Justice et mondialisation. Eric Weil et le problème de l’Etat mondial

In the last part of his Political Philosophy, Eric Weil talks about the advent of a world state. The establishment of such a state would be demanded by modern society which is by principle global, rational and pacifist. In modern times, this same society had called on states to become rational a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Corneliu Bîlbă
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AXIS Academic Foundation Press 2021-01-01
Series:Argumentum: Journal of the Seminar of Discursive Logic, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.fssp.uaic.ro/argumentum/Numarul%2019%20issue%201/04_Bilba_tehno.pdf
_version_ 1818945681951293440
author Corneliu Bîlbă
author_facet Corneliu Bîlbă
author_sort Corneliu Bîlbă
collection DOAJ
description In the last part of his Political Philosophy, Eric Weil talks about the advent of a world state. The establishment of such a state would be demanded by modern society which is by principle global, rational and pacifist. In modern times, this same society had called on states to become rational actors in order to organize production and educate individuals to rationality. But states have been able to use rational and calculated violence against each other and against the fundamental objective of society, which is peace. Now there is a global society – globalized by economic mechanisms and cultural processes – that require states to overcome their historical disputes. So peace is required by the correct calculation of interests. But peace would not be possible if states do not move from rational calculation to reasonable discussion. This movement is required not only by universal morality, but also by some pragmatic considerations. In 1954, Weil believed that the foundation of world institutions was a beginning, and that European integration was a step towards the creation of a world state. In this article, I show that Eric Weil's philosophy of international relations is a realistic utopia in the manner of Rawls, since the mode of organization of the world state is to be constructed. Weil is a kind of constructivist that finds a certain balance between realism and idealism, between the rational and the reasonable. I try to confront the liberal model of the historical tendency (perpetual peace) with the realist model of cyclical struggle (hegemony) in order to suggest that there is a non-ideal part of the problem.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T08:02:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2374ca68e9424671886b9493dfe61465
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1583-2767
2069-573X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T08:02:59Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher AXIS Academic Foundation Press
record_format Article
series Argumentum: Journal of the Seminar of Discursive Logic, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric
spelling doaj.art-2374ca68e9424671886b9493dfe614652022-12-21T19:47:29ZengAXIS Academic Foundation PressArgumentum: Journal of the Seminar of Discursive Logic, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric1583-27672069-573X2021-01-011916682Justice et mondialisation. Eric Weil et le problème de l’Etat mondialCorneliu Bîlbă0Al.I. Cuza University of Iasi, RomaniaIn the last part of his Political Philosophy, Eric Weil talks about the advent of a world state. The establishment of such a state would be demanded by modern society which is by principle global, rational and pacifist. In modern times, this same society had called on states to become rational actors in order to organize production and educate individuals to rationality. But states have been able to use rational and calculated violence against each other and against the fundamental objective of society, which is peace. Now there is a global society – globalized by economic mechanisms and cultural processes – that require states to overcome their historical disputes. So peace is required by the correct calculation of interests. But peace would not be possible if states do not move from rational calculation to reasonable discussion. This movement is required not only by universal morality, but also by some pragmatic considerations. In 1954, Weil believed that the foundation of world institutions was a beginning, and that European integration was a step towards the creation of a world state. In this article, I show that Eric Weil's philosophy of international relations is a realistic utopia in the manner of Rawls, since the mode of organization of the world state is to be constructed. Weil is a kind of constructivist that finds a certain balance between realism and idealism, between the rational and the reasonable. I try to confront the liberal model of the historical tendency (perpetual peace) with the realist model of cyclical struggle (hegemony) in order to suggest that there is a non-ideal part of the problem.https://www.fssp.uaic.ro/argumentum/Numarul%2019%20issue%201/04_Bilba_tehno.pdfjusticeglobalizationworld staterealismidealismeric weilrealist utopiainternational relations
spellingShingle Corneliu Bîlbă
Justice et mondialisation. Eric Weil et le problème de l’Etat mondial
Argumentum: Journal of the Seminar of Discursive Logic, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric
justice
globalization
world state
realism
idealism
eric weil
realist utopia
international relations
title Justice et mondialisation. Eric Weil et le problème de l’Etat mondial
title_full Justice et mondialisation. Eric Weil et le problème de l’Etat mondial
title_fullStr Justice et mondialisation. Eric Weil et le problème de l’Etat mondial
title_full_unstemmed Justice et mondialisation. Eric Weil et le problème de l’Etat mondial
title_short Justice et mondialisation. Eric Weil et le problème de l’Etat mondial
title_sort justice et mondialisation eric weil et le probleme de l etat mondial
topic justice
globalization
world state
realism
idealism
eric weil
realist utopia
international relations
url https://www.fssp.uaic.ro/argumentum/Numarul%2019%20issue%201/04_Bilba_tehno.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT corneliubilba justiceetmondialisationericweiletleproblemedeletatmondial