“Why Can’t We?” Disinformation and Right to Self-Determination. The Catalan Conflict on Twitter
Disinformation does not always take the form of a fake news item, it also appears in much less evident formats which are subtly filtered into public opinion, thus making its detection more difficult. A method is proposed in this paper to address the study of “widespread” disinformation by combining...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-10-01
|
| Series: | Social Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/10/383 |
| _version_ | 1797513114870087680 |
|---|---|
| author | Elena Llorca-Asensi Alexander Sánchez Díaz Maria-Elena Fabregat-Cabrera Raúl Ruiz-Callado |
| author_facet | Elena Llorca-Asensi Alexander Sánchez Díaz Maria-Elena Fabregat-Cabrera Raúl Ruiz-Callado |
| author_sort | Elena Llorca-Asensi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Disinformation does not always take the form of a fake news item, it also appears in much less evident formats which are subtly filtered into public opinion, thus making its detection more difficult. A method is proposed in this paper to address the study of “widespread” disinformation by combining social science methods with artificial intelligence and text mining. The case study chosen was the expression “right of self-determination” as a generator of disinformation within the context of the Catalan independence process. The main work hypothesis was that the (intentional or unintentional) confusion around the meaning and scope of this right has become widely extended within the population, generating negative emotions which favour social polarisation. The method utilised had three stages: (1) Description of the disinformation elements surrounding the term with the help of experts; (2) Detection of these elements within a corpus of tweets; (3) Identification of the emotions expressed in the corpus. The results show that the disinformation described by experts clearly dominates the conversation about “self-determination” on Twitter and is associated with a highly negative emotional load in which contempt, hatred, and frustration prevail. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T06:12:05Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-2305b1dc6f9d4974b44a0c904c4c5290 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2076-0760 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T06:12:05Z |
| publishDate | 2021-10-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Social Sciences |
| spelling | doaj.art-2305b1dc6f9d4974b44a0c904c4c52902023-11-22T20:01:03ZengMDPI AGSocial Sciences2076-07602021-10-01101038310.3390/socsci10100383“Why Can’t We?” Disinformation and Right to Self-Determination. The Catalan Conflict on TwitterElena Llorca-Asensi0Alexander Sánchez Díaz1Maria-Elena Fabregat-Cabrera2Raúl Ruiz-Callado3Department of Sociology 1, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, SpainDepartment of Computing Languages and Systems, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, SpainDepartment of Sociology 1, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, SpainDepartment of Sociology 1, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, SpainDisinformation does not always take the form of a fake news item, it also appears in much less evident formats which are subtly filtered into public opinion, thus making its detection more difficult. A method is proposed in this paper to address the study of “widespread” disinformation by combining social science methods with artificial intelligence and text mining. The case study chosen was the expression “right of self-determination” as a generator of disinformation within the context of the Catalan independence process. The main work hypothesis was that the (intentional or unintentional) confusion around the meaning and scope of this right has become widely extended within the population, generating negative emotions which favour social polarisation. The method utilised had three stages: (1) Description of the disinformation elements surrounding the term with the help of experts; (2) Detection of these elements within a corpus of tweets; (3) Identification of the emotions expressed in the corpus. The results show that the disinformation described by experts clearly dominates the conversation about “self-determination” on Twitter and is associated with a highly negative emotional load in which contempt, hatred, and frustration prevail.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/10/383disinformationmisinformationself-determinationrightslawpolarization |
| spellingShingle | Elena Llorca-Asensi Alexander Sánchez Díaz Maria-Elena Fabregat-Cabrera Raúl Ruiz-Callado “Why Can’t We?” Disinformation and Right to Self-Determination. The Catalan Conflict on Twitter Social Sciences disinformation misinformation self-determination rights law polarization |
| title | “Why Can’t We?” Disinformation and Right to Self-Determination. The Catalan Conflict on Twitter |
| title_full | “Why Can’t We?” Disinformation and Right to Self-Determination. The Catalan Conflict on Twitter |
| title_fullStr | “Why Can’t We?” Disinformation and Right to Self-Determination. The Catalan Conflict on Twitter |
| title_full_unstemmed | “Why Can’t We?” Disinformation and Right to Self-Determination. The Catalan Conflict on Twitter |
| title_short | “Why Can’t We?” Disinformation and Right to Self-Determination. The Catalan Conflict on Twitter |
| title_sort | why can t we disinformation and right to self determination the catalan conflict on twitter |
| topic | disinformation misinformation self-determination rights law polarization |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/10/383 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT elenallorcaasensi whycantwedisinformationandrighttoselfdeterminationthecatalanconflictontwitter AT alexandersanchezdiaz whycantwedisinformationandrighttoselfdeterminationthecatalanconflictontwitter AT mariaelenafabregatcabrera whycantwedisinformationandrighttoselfdeterminationthecatalanconflictontwitter AT raulruizcallado whycantwedisinformationandrighttoselfdeterminationthecatalanconflictontwitter |