Does Mode of Access Make a Difference? Mobile Learning and online student engagement

Even though student use of mobile devices for educational purposes has increased in recent years, the research on the possible impact on student success or engagement has been minimal. This study investigated the impact of mobile device use on student engagement and student success in online course...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sarah Nichter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Online Learning Consortium 2021-09-01
Series:Online Learning
Subjects:
Online Access:https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/2848
_version_ 1797327745855782912
author Sarah Nichter
author_facet Sarah Nichter
author_sort Sarah Nichter
collection DOAJ
description Even though student use of mobile devices for educational purposes has increased in recent years, the research on the possible impact on student success or engagement has been minimal. This study investigated the impact of mobile device use on student engagement and student success in online courses. The theory of Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) was a foundation for understanding and measuring engagement behaviors of online students. The Online Self-Regulated Learning Questionnaire (OSLQ) was the basis of the survey instrument. Participants were categorized into three groups of mobile device use (low, moderate, high). These three groups were used for comparison in each of the research questions. The research questions ask what impacts mobile learning has on student engagement, as measured with SRL; what impact mobile learning has on the SRL constructs of environment structuring, task management, and time management; and what associations mobile learning might have with student success and persistence. The ANOVA showed that mobile learning had a moderate impact on engagement for students in the high group. Students in each group engaged in environment structuring behaviors more than task strategies or time management behaviors. Students in the moderate and high groups engaged in task strategies more than the low group. Students in the high group engaged in time management behaviors more than the other groups.  The Crosstab analysis did not show an association between levels of mobile learning and course grade or persistence. These findings have positive implications for online pedagogy and course design.                 Keywords: Mobile Learning; online learning; student engagement; Self-Regulated Learning; student success
first_indexed 2024-03-08T06:42:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2354a3579c5a4ff5a7c0cb6760f0d933
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2472-5749
2472-5730
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T06:42:59Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher Online Learning Consortium
record_format Article
series Online Learning
spelling doaj.art-2354a3579c5a4ff5a7c0cb6760f0d9332024-02-03T08:25:14ZengOnline Learning ConsortiumOnline Learning2472-57492472-57302021-09-0125310.24059/olj.v25i3.2848Does Mode of Access Make a Difference? Mobile Learning and online student engagementSarah Nichter0University of the Cumberlands Even though student use of mobile devices for educational purposes has increased in recent years, the research on the possible impact on student success or engagement has been minimal. This study investigated the impact of mobile device use on student engagement and student success in online courses. The theory of Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) was a foundation for understanding and measuring engagement behaviors of online students. The Online Self-Regulated Learning Questionnaire (OSLQ) was the basis of the survey instrument. Participants were categorized into three groups of mobile device use (low, moderate, high). These three groups were used for comparison in each of the research questions. The research questions ask what impacts mobile learning has on student engagement, as measured with SRL; what impact mobile learning has on the SRL constructs of environment structuring, task management, and time management; and what associations mobile learning might have with student success and persistence. The ANOVA showed that mobile learning had a moderate impact on engagement for students in the high group. Students in each group engaged in environment structuring behaviors more than task strategies or time management behaviors. Students in the moderate and high groups engaged in task strategies more than the low group. Students in the high group engaged in time management behaviors more than the other groups.  The Crosstab analysis did not show an association between levels of mobile learning and course grade or persistence. These findings have positive implications for online pedagogy and course design.                 Keywords: Mobile Learning; online learning; student engagement; Self-Regulated Learning; student success https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/2848mobile learningonline learningstudent engagementself-regulated learningstudent success
spellingShingle Sarah Nichter
Does Mode of Access Make a Difference? Mobile Learning and online student engagement
Online Learning
mobile learning
online learning
student engagement
self-regulated learning
student success
title Does Mode of Access Make a Difference? Mobile Learning and online student engagement
title_full Does Mode of Access Make a Difference? Mobile Learning and online student engagement
title_fullStr Does Mode of Access Make a Difference? Mobile Learning and online student engagement
title_full_unstemmed Does Mode of Access Make a Difference? Mobile Learning and online student engagement
title_short Does Mode of Access Make a Difference? Mobile Learning and online student engagement
title_sort does mode of access make a difference mobile learning and online student engagement
topic mobile learning
online learning
student engagement
self-regulated learning
student success
url https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/2848
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahnichter doesmodeofaccessmakeadifferencemobilelearningandonlinestudentengagement