Robotic-assisted tumor enucleation versus robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy for intermediate and high complexity renal cell carcinoma: a single-institution experience

Abstract Objectives To compare the perioperative and oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted tumor enucleation (RATE) and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in the treatment of intermediate and high complexity renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methods We retrospectively collected the data of 359...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kunyang Lei, Xu Wang, Zhongsheng Yang, Yuming Zhong, Yifu Liu, Ting Sun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-06-01
Series:World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03060-3
_version_ 1797806694929006592
author Kunyang Lei
Xu Wang
Zhongsheng Yang
Yuming Zhong
Yifu Liu
Ting Sun
author_facet Kunyang Lei
Xu Wang
Zhongsheng Yang
Yuming Zhong
Yifu Liu
Ting Sun
author_sort Kunyang Lei
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objectives To compare the perioperative and oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted tumor enucleation (RATE) and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in the treatment of intermediate and high complexity renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methods We retrospectively collected the data of 359 patients with intermediate and high complexity RCC who underwent RATE and RAPN. The perioperative, oncological, and pathological outcomes of the two groups were compared, and univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the risk factors for warm ischemia time (WIT) > 25 min. Results Compared with RAPN group, patients in RATE group had shorter operative time (P < 0.001), shorter WIT (P < 0.001), and less estimated blood loss (EBL) (P < 0.001). The decrease rate of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in RATE group was better than that in RAPN group (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that RAPN and higher PADUA score were independent risk factors for WIT > 25 min (both P < 0.001). The rate of positive surgical margin was similar between the two groups, but the local recurrence rate of the RATE group was higher than that of the RAPN group (P = 0.027). Conclusions RATE and RAPN have similar oncological outcomes for the treatment of intermediate and high complexity RCC. In addition, RATE was superior to RAPN in perioperative outcomes.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T06:11:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-234d91b8369645ab86f9c89da1bdc6e2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1477-7819
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T06:11:10Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series World Journal of Surgical Oncology
spelling doaj.art-234d91b8369645ab86f9c89da1bdc6e22023-06-11T11:15:54ZengBMCWorld Journal of Surgical Oncology1477-78192023-06-012111610.1186/s12957-023-03060-3Robotic-assisted tumor enucleation versus robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy for intermediate and high complexity renal cell carcinoma: a single-institution experienceKunyang Lei0Xu Wang1Zhongsheng Yang2Yuming Zhong3Yifu Liu4Ting Sun5Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang UniversityDepartment of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang UniversityDepartment of Urology, Ganzhou People’s HospitalDepartment of Urology, Ganzhou People’s HospitalDepartment of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang UniversityDepartment of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang UniversityAbstract Objectives To compare the perioperative and oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted tumor enucleation (RATE) and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in the treatment of intermediate and high complexity renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methods We retrospectively collected the data of 359 patients with intermediate and high complexity RCC who underwent RATE and RAPN. The perioperative, oncological, and pathological outcomes of the two groups were compared, and univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the risk factors for warm ischemia time (WIT) > 25 min. Results Compared with RAPN group, patients in RATE group had shorter operative time (P < 0.001), shorter WIT (P < 0.001), and less estimated blood loss (EBL) (P < 0.001). The decrease rate of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in RATE group was better than that in RAPN group (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that RAPN and higher PADUA score were independent risk factors for WIT > 25 min (both P < 0.001). The rate of positive surgical margin was similar between the two groups, but the local recurrence rate of the RATE group was higher than that of the RAPN group (P = 0.027). Conclusions RATE and RAPN have similar oncological outcomes for the treatment of intermediate and high complexity RCC. In addition, RATE was superior to RAPN in perioperative outcomes.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03060-3Complex renal cell carcinomaRATERAPNOncological outcome
spellingShingle Kunyang Lei
Xu Wang
Zhongsheng Yang
Yuming Zhong
Yifu Liu
Ting Sun
Robotic-assisted tumor enucleation versus robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy for intermediate and high complexity renal cell carcinoma: a single-institution experience
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Complex renal cell carcinoma
RATE
RAPN
Oncological outcome
title Robotic-assisted tumor enucleation versus robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy for intermediate and high complexity renal cell carcinoma: a single-institution experience
title_full Robotic-assisted tumor enucleation versus robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy for intermediate and high complexity renal cell carcinoma: a single-institution experience
title_fullStr Robotic-assisted tumor enucleation versus robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy for intermediate and high complexity renal cell carcinoma: a single-institution experience
title_full_unstemmed Robotic-assisted tumor enucleation versus robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy for intermediate and high complexity renal cell carcinoma: a single-institution experience
title_short Robotic-assisted tumor enucleation versus robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy for intermediate and high complexity renal cell carcinoma: a single-institution experience
title_sort robotic assisted tumor enucleation versus robotic assisted partial nephrectomy for intermediate and high complexity renal cell carcinoma a single institution experience
topic Complex renal cell carcinoma
RATE
RAPN
Oncological outcome
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03060-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kunyanglei roboticassistedtumorenucleationversusroboticassistedpartialnephrectomyforintermediateandhighcomplexityrenalcellcarcinomaasingleinstitutionexperience
AT xuwang roboticassistedtumorenucleationversusroboticassistedpartialnephrectomyforintermediateandhighcomplexityrenalcellcarcinomaasingleinstitutionexperience
AT zhongshengyang roboticassistedtumorenucleationversusroboticassistedpartialnephrectomyforintermediateandhighcomplexityrenalcellcarcinomaasingleinstitutionexperience
AT yumingzhong roboticassistedtumorenucleationversusroboticassistedpartialnephrectomyforintermediateandhighcomplexityrenalcellcarcinomaasingleinstitutionexperience
AT yifuliu roboticassistedtumorenucleationversusroboticassistedpartialnephrectomyforintermediateandhighcomplexityrenalcellcarcinomaasingleinstitutionexperience
AT tingsun roboticassistedtumorenucleationversusroboticassistedpartialnephrectomyforintermediateandhighcomplexityrenalcellcarcinomaasingleinstitutionexperience