How Do People Evaluate Themselves in Terms of Assertiveness and Ability After Having Failed or Succeeded: The (Economic) Consequences Matter!

Relying on the Big Two framework (Abele et al., 2016,2021) and the distinction of agency into the facets of assertiveness and ability, three experimental studies address the hypothesis that assertiveness and ability are influenced differentially by the consequences of success or failure. In Studies...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Delphine Miraucourt, Sylvain Caruana, Patrick Mollaret
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2022-10-01
Series:International Review of Social Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.rips-irsp.com/articles/692
_version_ 1811220841614016512
author Delphine Miraucourt
Sylvain Caruana
Patrick Mollaret
author_facet Delphine Miraucourt
Sylvain Caruana
Patrick Mollaret
author_sort Delphine Miraucourt
collection DOAJ
description Relying on the Big Two framework (Abele et al., 2016,2021) and the distinction of agency into the facets of assertiveness and ability, three experimental studies address the hypothesis that assertiveness and ability are influenced differentially by the consequences of success or failure. In Studies 1 and 2, participants had to imagine presenting a product developed by a hospital to an audience while either knowing or not knowing that selling the product could have strong positive consequences for the hospital’s budget. They further had to imagine that they had succeeded in positively presenting the product or that they had failed. Study 2 replicated the design with the participants enacting the task for real. Supporting our hypotheses, we consistently found that self-evaluation of assertiveness was higher with both success and knowledge about the economic consequences, whereas self-evaluation of ability was higher with success but without knowledge of economic consequences. These findings support the facet approach of the agency dimension and give hints on how the assertiveness versus ability facets of self-evaluation differ.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T07:48:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-233ca6a3ceea4b0ea69b19308ea7e8a2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2397-8570
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T07:48:44Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format Article
series International Review of Social Psychology
spelling doaj.art-233ca6a3ceea4b0ea69b19308ea7e8a22022-12-22T03:41:38ZengUbiquity PressInternational Review of Social Psychology2397-85702022-10-0135110.5334/irsp.692146How Do People Evaluate Themselves in Terms of Assertiveness and Ability After Having Failed or Succeeded: The (Economic) Consequences Matter!Delphine Miraucourt0Sylvain Caruana1Patrick Mollaret2Université de Reims Champagne-ArdenneUniversité de Reims Champagne-ArdenneUniversité Paris 8 Vincennes - Saint-DenisRelying on the Big Two framework (Abele et al., 2016,2021) and the distinction of agency into the facets of assertiveness and ability, three experimental studies address the hypothesis that assertiveness and ability are influenced differentially by the consequences of success or failure. In Studies 1 and 2, participants had to imagine presenting a product developed by a hospital to an audience while either knowing or not knowing that selling the product could have strong positive consequences for the hospital’s budget. They further had to imagine that they had succeeded in positively presenting the product or that they had failed. Study 2 replicated the design with the participants enacting the task for real. Supporting our hypotheses, we consistently found that self-evaluation of assertiveness was higher with both success and knowledge about the economic consequences, whereas self-evaluation of ability was higher with success but without knowledge of economic consequences. These findings support the facet approach of the agency dimension and give hints on how the assertiveness versus ability facets of self-evaluation differ.https://www.rips-irsp.com/articles/692agencyassertivenessabilityconsequences of success or failure
spellingShingle Delphine Miraucourt
Sylvain Caruana
Patrick Mollaret
How Do People Evaluate Themselves in Terms of Assertiveness and Ability After Having Failed or Succeeded: The (Economic) Consequences Matter!
International Review of Social Psychology
agency
assertiveness
ability
consequences of success or failure
title How Do People Evaluate Themselves in Terms of Assertiveness and Ability After Having Failed or Succeeded: The (Economic) Consequences Matter!
title_full How Do People Evaluate Themselves in Terms of Assertiveness and Ability After Having Failed or Succeeded: The (Economic) Consequences Matter!
title_fullStr How Do People Evaluate Themselves in Terms of Assertiveness and Ability After Having Failed or Succeeded: The (Economic) Consequences Matter!
title_full_unstemmed How Do People Evaluate Themselves in Terms of Assertiveness and Ability After Having Failed or Succeeded: The (Economic) Consequences Matter!
title_short How Do People Evaluate Themselves in Terms of Assertiveness and Ability After Having Failed or Succeeded: The (Economic) Consequences Matter!
title_sort how do people evaluate themselves in terms of assertiveness and ability after having failed or succeeded the economic consequences matter
topic agency
assertiveness
ability
consequences of success or failure
url https://www.rips-irsp.com/articles/692
work_keys_str_mv AT delphinemiraucourt howdopeopleevaluatethemselvesintermsofassertivenessandabilityafterhavingfailedorsucceededtheeconomicconsequencesmatter
AT sylvaincaruana howdopeopleevaluatethemselvesintermsofassertivenessandabilityafterhavingfailedorsucceededtheeconomicconsequencesmatter
AT patrickmollaret howdopeopleevaluatethemselvesintermsofassertivenessandabilityafterhavingfailedorsucceededtheeconomicconsequencesmatter