Uncertainty in future agro-climate projections in the United States and benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation
Scientific challenges exist on how to extract information from the wide range of projected impacts simulated by crop models driven by climate ensembles. A stronger focus is required to understand and identify the mechanisms and drivers of projected changes in crop yield. In this study, we investigat...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IOP Publishing
2016-01-01
|
| Series: | Environmental Research Letters |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/5/055001 |
| _version_ | 1797748610256863232 |
|---|---|
| author | Erwan Monier Liyi Xu Richard Snyder |
| author_facet | Erwan Monier Liyi Xu Richard Snyder |
| author_sort | Erwan Monier |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Scientific challenges exist on how to extract information from the wide range of projected impacts simulated by crop models driven by climate ensembles. A stronger focus is required to understand and identify the mechanisms and drivers of projected changes in crop yield. In this study, we investigate the robustness of future projections of five metrics relevant to agriculture stakeholders (accumulated frost days, dry days, growing season length, plant heat stress and start of field operations). We use a large ensemble of climate simulations by the MIT IGSM-CAM integrated assessment model that accounts for the uncertainty associated with different emissions scenarios, climate sensitivities, and representations of natural variability. By the end of the century, the US is projected to experience fewer frosts, a longer growing season, more heat stress and an earlier start of field operations—although the magnitude and even the sign of these changes vary greatly by regions. Projected changes in dry days are shown not to be robust. We highlight the important role of natural variability, in particular for changes in dry days (a precipitation-related index) and heat stress (a threshold index). The wide range of our projections compares well the CMIP5 multi-model ensemble, especially for temperature-related indices. This suggests that using a single climate model that accounts for key sources of uncertainty can provide an efficient and complementary framework to the more common approach of multi-model ensembles. We also show that greenhouse gas mitigation has the potential to significantly reduce adverse effects (heat stress, risks of pest and disease) of climate change on agriculture, while also curtailing potentially beneficial impacts (earlier planting, possibility for multiple cropping). A major benefit of climate mitigation is potentially preventing changes in several indices to emerge from the noise of natural variability, even by 2100. This has major implications considering that any significant climate change impacts on crop yield would result in nation-wide changes in the agriculture sector. Finally, we argue that the analysis of agro-climate indices should more often complement crop model projections, as they can provide valuable information to better understand the drivers of changes in crop yield and production and thus better inform adaptation decisions. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T16:08:14Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-230fc822f813420290e3845800c640a2 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1748-9326 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T16:08:14Z |
| publishDate | 2016-01-01 |
| publisher | IOP Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Environmental Research Letters |
| spelling | doaj.art-230fc822f813420290e3845800c640a22023-08-09T14:15:52ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262016-01-0111505500110.1088/1748-9326/11/5/055001Uncertainty in future agro-climate projections in the United States and benefits of greenhouse gas mitigationErwan Monier0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5533-6570Liyi Xu1Richard Snyder2Joint Program of the Science and Policy of Global Change, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge, Massachusetts, USAJoint Program of the Science and Policy of Global Change, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge, Massachusetts, USADepartment of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California , Davis, California, USAScientific challenges exist on how to extract information from the wide range of projected impacts simulated by crop models driven by climate ensembles. A stronger focus is required to understand and identify the mechanisms and drivers of projected changes in crop yield. In this study, we investigate the robustness of future projections of five metrics relevant to agriculture stakeholders (accumulated frost days, dry days, growing season length, plant heat stress and start of field operations). We use a large ensemble of climate simulations by the MIT IGSM-CAM integrated assessment model that accounts for the uncertainty associated with different emissions scenarios, climate sensitivities, and representations of natural variability. By the end of the century, the US is projected to experience fewer frosts, a longer growing season, more heat stress and an earlier start of field operations—although the magnitude and even the sign of these changes vary greatly by regions. Projected changes in dry days are shown not to be robust. We highlight the important role of natural variability, in particular for changes in dry days (a precipitation-related index) and heat stress (a threshold index). The wide range of our projections compares well the CMIP5 multi-model ensemble, especially for temperature-related indices. This suggests that using a single climate model that accounts for key sources of uncertainty can provide an efficient and complementary framework to the more common approach of multi-model ensembles. We also show that greenhouse gas mitigation has the potential to significantly reduce adverse effects (heat stress, risks of pest and disease) of climate change on agriculture, while also curtailing potentially beneficial impacts (earlier planting, possibility for multiple cropping). A major benefit of climate mitigation is potentially preventing changes in several indices to emerge from the noise of natural variability, even by 2100. This has major implications considering that any significant climate change impacts on crop yield would result in nation-wide changes in the agriculture sector. Finally, we argue that the analysis of agro-climate indices should more often complement crop model projections, as they can provide valuable information to better understand the drivers of changes in crop yield and production and thus better inform adaptation decisions.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/5/055001climate changeagricultureuncertaintynatural variabilitycrop modelingbenefits of mitigation |
| spellingShingle | Erwan Monier Liyi Xu Richard Snyder Uncertainty in future agro-climate projections in the United States and benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation Environmental Research Letters climate change agriculture uncertainty natural variability crop modeling benefits of mitigation |
| title | Uncertainty in future agro-climate projections in the United States and benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation |
| title_full | Uncertainty in future agro-climate projections in the United States and benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation |
| title_fullStr | Uncertainty in future agro-climate projections in the United States and benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Uncertainty in future agro-climate projections in the United States and benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation |
| title_short | Uncertainty in future agro-climate projections in the United States and benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation |
| title_sort | uncertainty in future agro climate projections in the united states and benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation |
| topic | climate change agriculture uncertainty natural variability crop modeling benefits of mitigation |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/5/055001 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT erwanmonier uncertaintyinfutureagroclimateprojectionsintheunitedstatesandbenefitsofgreenhousegasmitigation AT liyixu uncertaintyinfutureagroclimateprojectionsintheunitedstatesandbenefitsofgreenhousegasmitigation AT richardsnyder uncertaintyinfutureagroclimateprojectionsintheunitedstatesandbenefitsofgreenhousegasmitigation |