Studying Aristotelian Syllogism according to Implicative and Conductive Accounts
Aristotelian Logic, the oldest system of reasoning, has always been come into focus. The Syllogism as the focal issue amid Aristotle’s logic has caused many controversial discussions. After Classic Logic expansion in the 20th century, logicians had a chance to study Aristotelian Syllogism, especiall...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen Languages
2023-07-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Philosophical Investigations |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_14487_9fa3d2142a5f208949c169159263965c.pdf |
| _version_ | 1797720253955833856 |
|---|---|
| author | Hamideh Bahmanpour Morteza Hajhosseini Gholamreza Zakiani |
| author_facet | Hamideh Bahmanpour Morteza Hajhosseini Gholamreza Zakiani |
| author_sort | Hamideh Bahmanpour |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Aristotelian Logic, the oldest system of reasoning, has always been come into focus. The Syllogism as the focal issue amid Aristotle’s logic has caused many controversial discussions. After Classic Logic expansion in the 20th century, logicians had a chance to study Aristotelian Syllogism, especially premises-conclusion relation, precisely. In 1951, Jan Lukasiewicz suggested Conditional-Implicative perception and examined the Syllogistic system within axiomatic confines. Lukasiewicz believed a conditional sentence with conjunctive premises as the antecedent could thoroughly represent a perfect mood. Twenty years later, Timothy Smiley and John Corcoran criticized Lukasiewicz’s account independently. As believed by them, Syllogism is a deduction, and Aristotelian Syllogism must be studied in the context of the Natural Deduction system. In the 80s, Paul Thom claimed that Aristotle’s Syllogism could be taken as Triadic Implication. As stated by Thom, a syllogism is a conditional sentence without a conjunctive antecedent. The present article begins with a brief introduction on each standpoint. Then the Implicative and Conductive accounts and their relation to Aristotelian Syllogism are investigated. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T09:16:43Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-2351b9a324024745afa9e3a736d6d37d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2251-7960 2423-4419 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T09:16:43Z |
| publishDate | 2023-07-01 |
| publisher | University of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen Languages |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Philosophical Investigations |
| spelling | doaj.art-2351b9a324024745afa9e3a736d6d37d2023-09-02T14:45:21ZengUniversity of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen LanguagesJournal of Philosophical Investigations2251-79602423-44192023-07-011743204610.22034/jpiut.2022.50808.315314487Studying Aristotelian Syllogism according to Implicative and Conductive AccountsHamideh Bahmanpour0Morteza Hajhosseini1Gholamreza Zakiani2PhD Candidate in Philosophical Logic, University of Isfahan, IranAssociate Professor of Philosophy Department, University of Isfahan, Iran.Associate Professor of Philosophy Department, University of Allameh Tabataba’i, IranAristotelian Logic, the oldest system of reasoning, has always been come into focus. The Syllogism as the focal issue amid Aristotle’s logic has caused many controversial discussions. After Classic Logic expansion in the 20th century, logicians had a chance to study Aristotelian Syllogism, especially premises-conclusion relation, precisely. In 1951, Jan Lukasiewicz suggested Conditional-Implicative perception and examined the Syllogistic system within axiomatic confines. Lukasiewicz believed a conditional sentence with conjunctive premises as the antecedent could thoroughly represent a perfect mood. Twenty years later, Timothy Smiley and John Corcoran criticized Lukasiewicz’s account independently. As believed by them, Syllogism is a deduction, and Aristotelian Syllogism must be studied in the context of the Natural Deduction system. In the 80s, Paul Thom claimed that Aristotle’s Syllogism could be taken as Triadic Implication. As stated by Thom, a syllogism is a conditional sentence without a conjunctive antecedent. The present article begins with a brief introduction on each standpoint. Then the Implicative and Conductive accounts and their relation to Aristotelian Syllogism are investigated.https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_14487_9fa3d2142a5f208949c169159263965c.pdfsyllogismaristotleimplicativeconductivetriadic implication |
| spellingShingle | Hamideh Bahmanpour Morteza Hajhosseini Gholamreza Zakiani Studying Aristotelian Syllogism according to Implicative and Conductive Accounts Journal of Philosophical Investigations syllogism aristotle implicative conductive triadic implication |
| title | Studying Aristotelian Syllogism according to Implicative and Conductive Accounts |
| title_full | Studying Aristotelian Syllogism according to Implicative and Conductive Accounts |
| title_fullStr | Studying Aristotelian Syllogism according to Implicative and Conductive Accounts |
| title_full_unstemmed | Studying Aristotelian Syllogism according to Implicative and Conductive Accounts |
| title_short | Studying Aristotelian Syllogism according to Implicative and Conductive Accounts |
| title_sort | studying aristotelian syllogism according to implicative and conductive accounts |
| topic | syllogism aristotle implicative conductive triadic implication |
| url | https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_14487_9fa3d2142a5f208949c169159263965c.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hamidehbahmanpour studyingaristoteliansyllogismaccordingtoimplicativeandconductiveaccounts AT mortezahajhosseini studyingaristoteliansyllogismaccordingtoimplicativeandconductiveaccounts AT gholamrezazakiani studyingaristoteliansyllogismaccordingtoimplicativeandconductiveaccounts |