Tissue Discrimination by Uncorrected Autofluorescence Spectra: A Proof-of-Principle Study for Tissue-Specific Laser Surgery

Laser surgery provides a number of advantages over conventional surgery. However, it implies large risks for sensitive tissue structures due to its characteristic non-tissue-specific ablation. The present study investigates the discrimination of nine different ex vivo tissue types by using uncorrect...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katja Tangermann-Gerk, Michael Schmidt, Nicolai Oetter, Emeka Nkenke, Maximilian Rohde, Christian Knipfer, Werner Adler, Florian Stelzle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2013-10-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/13/10/13717
_version_ 1811305378440282112
author Katja Tangermann-Gerk
Michael Schmidt
Nicolai Oetter
Emeka Nkenke
Maximilian Rohde
Christian Knipfer
Werner Adler
Florian Stelzle
author_facet Katja Tangermann-Gerk
Michael Schmidt
Nicolai Oetter
Emeka Nkenke
Maximilian Rohde
Christian Knipfer
Werner Adler
Florian Stelzle
author_sort Katja Tangermann-Gerk
collection DOAJ
description Laser surgery provides a number of advantages over conventional surgery. However, it implies large risks for sensitive tissue structures due to its characteristic non-tissue-specific ablation. The present study investigates the discrimination of nine different ex vivo tissue types by using uncorrected (raw) autofluorescence spectra for the development of a remote feedback control system for tissue-selective laser surgery. Autofluorescence spectra (excitation wavelength 377 ± 50 nm) were measured from nine different ex vivo tissue types, obtained from 15 domestic pig cadavers. For data analysis, a wavelength range between 450 nm and 650 nm was investigated. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA) were used to discriminate the tissue types. ROC analysis showed that PCA, followed by QDA, could differentiate all investigated tissue types with AUC results between 1.00 and 0.97. Sensitivity reached values between 93% and 100% and specificity values between 94% and 100%. This ex vivo study shows a high differentiation potential for physiological tissue types when performing autofluorescence spectroscopy followed by PCA and QDA. The uncorrected autofluorescence spectra are suitable for reliable tissue discrimination and have a high potential to meet the challenges necessary for an optical feedback system for tissue-specific laser surgery.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T08:24:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2310dcde631d4adb8c6df4f740182cb6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T08:24:18Z
publishDate 2013-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-2310dcde631d4adb8c6df4f740182cb62022-12-22T02:54:31ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202013-10-011310137171373110.3390/s131013717Tissue Discrimination by Uncorrected Autofluorescence Spectra: A Proof-of-Principle Study for Tissue-Specific Laser SurgeryKatja Tangermann-GerkMichael SchmidtNicolai OetterEmeka NkenkeMaximilian RohdeChristian KnipferWerner AdlerFlorian StelzleLaser surgery provides a number of advantages over conventional surgery. However, it implies large risks for sensitive tissue structures due to its characteristic non-tissue-specific ablation. The present study investigates the discrimination of nine different ex vivo tissue types by using uncorrected (raw) autofluorescence spectra for the development of a remote feedback control system for tissue-selective laser surgery. Autofluorescence spectra (excitation wavelength 377 ± 50 nm) were measured from nine different ex vivo tissue types, obtained from 15 domestic pig cadavers. For data analysis, a wavelength range between 450 nm and 650 nm was investigated. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA) were used to discriminate the tissue types. ROC analysis showed that PCA, followed by QDA, could differentiate all investigated tissue types with AUC results between 1.00 and 0.97. Sensitivity reached values between 93% and 100% and specificity values between 94% and 100%. This ex vivo study shows a high differentiation potential for physiological tissue types when performing autofluorescence spectroscopy followed by PCA and QDA. The uncorrected autofluorescence spectra are suitable for reliable tissue discrimination and have a high potential to meet the challenges necessary for an optical feedback system for tissue-specific laser surgery.http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/13/10/13717autofluorescencefluorescencelaser ablationlaser surgery guidanceremote optical measurementremote surgical methodsspectra analysis
spellingShingle Katja Tangermann-Gerk
Michael Schmidt
Nicolai Oetter
Emeka Nkenke
Maximilian Rohde
Christian Knipfer
Werner Adler
Florian Stelzle
Tissue Discrimination by Uncorrected Autofluorescence Spectra: A Proof-of-Principle Study for Tissue-Specific Laser Surgery
Sensors
autofluorescence
fluorescence
laser ablation
laser surgery guidance
remote optical measurement
remote surgical methods
spectra analysis
title Tissue Discrimination by Uncorrected Autofluorescence Spectra: A Proof-of-Principle Study for Tissue-Specific Laser Surgery
title_full Tissue Discrimination by Uncorrected Autofluorescence Spectra: A Proof-of-Principle Study for Tissue-Specific Laser Surgery
title_fullStr Tissue Discrimination by Uncorrected Autofluorescence Spectra: A Proof-of-Principle Study for Tissue-Specific Laser Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Tissue Discrimination by Uncorrected Autofluorescence Spectra: A Proof-of-Principle Study for Tissue-Specific Laser Surgery
title_short Tissue Discrimination by Uncorrected Autofluorescence Spectra: A Proof-of-Principle Study for Tissue-Specific Laser Surgery
title_sort tissue discrimination by uncorrected autofluorescence spectra a proof of principle study for tissue specific laser surgery
topic autofluorescence
fluorescence
laser ablation
laser surgery guidance
remote optical measurement
remote surgical methods
spectra analysis
url http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/13/10/13717
work_keys_str_mv AT katjatangermanngerk tissuediscriminationbyuncorrectedautofluorescencespectraaproofofprinciplestudyfortissuespecificlasersurgery
AT michaelschmidt tissuediscriminationbyuncorrectedautofluorescencespectraaproofofprinciplestudyfortissuespecificlasersurgery
AT nicolaioetter tissuediscriminationbyuncorrectedautofluorescencespectraaproofofprinciplestudyfortissuespecificlasersurgery
AT emekankenke tissuediscriminationbyuncorrectedautofluorescencespectraaproofofprinciplestudyfortissuespecificlasersurgery
AT maximilianrohde tissuediscriminationbyuncorrectedautofluorescencespectraaproofofprinciplestudyfortissuespecificlasersurgery
AT christianknipfer tissuediscriminationbyuncorrectedautofluorescencespectraaproofofprinciplestudyfortissuespecificlasersurgery
AT werneradler tissuediscriminationbyuncorrectedautofluorescencespectraaproofofprinciplestudyfortissuespecificlasersurgery
AT florianstelzle tissuediscriminationbyuncorrectedautofluorescencespectraaproofofprinciplestudyfortissuespecificlasersurgery