Determining the gaps between Cochrane reviews and trials of effectiveness of interventions for acute respiratory infections: an audit
Abstract Background Cochrane primarily aims to systematically review trials of effectiveness that are important to inform clinical decisions. Editorial groups support authors to achieve high-quality reviews and prioritise review proposals in their clinical domain that are submitted or elicited. Prio...
Main Authors: | Jasmin Alloo, Sanya Vallath, Chris Del Mar, Matt Carter, Sarah Thorning, Justin Clark |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-04-01
|
Series: | Systematic Reviews |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-017-0472-0 |
Similar Items
-
Prioritising Cochrane reviews to be updated with health equity focus
by: Eve Tomlinson, et al.
Published: (2023-05-01) -
Saskatchewan Residents’ Use of The Cochrane Library
by: Dorothy Anne Forbes, et al.
Published: (2007-09-01) -
The impact of Cochrane Reviews: a mixed-methods evaluation of outputs from Cochrane Review Groups supported by the National Institute for Health Research
by: Frances Bunn, et al.
Published: (2015-04-01) -
Applications of Crowdsourcing in Evidence Synthesis: A Case Study of Cochrane Crowd
by: LI Xiao, QU Jiansheng, KOU Leilei
Published: (2023-02-01) -
Frequency and characteristics of promissory conference abstracts, i.e. abstracts without results, accepted at Cochrane Colloquia 1994-2020
by: Darko Novak, et al.
Published: (2021-11-01)