Amplitude of Accommodation and its Relation to Refractive Errors

<b>Aims:</b> To evaluate the relationship between amplitude of accommodation and refractive errors in the peri-presbyopic age group. <b> Materials and Methods:</b> Three hundred and sixteen right eyes of 316 consecutive patients in the age group 35-50 years who attended ou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abraham Lekha, Kuriakose Thomas, Sivanandam Viswanathan, Venkatesan Nithya, Thomas Ravi, Muliyil Jayaprakash
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2005-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2005;volume=53;issue=2;spage=105;epage=108;aulast=Abraham
_version_ 1824030432200491008
author Abraham Lekha
Kuriakose Thomas
Sivanandam Viswanathan
Venkatesan Nithya
Thomas Ravi
Muliyil Jayaprakash
author_facet Abraham Lekha
Kuriakose Thomas
Sivanandam Viswanathan
Venkatesan Nithya
Thomas Ravi
Muliyil Jayaprakash
author_sort Abraham Lekha
collection DOAJ
description <b>Aims:</b> To evaluate the relationship between amplitude of accommodation and refractive errors in the peri-presbyopic age group. <b> Materials and Methods:</b> Three hundred and sixteen right eyes of 316 consecutive patients in the age group 35-50 years who attended our outpatient clinic were studied. Emmetropes, hypermetropes and myopes with best-corrected visual acuity of 6/6 J1 in both eyes were included. The amplitude of accommodation (AA) was calculated by measuring the near point of accommodation (NPA). In patients with more than &#x00B1; 2 diopter sphere correction for distance, the NPA was also measured using appropriate soft contact lenses. <b> Results:<i> </b></i> There was a statistically significant difference in AA between myopes and hypermetropes (<i> P</i> <0.005) and between myopes and emmetropes (<i> P</i> <0.005) in the 35-39 year age group. In the 40- 44 year age group, there was a significant difference in AA between emmetropes and hypermetropes (<i> P</i> <0.0001), emmetropes and myopes (<i> P</i> <0.01) and hypermetropes and myopes (<i> P</i> <0.0001). In patients above 45 years of age there was no significant difference (<i> P</i> &gt;0.5). <i> </i>Conclusion: Our study showed higher amplitude of accommodation among myopes between 35 and 44 years compared to emmetropes and hypermetropes
first_indexed 2024-12-19T18:40:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-233e398bfdd8457ebe1604a546cdaac6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0301-4738
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T18:40:45Z
publishDate 2005-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-233e398bfdd8457ebe1604a546cdaac62022-12-21T20:10:16ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Ophthalmology0301-47382005-01-01532105108Amplitude of Accommodation and its Relation to Refractive ErrorsAbraham LekhaKuriakose ThomasSivanandam ViswanathanVenkatesan NithyaThomas RaviMuliyil Jayaprakash<b>Aims:</b> To evaluate the relationship between amplitude of accommodation and refractive errors in the peri-presbyopic age group. <b> Materials and Methods:</b> Three hundred and sixteen right eyes of 316 consecutive patients in the age group 35-50 years who attended our outpatient clinic were studied. Emmetropes, hypermetropes and myopes with best-corrected visual acuity of 6/6 J1 in both eyes were included. The amplitude of accommodation (AA) was calculated by measuring the near point of accommodation (NPA). In patients with more than &#x00B1; 2 diopter sphere correction for distance, the NPA was also measured using appropriate soft contact lenses. <b> Results:<i> </b></i> There was a statistically significant difference in AA between myopes and hypermetropes (<i> P</i> <0.005) and between myopes and emmetropes (<i> P</i> <0.005) in the 35-39 year age group. In the 40- 44 year age group, there was a significant difference in AA between emmetropes and hypermetropes (<i> P</i> <0.0001), emmetropes and myopes (<i> P</i> <0.01) and hypermetropes and myopes (<i> P</i> <0.0001). In patients above 45 years of age there was no significant difference (<i> P</i> &gt;0.5). <i> </i>Conclusion: Our study showed higher amplitude of accommodation among myopes between 35 and 44 years compared to emmetropes and hypermetropeshttp://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2005;volume=53;issue=2;spage=105;epage=108;aulast=AbrahamAmplitude of accommodationrefractive erroraccommodationpresbyopia
spellingShingle Abraham Lekha
Kuriakose Thomas
Sivanandam Viswanathan
Venkatesan Nithya
Thomas Ravi
Muliyil Jayaprakash
Amplitude of Accommodation and its Relation to Refractive Errors
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Amplitude of accommodation
refractive error
accommodation
presbyopia
title Amplitude of Accommodation and its Relation to Refractive Errors
title_full Amplitude of Accommodation and its Relation to Refractive Errors
title_fullStr Amplitude of Accommodation and its Relation to Refractive Errors
title_full_unstemmed Amplitude of Accommodation and its Relation to Refractive Errors
title_short Amplitude of Accommodation and its Relation to Refractive Errors
title_sort amplitude of accommodation and its relation to refractive errors
topic Amplitude of accommodation
refractive error
accommodation
presbyopia
url http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2005;volume=53;issue=2;spage=105;epage=108;aulast=Abraham
work_keys_str_mv AT abrahamlekha amplitudeofaccommodationanditsrelationtorefractiveerrors
AT kuriakosethomas amplitudeofaccommodationanditsrelationtorefractiveerrors
AT sivanandamviswanathan amplitudeofaccommodationanditsrelationtorefractiveerrors
AT venkatesannithya amplitudeofaccommodationanditsrelationtorefractiveerrors
AT thomasravi amplitudeofaccommodationanditsrelationtorefractiveerrors
AT muliyiljayaprakash amplitudeofaccommodationanditsrelationtorefractiveerrors