How Do People Evaluate Themselves in Terms of Assertiveness and Ability After Having Failed or Succeeded: The (Economic) Consequences Matter!
Relying on the Big Two framework (Abele et al., 2016,2021) and the distinction of agency into the facets of assertiveness and ability, three experimental studies address the hypothesis that assertiveness and ability are influenced differentially by the consequences of success or failure. In Studies...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ubiquity Press
2022-10-01
|
Series: | International Review of Social Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.rips-irsp.com/articles/692 |
_version_ | 1811220841614016512 |
---|---|
author | Delphine Miraucourt Sylvain Caruana Patrick Mollaret |
author_facet | Delphine Miraucourt Sylvain Caruana Patrick Mollaret |
author_sort | Delphine Miraucourt |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Relying on the Big Two framework (Abele et al., 2016,2021) and the distinction of agency into the facets of assertiveness and ability, three experimental studies address the hypothesis that assertiveness and ability are influenced differentially by the consequences of success or failure. In Studies 1 and 2, participants had to imagine presenting a product developed by a hospital to an audience while either knowing or not knowing that selling the product could have strong positive consequences for the hospital’s budget. They further had to imagine that they had succeeded in positively presenting the product or that they had failed. Study 2 replicated the design with the participants enacting the task for real. Supporting our hypotheses, we consistently found that self-evaluation of assertiveness was higher with both success and knowledge about the economic consequences, whereas self-evaluation of ability was higher with success but without knowledge of economic consequences. These findings support the facet approach of the agency dimension and give hints on how the assertiveness versus ability facets of self-evaluation differ. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T07:48:44Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-233ca6a3ceea4b0ea69b19308ea7e8a2 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2397-8570 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T07:48:44Z |
publishDate | 2022-10-01 |
publisher | Ubiquity Press |
record_format | Article |
series | International Review of Social Psychology |
spelling | doaj.art-233ca6a3ceea4b0ea69b19308ea7e8a22022-12-22T03:41:38ZengUbiquity PressInternational Review of Social Psychology2397-85702022-10-0135110.5334/irsp.692146How Do People Evaluate Themselves in Terms of Assertiveness and Ability After Having Failed or Succeeded: The (Economic) Consequences Matter!Delphine Miraucourt0Sylvain Caruana1Patrick Mollaret2Université de Reims Champagne-ArdenneUniversité de Reims Champagne-ArdenneUniversité Paris 8 Vincennes - Saint-DenisRelying on the Big Two framework (Abele et al., 2016,2021) and the distinction of agency into the facets of assertiveness and ability, three experimental studies address the hypothesis that assertiveness and ability are influenced differentially by the consequences of success or failure. In Studies 1 and 2, participants had to imagine presenting a product developed by a hospital to an audience while either knowing or not knowing that selling the product could have strong positive consequences for the hospital’s budget. They further had to imagine that they had succeeded in positively presenting the product or that they had failed. Study 2 replicated the design with the participants enacting the task for real. Supporting our hypotheses, we consistently found that self-evaluation of assertiveness was higher with both success and knowledge about the economic consequences, whereas self-evaluation of ability was higher with success but without knowledge of economic consequences. These findings support the facet approach of the agency dimension and give hints on how the assertiveness versus ability facets of self-evaluation differ.https://www.rips-irsp.com/articles/692agencyassertivenessabilityconsequences of success or failure |
spellingShingle | Delphine Miraucourt Sylvain Caruana Patrick Mollaret How Do People Evaluate Themselves in Terms of Assertiveness and Ability After Having Failed or Succeeded: The (Economic) Consequences Matter! International Review of Social Psychology agency assertiveness ability consequences of success or failure |
title | How Do People Evaluate Themselves in Terms of Assertiveness and Ability After Having Failed or Succeeded: The (Economic) Consequences Matter! |
title_full | How Do People Evaluate Themselves in Terms of Assertiveness and Ability After Having Failed or Succeeded: The (Economic) Consequences Matter! |
title_fullStr | How Do People Evaluate Themselves in Terms of Assertiveness and Ability After Having Failed or Succeeded: The (Economic) Consequences Matter! |
title_full_unstemmed | How Do People Evaluate Themselves in Terms of Assertiveness and Ability After Having Failed or Succeeded: The (Economic) Consequences Matter! |
title_short | How Do People Evaluate Themselves in Terms of Assertiveness and Ability After Having Failed or Succeeded: The (Economic) Consequences Matter! |
title_sort | how do people evaluate themselves in terms of assertiveness and ability after having failed or succeeded the economic consequences matter |
topic | agency assertiveness ability consequences of success or failure |
url | https://www.rips-irsp.com/articles/692 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT delphinemiraucourt howdopeopleevaluatethemselvesintermsofassertivenessandabilityafterhavingfailedorsucceededtheeconomicconsequencesmatter AT sylvaincaruana howdopeopleevaluatethemselvesintermsofassertivenessandabilityafterhavingfailedorsucceededtheeconomicconsequencesmatter AT patrickmollaret howdopeopleevaluatethemselvesintermsofassertivenessandabilityafterhavingfailedorsucceededtheeconomicconsequencesmatter |