836-95532023-10-01694232239Face-to-face and telerehabilitation delivery of circuit training have similar benefits and acceptability in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomised trialJéssica Bianca Aily0Marcos de Noronha1Luiz Fernando Approbato Selistre2Ricardo José Ferrari3Daniel Kent White4Stela Marcia Mattiello5Physiotherapy Department, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, BrazilPhysiotherapy Department, La Trobe University, Bendigo, AustraliaPhysiotherapy Department, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, BrazilComputing Department, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, BrazilDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, USAPhysiotherapy Department, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil; Correspondence: Stela Marcia Mattiello, Physiotherapy Department, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil.Question: Is periodised circuit training delivered via a telerehabilitation model of care as effective as the same training applied face-to-face for improving pain intensity, physical function, muscle strength, pain catastrophising, body composition, intermuscular adipose tissue and muscle architecture in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA)? Design: Randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessors and intention-to-treat analysis. Participants: One hundred adults aged ≥ 40 years with knee OA and pain for ≥ 3 months, with current pain ≥ 40 mm on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Intervention: The experimental group received 14 weeks of circuit training delivered via telerehabilitation using video recordings, followed by periodic phone calls in order to motivate and instruct participants. The control group received the same circuit training program in a face-to-face format. Outcome measures: The primary outcomes were pain VAS and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) physical function subscale, measured at 14 weeks. Secondary outcomes included objective physical function, strength, pain catastrophising and morphological measures (muscle architecture and thigh and body composition). Outcomes were measured at 14 and 26 weeks. Results: Periodised circuit training delivered via telerehabilitation had equivalent effects to face-to-face delivery for pain intensity, physical function, muscle strength, pain catastrophising, thigh composition, intermuscular adipose tissue and muscle architecture. Whole body composition did not change appreciably in either group. Adherence to the training was excellent and participants in each group reported good perceptions of their randomised intervention. Conclusion: A periodised circuit training protocol can be delivered to people with knee OA in their own homes, using available technology while maintaining high levels of acceptability. More importantly, telerehabilitation appears to cause non-inferior physical and functional outcomes to face-to-face rehabilitation programs. Trial registration: RBR-662hn2.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955323000917Knee osteoarthritisCircuit trainingRandomised controlled trialTelemedicinePhysical therapy
spellingShingle Jéssica Bianca Aily
Marcos de Noronha
Luiz Fernando Approbato Selistre
Ricardo José Ferrari
Daniel Kent White
Stela Marcia Mattiello
Face-to-face and telerehabilitation delivery of circuit training have similar benefits and acceptability in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomised trial
Journal of Physiotherapy
Knee osteoarthritis
Circuit training
Randomised controlled trial
Telemedicine
Physical therapy
title Face-to-face and telerehabilitation delivery of circuit training have similar benefits and acceptability in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomised trial
title_full Face-to-face and telerehabilitation delivery of circuit training have similar benefits and acceptability in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomised trial
title_fullStr Face-to-face and telerehabilitation delivery of circuit training have similar benefits and acceptability in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed Face-to-face and telerehabilitation delivery of circuit training have similar benefits and acceptability in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomised trial
title_short Face-to-face and telerehabilitation delivery of circuit training have similar benefits and acceptability in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomised trial
title_sort face to face and telerehabilitation delivery of circuit training have similar benefits and acceptability in patients with knee osteoarthritis a randomised trial
topic Knee osteoarthritis
Circuit training
Randomised controlled trial
Telemedicine
Physical therapy
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955323000917
work_keys_str_mv AT jessicabiancaaily facetofaceandtelerehabilitationdeliveryofcircuittraininghavesimilarbenefitsandacceptabilityinpatientswithkneeosteoarthritisarandomisedtrial
AT marcosdenoronha facetofaceandtelerehabilitationdeliveryofcircuittraininghavesimilarbenefitsandacceptabilityinpatientswithkneeosteoarthritisarandomisedtrial
AT luizfernandoapprobatoselistre facetofaceandtelerehabilitationdeliveryofcircuittraininghavesimilarbenefitsandacceptabilityinpatientswithkneeosteoarthritisarandomisedtrial
AT ricardojoseferrari facetofaceandtelerehabilitationdeliveryofcircuittraininghavesimilarbenefitsandacceptabilityinpatientswithkneeosteoarthritisarandomisedtrial
AT danielkentwhite facetofaceandtelerehabilitationdeliveryofcircuittraininghavesimilarbenefitsandacceptabilityinpatientswithkneeosteoarthritisarandomisedtrial
AT stelamarciamattiello facetofaceandtelerehabilitationdeliveryofcircuittraininghavesimilarbenefitsandacceptabilityinpatientswithkneeosteoarthritisarandomisedtrial