Representationalism and Ambiguous Figures

The phenomenon of ambiguous figures raises difficulties for the theories of the content of our visual experience that hold that its phenomenal character is identical to its representational content and wholly nonconceptual. This phenomenon seems to show that there can be a difference in the phenomen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Arianna Uggé
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Rosenberg & Sellier 2016-11-01
Series:Phenomenology and Mind
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/pam/article/view/7117
_version_ 1818367073133264896
author Arianna Uggé
author_facet Arianna Uggé
author_sort Arianna Uggé
collection DOAJ
description The phenomenon of ambiguous figures raises difficulties for the theories of the content of our visual experience that hold that its phenomenal character is identical to its representational content and wholly nonconceptual. This phenomenon seems to show that there can be a difference in the phenomenal character of two visual experiences, without a difference in their representational nonconceptual content. Firstly, I shall try to illustrate that these “representationalist” theories cannot provide a compelling explanation for the phenomenon of ambiguous figures. Secondly, I will present an account of it grounded on Peacocke’s “dual nonconceptual content” view. The distinction he draws between two levels of nonconceptual content can be used to explain the phenomenon without abandoning the thesis that the phenomenal character of our visual experience is a representational wholly nonconceptual content.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T22:46:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-237475f5edcb47bc81ea93a525a04535
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2280-7853
2239-4028
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T22:46:15Z
publishDate 2016-11-01
publisher Rosenberg & Sellier
record_format Article
series Phenomenology and Mind
spelling doaj.art-237475f5edcb47bc81ea93a525a045352022-12-21T23:28:44ZengRosenberg & SellierPhenomenology and Mind2280-78532239-40282016-11-01410.13128/Phe_Mi-1959816417Representationalism and Ambiguous FiguresArianna UggéThe phenomenon of ambiguous figures raises difficulties for the theories of the content of our visual experience that hold that its phenomenal character is identical to its representational content and wholly nonconceptual. This phenomenon seems to show that there can be a difference in the phenomenal character of two visual experiences, without a difference in their representational nonconceptual content. Firstly, I shall try to illustrate that these “representationalist” theories cannot provide a compelling explanation for the phenomenon of ambiguous figures. Secondly, I will present an account of it grounded on Peacocke’s “dual nonconceptual content” view. The distinction he draws between two levels of nonconceptual content can be used to explain the phenomenon without abandoning the thesis that the phenomenal character of our visual experience is a representational wholly nonconceptual content.https://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/pam/article/view/7117representationalismambiguous figuresvisual experience
spellingShingle Arianna Uggé
Representationalism and Ambiguous Figures
Phenomenology and Mind
representationalism
ambiguous figures
visual experience
title Representationalism and Ambiguous Figures
title_full Representationalism and Ambiguous Figures
title_fullStr Representationalism and Ambiguous Figures
title_full_unstemmed Representationalism and Ambiguous Figures
title_short Representationalism and Ambiguous Figures
title_sort representationalism and ambiguous figures
topic representationalism
ambiguous figures
visual experience
url https://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/pam/article/view/7117
work_keys_str_mv AT ariannaugge representationalismandambiguousfigures