Comparison of Three Methods for Distinguishing Glacier Zones Using Satellite SAR Data

Changes in glacier zones (e.g., firn, superimposed ice, ice) are good indicators of glacier response to climate change. There are few studies of glacier zone detection by SAR that are focused on more than one ice body and validated by terrestrial data. This study is unique in terms of the dataset co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barbara Barzycka, Mariusz Grabiec, Jacek Jania, Małgorzata Błaszczyk, Finnur Pálsson, Michał Laska, Dariusz Ignatiuk, Guðfinna Aðalgeirsdóttir
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-01-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/3/690
_version_ 1797623308995264512
author Barbara Barzycka
Mariusz Grabiec
Jacek Jania
Małgorzata Błaszczyk
Finnur Pálsson
Michał Laska
Dariusz Ignatiuk
Guðfinna Aðalgeirsdóttir
author_facet Barbara Barzycka
Mariusz Grabiec
Jacek Jania
Małgorzata Błaszczyk
Finnur Pálsson
Michał Laska
Dariusz Ignatiuk
Guðfinna Aðalgeirsdóttir
author_sort Barbara Barzycka
collection DOAJ
description Changes in glacier zones (e.g., firn, superimposed ice, ice) are good indicators of glacier response to climate change. There are few studies of glacier zone detection by SAR that are focused on more than one ice body and validated by terrestrial data. This study is unique in terms of the dataset collected—four C- and L-band quad-pol satellite SAR images, Ground Penetrating Radar data, shallow glacier cores—and the number of land ice bodies analyzed, namely, three tidewater glaciers in Svalbard and one ice cap in Iceland. The main aim is to assess how well popular methods of SAR analysis perform in distinguishing glacier zones, regardless of factors such as the morphologic differences of the ice bodies, or differences in SAR data. We test and validate three methods of glacier zone detection: (1) Gaussian Mixture Model–Expectation Maximization (GMM-EM) clustering of dual-pol backscattering coefficient (sigma0); (2) GMM-EM of quad-pol Pauli decomposition; and (3) quad-pol H/α Wishart segmentation. The main findings are that the unsupervised classification of both sigma0 and Pauli decomposition are promising methods for distinguishing glacier zones. The former performs better at detecting the firn zone on SAR images, and the latter in the superimposed ice zone. Additionally, C-band SAR data perform better than L-band at detecting firn, but the latter can potentially separate crevasses via the classification of sigma0 or Pauli decomposition. H/α Wishart segmentation resulted in inconsistent results across the tested cases and did not detect crevasses on L-band SAR data.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T09:26:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-23281f057c6f40d3a933ba78b099a6c5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T09:26:51Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-23281f057c6f40d3a933ba78b099a6c52023-11-16T17:52:51ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922023-01-0115369010.3390/rs15030690Comparison of Three Methods for Distinguishing Glacier Zones Using Satellite SAR DataBarbara Barzycka0Mariusz Grabiec1Jacek Jania2Małgorzata Błaszczyk3Finnur Pálsson4Michał Laska5Dariusz Ignatiuk6Guðfinna Aðalgeirsdóttir7Institute of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Będzinska 60, 41-200 Sosnowiec, PolandInstitute of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Będzinska 60, 41-200 Sosnowiec, PolandInstitute of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Będzinska 60, 41-200 Sosnowiec, PolandInstitute of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Będzinska 60, 41-200 Sosnowiec, PolandInstitute of Earth Sciences, University of Iceland, Sturlugata 7, 101 Reykjavík, IcelandInstitute of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Będzinska 60, 41-200 Sosnowiec, PolandInstitute of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Będzinska 60, 41-200 Sosnowiec, PolandInstitute of Earth Sciences, University of Iceland, Sturlugata 7, 101 Reykjavík, IcelandChanges in glacier zones (e.g., firn, superimposed ice, ice) are good indicators of glacier response to climate change. There are few studies of glacier zone detection by SAR that are focused on more than one ice body and validated by terrestrial data. This study is unique in terms of the dataset collected—four C- and L-band quad-pol satellite SAR images, Ground Penetrating Radar data, shallow glacier cores—and the number of land ice bodies analyzed, namely, three tidewater glaciers in Svalbard and one ice cap in Iceland. The main aim is to assess how well popular methods of SAR analysis perform in distinguishing glacier zones, regardless of factors such as the morphologic differences of the ice bodies, or differences in SAR data. We test and validate three methods of glacier zone detection: (1) Gaussian Mixture Model–Expectation Maximization (GMM-EM) clustering of dual-pol backscattering coefficient (sigma0); (2) GMM-EM of quad-pol Pauli decomposition; and (3) quad-pol H/α Wishart segmentation. The main findings are that the unsupervised classification of both sigma0 and Pauli decomposition are promising methods for distinguishing glacier zones. The former performs better at detecting the firn zone on SAR images, and the latter in the superimposed ice zone. Additionally, C-band SAR data perform better than L-band at detecting firn, but the latter can potentially separate crevasses via the classification of sigma0 or Pauli decomposition. H/α Wishart segmentation resulted in inconsistent results across the tested cases and did not detect crevasses on L-band SAR data.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/3/690glacier faciespolarimetryPolSARsigma0PauliH/alpha Wishart
spellingShingle Barbara Barzycka
Mariusz Grabiec
Jacek Jania
Małgorzata Błaszczyk
Finnur Pálsson
Michał Laska
Dariusz Ignatiuk
Guðfinna Aðalgeirsdóttir
Comparison of Three Methods for Distinguishing Glacier Zones Using Satellite SAR Data
Remote Sensing
glacier facies
polarimetry
PolSAR
sigma0
Pauli
H/alpha Wishart
title Comparison of Three Methods for Distinguishing Glacier Zones Using Satellite SAR Data
title_full Comparison of Three Methods for Distinguishing Glacier Zones Using Satellite SAR Data
title_fullStr Comparison of Three Methods for Distinguishing Glacier Zones Using Satellite SAR Data
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Three Methods for Distinguishing Glacier Zones Using Satellite SAR Data
title_short Comparison of Three Methods for Distinguishing Glacier Zones Using Satellite SAR Data
title_sort comparison of three methods for distinguishing glacier zones using satellite sar data
topic glacier facies
polarimetry
PolSAR
sigma0
Pauli
H/alpha Wishart
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/3/690
work_keys_str_mv AT barbarabarzycka comparisonofthreemethodsfordistinguishingglacierzonesusingsatellitesardata
AT mariuszgrabiec comparisonofthreemethodsfordistinguishingglacierzonesusingsatellitesardata
AT jacekjania comparisonofthreemethodsfordistinguishingglacierzonesusingsatellitesardata
AT małgorzatabłaszczyk comparisonofthreemethodsfordistinguishingglacierzonesusingsatellitesardata
AT finnurpalsson comparisonofthreemethodsfordistinguishingglacierzonesusingsatellitesardata
AT michałlaska comparisonofthreemethodsfordistinguishingglacierzonesusingsatellitesardata
AT dariuszignatiuk comparisonofthreemethodsfordistinguishingglacierzonesusingsatellitesardata
AT guðfinnaaðalgeirsdottir comparisonofthreemethodsfordistinguishingglacierzonesusingsatellitesardata