The ‘Iran’ Curtain: the historiography of Abu’l-Khairid (Shaybanid) arts of the book and the ‘Bukhara School'
In treating illustrated Persian-language manuscript arts from the medieval and early-modern periods, dynasties have come to be associated with Iran and their art forms labelled ‘Persian’ and ‘Iranian’. Materials from sixteenth-century Central Asia— implying the Abu’l-Khairid dynasty (commonly calle...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Department of Art History, University of Birmingham
2023-06-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Art Historiography |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2023/05/comstock-skipp.pdf |
| _version_ | 1797782535610040320 |
|---|---|
| author | Jaimee K. Comstock-Skipp |
| author_facet | Jaimee K. Comstock-Skipp |
| author_sort | Jaimee K. Comstock-Skipp |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In treating illustrated Persian-language manuscript arts from the medieval and early-modern periods, dynasties have come to be associated with Iran and their art forms labelled ‘Persian’ and ‘Iranian’. Materials from sixteenth-century Central Asia— implying the Abu’l-Khairid dynasty (commonly called Shaybanid Uzbek, in power 1500—1599)—challenge this classification. Scholarship has witnessed intellectual fissures dividing Iran from Central Asia, and Russian-speaking and Anglophone scholars from each other. These are not pedantic trivialities, but deliberate intrusions of national and political agendas into art historical analyses. The geographic split partitioning Iran from Central Asia has its origins in the historical battles waged between the Safavids and Abu’l-Khairids across the sixteenth century, while the linguistic and ideological rift separating English- and Russian-language academics stems from political divisions from the time of British and Romanov imperial ambitions during the late nineteenth century, through Cold-War tensions spanning the twentieth. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-13T00:12:18Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-233ddb3dfd0146e9ad52b91c276b60a0 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2042-4752 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-13T00:12:18Z |
| publishDate | 2023-06-01 |
| publisher | Department of Art History, University of Birmingham |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Art Historiography |
| spelling | doaj.art-233ddb3dfd0146e9ad52b91c276b60a02023-07-12T09:37:36ZengDepartment of Art History, University of BirminghamJournal of Art Historiography2042-47522023-06-012828JKCS110.48352/uobxjah.00004267The ‘Iran’ Curtain: the historiography of Abu’l-Khairid (Shaybanid) arts of the book and the ‘Bukhara School'Jaimee K. Comstock-Skipp 0Nizami Ganjavi Centre, University of Oxford In treating illustrated Persian-language manuscript arts from the medieval and early-modern periods, dynasties have come to be associated with Iran and their art forms labelled ‘Persian’ and ‘Iranian’. Materials from sixteenth-century Central Asia— implying the Abu’l-Khairid dynasty (commonly called Shaybanid Uzbek, in power 1500—1599)—challenge this classification. Scholarship has witnessed intellectual fissures dividing Iran from Central Asia, and Russian-speaking and Anglophone scholars from each other. These are not pedantic trivialities, but deliberate intrusions of national and political agendas into art historical analyses. The geographic split partitioning Iran from Central Asia has its origins in the historical battles waged between the Safavids and Abu’l-Khairids across the sixteenth century, while the linguistic and ideological rift separating English- and Russian-language academics stems from political divisions from the time of British and Romanov imperial ambitions during the late nineteenth century, through Cold-War tensions spanning the twentieth.https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2023/05/comstock-skipp.pdfhistoriographycodicologypersian manuscriptscentral asiaearly modern periodus—ussr political relations |
| spellingShingle | Jaimee K. Comstock-Skipp The ‘Iran’ Curtain: the historiography of Abu’l-Khairid (Shaybanid) arts of the book and the ‘Bukhara School' Journal of Art Historiography historiography codicology persian manuscripts central asia early modern period us—ussr political relations |
| title | The ‘Iran’ Curtain: the historiography of Abu’l-Khairid (Shaybanid) arts of the book and the ‘Bukhara School' |
| title_full | The ‘Iran’ Curtain: the historiography of Abu’l-Khairid (Shaybanid) arts of the book and the ‘Bukhara School' |
| title_fullStr | The ‘Iran’ Curtain: the historiography of Abu’l-Khairid (Shaybanid) arts of the book and the ‘Bukhara School' |
| title_full_unstemmed | The ‘Iran’ Curtain: the historiography of Abu’l-Khairid (Shaybanid) arts of the book and the ‘Bukhara School' |
| title_short | The ‘Iran’ Curtain: the historiography of Abu’l-Khairid (Shaybanid) arts of the book and the ‘Bukhara School' |
| title_sort | iran curtain the historiography of abu l khairid shaybanid arts of the book and the bukhara school |
| topic | historiography codicology persian manuscripts central asia early modern period us—ussr political relations |
| url | https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2023/05/comstock-skipp.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jaimeekcomstockskipp theirancurtainthehistoriographyofabulkhairidshaybanidartsofthebookandthebukharaschool AT jaimeekcomstockskipp irancurtainthehistoriographyofabulkhairidshaybanidartsofthebookandthebukharaschool |