Technical and biological review of authorized medical devices for platelets-rich plasma preparation in the field of regenerative medicine

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has seen increased interest and utilization over the past decade, particularly in the field of musculoskeletal disease. This growth has been accompanied by the development of medical devices to realize PRP preparation which includes blood collection, centrifugation, and PR...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jeremy Magalon, Thibault Brandin, Pauline Francois, Clara Degioanni, Lucille De Maria, Fanny Grimaud, Julie Veran, Francoise Dignat-George, Florence Sabatier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2021-02-01
Series:Platelets
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537104.2020.1832653
_version_ 1827816810333863936
author Jeremy Magalon
Thibault Brandin
Pauline Francois
Clara Degioanni
Lucille De Maria
Fanny Grimaud
Julie Veran
Francoise Dignat-George
Florence Sabatier
author_facet Jeremy Magalon
Thibault Brandin
Pauline Francois
Clara Degioanni
Lucille De Maria
Fanny Grimaud
Julie Veran
Francoise Dignat-George
Florence Sabatier
author_sort Jeremy Magalon
collection DOAJ
description Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has seen increased interest and utilization over the past decade, particularly in the field of musculoskeletal disease. This growth has been accompanied by the development of medical devices to realize PRP preparation which includes blood collection, centrifugation, and PRP isolation. The final PRP composition is directly influenced by this preparation step and absence of biological quality control led to a lack of comparability between PRP products that could explain the large variability in the clinical benefit of PRP reported in literature. To circumvent this issue, the scientific community developed different PRP classifications but none of them have been adopted. The goal of this review is to furnish both technical and biological characteristics from PRP commercial systems. On review of 1379 studies, 105 studies were selected according to inclusion criteria for technical analysis and led to the identification of 50 commercial systems that have been classified in three technical categories based on the blood harvesting technique (tubes, syringes or bags). Twelve studies were selected and sufficiently describe biological characteristics from only 14 commercial systems from the 50 identified in the technical analysis. Inclusion of duplicates characterization from a same PRP system lead to the final analysis of 36 PRP preparations that met the inclusion criteria of the biological analysis. All these PRP preparations have been classified among the seven existing classifications. Comparison from all biological parameters and classifications revealed a large heterogeneity among the available current PRP commercial systems. Index of biological sensitivity of classifications to distinguish PRP preparations were also variable. Although these findings should help clinicians in selecting a system that meets their specific needs, this also raises the question to standardize the parameters to biologically define PRP preparation among users and to systematically performed PRP qualification when used.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T00:25:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2356b1d8fbdf45059420ce2bf9a51a39
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0953-7104
1369-1635
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T00:25:57Z
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Platelets
spelling doaj.art-2356b1d8fbdf45059420ce2bf9a51a392023-09-15T10:38:08ZengTaylor & Francis GroupPlatelets0953-71041369-16352021-02-0132220020810.1080/09537104.2020.18326531832653Technical and biological review of authorized medical devices for platelets-rich plasma preparation in the field of regenerative medicineJeremy Magalon0Thibault Brandin1Pauline Francois2Clara Degioanni3Lucille De Maria4Fanny Grimaud5Julie Veran6Francoise Dignat-George7Florence Sabatier8Cell Therapy Laboratory, Hôpital De La Conception, AP-HMCell Therapy Laboratory, Hôpital De La Conception, AP-HMCell Therapy Laboratory, Hôpital De La Conception, AP-HMCell Therapy Laboratory, Hôpital De La Conception, AP-HMCell Therapy Laboratory, Hôpital De La Conception, AP-HMCell Therapy Laboratory, Hôpital De La Conception, AP-HMCell Therapy Laboratory, Hôpital De La Conception, AP-HMAix Marseille UnivCell Therapy Laboratory, Hôpital De La Conception, AP-HMPlatelet-rich plasma (PRP) has seen increased interest and utilization over the past decade, particularly in the field of musculoskeletal disease. This growth has been accompanied