Validity and Reliability of the Iranian Version of eHealth Literacy Scale

Abstract: Introduction:  The eHEALS is an 8-item measure of eHealth literacy developed to measure consumers’ combined knowledge, comfort, and perceived skills at finding, evaluating, and applying electronic health information to health problems. The current study aims to measure...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Soheila Bazm, Masoud Mirzaei, Hossein Fallahzadeh, Reihaneh Bazm
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences 2016-06-01
Series:Journal of Community Health Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jhr.ssu.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1117-4&slc_lang=en&sid=1
_version_ 1811313648073703424
author Soheila Bazm
Masoud Mirzaei
Hossein Fallahzadeh
Reihaneh Bazm
author_facet Soheila Bazm
Masoud Mirzaei
Hossein Fallahzadeh
Reihaneh Bazm
author_sort Soheila Bazm
collection DOAJ
description Abstract: Introduction: &nbsp;The eHEALS is an 8-item measure of eHealth literacy developed to measure consumers&rsquo; combined knowledge, comfort, and perceived skills at finding, evaluating, and applying electronic health information to health problems. The current study aims to measure validity and reliability of the Iranian version of eHEALS questionnaire in a population context. Materials & Methods: A cross-sectional study was done on 525 youths people who has been chosen randomly in Iran, Yazd. We determined content validity, construct validity and predictive validity of the translated questionnaire. Principal components factor analysis was used to determine the theoretical fit of the measures with the data. The internal consistency of the translated questionnaire was evaluated using Cronbach &alpha; coefficient. The results were analyzed in SPSSv16. Results: The principal component analysis (PCA) produced a single factor solution (70.48% of variance) with factor loading ranging from 0.723 to 0.862. The internal consistency of the scale was sufficient (alpha=0.88 , P<0.001) and the test-retest coefficients for the items were reliable (r= 0.96, P<0.001). Discussion: The results of the study showed that the items in the translated questionnaire were equivalent to the original scale .The version of the eHEALS questionnaire showed both good reliability and validity for the screening of eHealth literacy of Iranian people.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T10:58:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-23735ae83e3440e190907261158143a6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2322-5688
2345-2609
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T10:58:32Z
publishDate 2016-06-01
publisher Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Journal of Community Health Research
spelling doaj.art-23735ae83e3440e190907261158143a62022-12-22T02:49:28ZengShahid Sadoughi University of Medical SciencesJournal of Community Health Research2322-56882345-26092016-06-0152121130Validity and Reliability of the Iranian Version of eHealth Literacy ScaleSoheila Bazm0Masoud Mirzaei1Hossein Fallahzadeh2Reihaneh Bazm3 Abstract: Introduction: &nbsp;The eHEALS is an 8-item measure of eHealth literacy developed to measure consumers&rsquo; combined knowledge, comfort, and perceived skills at finding, evaluating, and applying electronic health information to health problems. The current study aims to measure validity and reliability of the Iranian version of eHEALS questionnaire in a population context. Materials & Methods: A cross-sectional study was done on 525 youths people who has been chosen randomly in Iran, Yazd. We determined content validity, construct validity and predictive validity of the translated questionnaire. Principal components factor analysis was used to determine the theoretical fit of the measures with the data. The internal consistency of the translated questionnaire was evaluated using Cronbach &alpha; coefficient. The results were analyzed in SPSSv16. Results: The principal component analysis (PCA) produced a single factor solution (70.48% of variance) with factor loading ranging from 0.723 to 0.862. The internal consistency of the scale was sufficient (alpha=0.88 , P<0.001) and the test-retest coefficients for the items were reliable (r= 0.96, P<0.001). Discussion: The results of the study showed that the items in the translated questionnaire were equivalent to the original scale .The version of the eHEALS questionnaire showed both good reliability and validity for the screening of eHealth literacy of Iranian people.http://jhr.ssu.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1117-4&slc_lang=en&sid=1eHealth Literacy eHEALS questionnaire Validity Reliability
spellingShingle Soheila Bazm
Masoud Mirzaei
Hossein Fallahzadeh
Reihaneh Bazm
Validity and Reliability of the Iranian Version of eHealth Literacy Scale
Journal of Community Health Research
eHealth Literacy
eHEALS questionnaire
Validity
Reliability
title Validity and Reliability of the Iranian Version of eHealth Literacy Scale
title_full Validity and Reliability of the Iranian Version of eHealth Literacy Scale
title_fullStr Validity and Reliability of the Iranian Version of eHealth Literacy Scale
title_full_unstemmed Validity and Reliability of the Iranian Version of eHealth Literacy Scale
title_short Validity and Reliability of the Iranian Version of eHealth Literacy Scale
title_sort validity and reliability of the iranian version of ehealth literacy scale
topic eHealth Literacy
eHEALS questionnaire
Validity
Reliability
url http://jhr.ssu.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1117-4&slc_lang=en&sid=1
work_keys_str_mv AT soheilabazm validityandreliabilityoftheiranianversionofehealthliteracyscale
AT masoudmirzaei validityandreliabilityoftheiranianversionofehealthliteracyscale
AT hosseinfallahzadeh validityandreliabilityoftheiranianversionofehealthliteracyscale
AT reihanehbazm validityandreliabilityoftheiranianversionofehealthliteracyscale