Rupture risk assessment for multiple intracranial aneurysms: why there is no need for dozens of clinical, morphological and hemodynamic parameters
Introduction: A multitude of approaches have been postulated for assessing the risk of intracranial aneurysm rupture. However, the amount of potential predictive factors is not applicable in clinical practice and they are rejected in favor of the more practical PHASES score. For the subgroup of mult...
Main Authors: | Belal Neyazi, Vanessa M. Swiatek, Martin Skalej, Oliver Beuing, Klaus-Peter Stein, Jörg Hattingen, Bernhard Preim, Philipp Berg, Sylvia Saalfeld, I. Erol Sandalcioglu |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/1756286420966159 |
Similar Items
-
Immersive VR training system for clipping intracranial aneurysms
by: Allgaier Mareen, et al.
Published: (2022-07-01) -
An interactive tool for identifying patient subgroups based on arbitrary characteristics for medical research
by: Spitz Lena, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01) -
Geometric uncertainty in intracranial aneurysm rupture status discrimination: a two-site retrospective study
by: Oliver Beuing, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01) -
Wall enhancement segmentation for intracranial aneurysm
by: Niemann Annika, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01) -
Can Endovascular Treatment of Fusiform Intracranial Aneurysms Restore the Healthy Hemodynamic Environment?–A Virtual Pilot Study
by: Sylvia Saalfeld, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)