Detecting Presymptomatic Infection Is Necessary to Forecast Major Epidemics in the Earliest Stages of Infectious Disease Outbreaks.

We assess how presymptomatic infection affects predictability of infectious disease epidemics. We focus on whether or not a major outbreak (i.e. an epidemic that will go on to infect a large number of individuals) can be predicted reliably soon after initial cases of disease have appeared within a p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robin N Thompson, Christopher A Gilligan, Nik J Cunniffe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-04-01
Series:PLoS Computational Biology
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4821482?pdf=render
_version_ 1818338643998146560
author Robin N Thompson
Christopher A Gilligan
Nik J Cunniffe
author_facet Robin N Thompson
Christopher A Gilligan
Nik J Cunniffe
author_sort Robin N Thompson
collection DOAJ
description We assess how presymptomatic infection affects predictability of infectious disease epidemics. We focus on whether or not a major outbreak (i.e. an epidemic that will go on to infect a large number of individuals) can be predicted reliably soon after initial cases of disease have appeared within a population. For emerging epidemics, significant time and effort is spent recording symptomatic cases. Scientific attention has often focused on improving statistical methodologies to estimate disease transmission parameters from these data. Here we show that, even if symptomatic cases are recorded perfectly, and disease spread parameters are estimated exactly, it is impossible to estimate the probability of a major outbreak without ambiguity. Our results therefore provide an upper bound on the accuracy of forecasts of major outbreaks that are constructed using data on symptomatic cases alone. Accurate prediction of whether or not an epidemic will occur requires records of symptomatic individuals to be supplemented with data concerning the true infection status of apparently uninfected individuals. To forecast likely future behavior in the earliest stages of an emerging outbreak, it is therefore vital to develop and deploy accurate diagnostic tests that can determine whether asymptomatic individuals are actually uninfected, or instead are infected but just do not yet show detectable symptoms.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T15:14:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-23030b5574894c91ac0ea70b63c4b2c7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1553-734X
1553-7358
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T15:14:23Z
publishDate 2016-04-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS Computational Biology
spelling doaj.art-23030b5574894c91ac0ea70b63c4b2c72022-12-21T23:40:45ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582016-04-01124e100483610.1371/journal.pcbi.1004836Detecting Presymptomatic Infection Is Necessary to Forecast Major Epidemics in the Earliest Stages of Infectious Disease Outbreaks.Robin N ThompsonChristopher A GilliganNik J CunniffeWe assess how presymptomatic infection affects predictability of infectious disease epidemics. We focus on whether or not a major outbreak (i.e. an epidemic that will go on to infect a large number of individuals) can be predicted reliably soon after initial cases of disease have appeared within a population. For emerging epidemics, significant time and effort is spent recording symptomatic cases. Scientific attention has often focused on improving statistical methodologies to estimate disease transmission parameters from these data. Here we show that, even if symptomatic cases are recorded perfectly, and disease spread parameters are estimated exactly, it is impossible to estimate the probability of a major outbreak without ambiguity. Our results therefore provide an upper bound on the accuracy of forecasts of major outbreaks that are constructed using data on symptomatic cases alone. Accurate prediction of whether or not an epidemic will occur requires records of symptomatic individuals to be supplemented with data concerning the true infection status of apparently uninfected individuals. To forecast likely future behavior in the earliest stages of an emerging outbreak, it is therefore vital to develop and deploy accurate diagnostic tests that can determine whether asymptomatic individuals are actually uninfected, or instead are infected but just do not yet show detectable symptoms.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4821482?pdf=render
spellingShingle Robin N Thompson
Christopher A Gilligan
Nik J Cunniffe
Detecting Presymptomatic Infection Is Necessary to Forecast Major Epidemics in the Earliest Stages of Infectious Disease Outbreaks.
PLoS Computational Biology
title Detecting Presymptomatic Infection Is Necessary to Forecast Major Epidemics in the Earliest Stages of Infectious Disease Outbreaks.
title_full Detecting Presymptomatic Infection Is Necessary to Forecast Major Epidemics in the Earliest Stages of Infectious Disease Outbreaks.
title_fullStr Detecting Presymptomatic Infection Is Necessary to Forecast Major Epidemics in the Earliest Stages of Infectious Disease Outbreaks.
title_full_unstemmed Detecting Presymptomatic Infection Is Necessary to Forecast Major Epidemics in the Earliest Stages of Infectious Disease Outbreaks.
title_short Detecting Presymptomatic Infection Is Necessary to Forecast Major Epidemics in the Earliest Stages of Infectious Disease Outbreaks.
title_sort detecting presymptomatic infection is necessary to forecast major epidemics in the earliest stages of infectious disease outbreaks
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4821482?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT robinnthompson detectingpresymptomaticinfectionisnecessarytoforecastmajorepidemicsintheearlieststagesofinfectiousdiseaseoutbreaks
AT christopheragilligan detectingpresymptomaticinfectionisnecessarytoforecastmajorepidemicsintheearlieststagesofinfectiousdiseaseoutbreaks
AT nikjcunniffe detectingpresymptomaticinfectionisnecessarytoforecastmajorepidemicsintheearlieststagesofinfectiousdiseaseoutbreaks