by the development of medical devices to realize PRP preparation which includes blood collection, centrifugation, and PRP isolation. The final PRP composition is directly influenced by this preparation step and absence of biological quality control led to a lack of comparability between PRP products that could explain the large variability in the clinical benefit of PRP reported in literature. To circumvent this issue, the scientific community developed different PRP classifications but none of them have been adopted. The goal of this review is to furnish both technical and biological characteristics from PRP commercial systems. On review of 1379 studies, 105 studies were selected according to inclusion criteria for technical analysis and led to the identification of 50 commercial systems that have been classified in three technical categories based on the blood harvesting technique (tubes, syringes or bags). Twelve studies were selected and sufficiently describe biological characteristics from only 14 commercial systems from the 50 identified in the technical analysis. Inclusion of duplicates characterization from a same PRP system lead to the final analysis of 36 PRP preparations that met the inclusion criteria of the biological analysis. All these PRP preparations have been classified among the seven existing classifications. Comparison from all biological parameters and classifications revealed a large heterogeneity among the available current PRP commercial systems. Index of biological sensitivity of classifications to distinguish PRP preparations were also variable. Although these findings should help clinicians in selecting a system that meets their specific needs, this also raises the question to standardize the parameters to biologically define PRP preparation among users and to systematically performed PRP qualification when used.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537104.2020.1832653regenerative medecineplatelet-rich-plasma (prp)plateletsquality controlclassification
spellingShingle Jeremy Magalon
Thibault Brandin
Pauline Francois
Clara Degioanni
Lucille De Maria
Fanny Grimaud
Julie Veran
Francoise Dignat-George
Florence Sabatier
Technical and biological review of authorized medical devices for platelets-rich plasma preparation in the field of regenerative medicine
Platelets
regenerative medecine
platelet-rich-plasma (prp)
platelets
quality control
classification
title Technical and biological review of authorized medical devices for platelets-rich plasma preparation in the field of regenerative medicine
title_full Technical and biological review of authorized medical devices for platelets-rich plasma preparation in the field of regenerative medicine
title_fullStr Technical and biological review of authorized medical devices for platelets-rich plasma preparation in the field of regenerative medicine
title_full_unstemmed Technical and biological review of authorized medical devices for platelets-rich plasma preparation in the field of regenerative medicine
title_short Technical and biological review of authorized medical devices for platelets-rich plasma preparation in the field of regenerative medicine
title_sort technical and biological review of authorized medical devices for platelets rich plasma preparation in the field of regenerative medicine
topic regenerative medecine
platelet-rich-plasma (prp)
platelets
quality control
classification
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537104.2020.1832653
work_keys_str_mv AT jeremymagalon technicalandbiologicalreviewofauthorizedmedicaldevicesforplateletsrichplasmapreparationinthefieldofregenerativemedicine
AT thibaultbrandin technicalandbiologicalreviewofauthorizedmedicaldevicesforplateletsrichplasmapreparationinthefieldofregenerativemedicine
AT paulinefrancois technicalandbiologicalreviewofauthorizedmedicaldevicesforplateletsrichplasmapreparationinthefieldofregenerativemedicine
AT claradegioanni technicalandbiologicalreviewofauthorizedmedicaldevicesforplateletsrichplasmapreparationinthefieldofregenerativemedicine
AT lucilledemaria technicalandbiologicalreviewofauthorizedmedicaldevicesforplateletsrichplasmapreparationinthefieldofregenerativemedicine
AT fannygrimaud technicalandbiologicalreviewofauthorizedmedicaldevicesforplateletsrichplasmapreparationinthefieldofregenerativemedicine
AT julieveran technicalandbiologicalreviewofauthorizedmedicaldevicesforplateletsrichplasmapreparationinthefieldofregenerativemedicine
AT francoisedignatgeorge technicalandbiologicalreviewofauthorizedmedicaldevicesforplateletsrichplasmapreparationinthefieldofregenerativemedicine
AT florencesabatier technicalandbiologicalreviewofauthorizedmedicaldevicesforplateletsrichplasmapreparationinthefieldofregenerativemedicine