Evaluation of the Efficacy and Correlation between Blood Glucose Measured Using Glucometers and Enzymatic Laboratory Methods

Background and Objectives: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is the most common chronic metabolic disease, with many complications including renal failure, blindness and non-traumatic amputation, so it is important to monitor and regulate blood glucose. Considering how easy home blood glucose monitoring is, we...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R Rasouli, R Mahdavi, AR Ostad Rahimi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Qom University of Medical Sciences 2012-01-01
Series:Majallah-i Dānishgāh-i ̒Ulūm-i Pizishkī-i Qum
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.muq.ac.ir/article-1-495-en.html
_version_ 1818622475959795712
author R Rasouli
R Mahdavi
AR Ostad Rahimi
author_facet R Rasouli
R Mahdavi
AR Ostad Rahimi
author_sort R Rasouli
collection DOAJ
description Background and Objectives: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is the most common chronic metabolic disease, with many complications including renal failure, blindness and non-traumatic amputation, so it is important to monitor and regulate blood glucose. Considering how easy home blood glucose monitoring is, we decided to evaluate the performance of two available glucometers for detection of blood glucose compared with standard laboratory methods. Methods: In this analytical study, we compared the capillary blood glucose levels of 60 volunteers with mean age of 32.8±9.6 years in Tabriz Mehr Laboratory as determined by test strips (two different Glucometers) with venous blood glucose levels’ measurements by the enzymatic method (the standard laboratory kit). Data were analyzed using one way-ANOVA test, T-test, Pearson correlation and Bland and Altman plot. Results: The mean differences of No: 1 and No: 2 Glucometers with enzymatic laboratory method were 20.78±11.61 and 4.5±3.76mg/dl respectively. The one way ANOVA test indicated significant differences between three methods (p<0.05). Further Duncanchr('39')s test revealed significant differences between two devices (p=0.001) and device No.1 and laboratory method (p=0.001); however, the differences between device No.2 and laboratory method were not statistically significant (p=0.83). Conclusion: According to the results, calibrating the devices with laboratory instruments in order to make major clinical decisions is recommended.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T18:25:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-231ea3f98c3e4f73a62405ea6b15f1a3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1735-7799
2008-1375
language fas
last_indexed 2024-12-16T18:25:46Z
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Qom University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Majallah-i Dānishgāh-i ̒Ulūm-i Pizishkī-i Qum
spelling doaj.art-231ea3f98c3e4f73a62405ea6b15f1a32022-12-21T22:21:24ZfasQom University of Medical SciencesMajallah-i Dānishgāh-i ̒Ulūm-i Pizishkī-i Qum1735-77992008-13752012-01-01549095Evaluation of the Efficacy and Correlation between Blood Glucose Measured Using Glucometers and Enzymatic Laboratory MethodsR Rasouli0R Mahdavi1AR Ostad Rahimi2 Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Background and Objectives: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is the most common chronic metabolic disease, with many complications including renal failure, blindness and non-traumatic amputation, so it is important to monitor and regulate blood glucose. Considering how easy home blood glucose monitoring is, we decided to evaluate the performance of two available glucometers for detection of blood glucose compared with standard laboratory methods. Methods: In this analytical study, we compared the capillary blood glucose levels of 60 volunteers with mean age of 32.8±9.6 years in Tabriz Mehr Laboratory as determined by test strips (two different Glucometers) with venous blood glucose levels’ measurements by the enzymatic method (the standard laboratory kit). Data were analyzed using one way-ANOVA test, T-test, Pearson correlation and Bland and Altman plot. Results: The mean differences of No: 1 and No: 2 Glucometers with enzymatic laboratory method were 20.78±11.61 and 4.5±3.76mg/dl respectively. The one way ANOVA test indicated significant differences between three methods (p<0.05). Further Duncanchr('39')s test revealed significant differences between two devices (p=0.001) and device No.1 and laboratory method (p=0.001); however, the differences between device No.2 and laboratory method were not statistically significant (p=0.83). Conclusion: According to the results, calibrating the devices with laboratory instruments in order to make major clinical decisions is recommended.http://journal.muq.ac.ir/article-1-495-en.htmlblood glucoseglucometer devicesdiabetes mellitus
spellingShingle R Rasouli
R Mahdavi
AR Ostad Rahimi
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Correlation between Blood Glucose Measured Using Glucometers and Enzymatic Laboratory Methods
Majallah-i Dānishgāh-i ̒Ulūm-i Pizishkī-i Qum
blood glucose
glucometer devices
diabetes mellitus
title Evaluation of the Efficacy and Correlation between Blood Glucose Measured Using Glucometers and Enzymatic Laboratory Methods
title_full Evaluation of the Efficacy and Correlation between Blood Glucose Measured Using Glucometers and Enzymatic Laboratory Methods
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Efficacy and Correlation between Blood Glucose Measured Using Glucometers and Enzymatic Laboratory Methods
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Efficacy and Correlation between Blood Glucose Measured Using Glucometers and Enzymatic Laboratory Methods
title_short Evaluation of the Efficacy and Correlation between Blood Glucose Measured Using Glucometers and Enzymatic Laboratory Methods
title_sort evaluation of the efficacy and correlation between blood glucose measured using glucometers and enzymatic laboratory methods
topic blood glucose
glucometer devices
diabetes mellitus
url http://journal.muq.ac.ir/article-1-495-en.html
work_keys_str_mv AT rrasouli evaluationoftheefficacyandcorrelationbetweenbloodglucosemeasuredusingglucometersandenzymaticlaboratorymethods
AT rmahdavi evaluationoftheefficacyandcorrelationbetweenbloodglucosemeasuredusingglucometersandenzymaticlaboratorymethods
AT arostadrahimi evaluationoftheefficacyandcorrelationbetweenbloodglucosemeasuredusingglucometersandenzymaticlaboratorymethods