The tiny effects of respiratory masks on physiological, subjective, and behavioral measures under mental load in a randomized controlled trial
Abstract Since the outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), face coverings are recommended to diminish person-to-person transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Some public debates concern claims regarding risks caused by wearing face masks, like, e.g., decreased blood oxygen levels and impaired...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2021-10-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99100-7 |
_version_ | 1818346112473366528 |
---|---|
author | Robert P. Spang Kerstin Pieper |
author_facet | Robert P. Spang Kerstin Pieper |
author_sort | Robert P. Spang |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Since the outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), face coverings are recommended to diminish person-to-person transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Some public debates concern claims regarding risks caused by wearing face masks, like, e.g., decreased blood oxygen levels and impaired cognitive capabilities. The present, pre-registered study aims to contribute clarity by delivering a direct comparison of wearing an N95 respirator and wearing no face covering. We focused on a demanding situation to show that cognitive efficacy and individual states are equivalent in both conditions. We conducted a randomized-controlled crossover trial with 44 participants. Participants performed the task while wearing an N95 FFR versus wearing none. We measured physiological (blood oxygen saturation and heart rate variability), behavioral (parameters of performance in the task), and subjective (perceived mental load) data to substantiate our assumption as broadly as possible. We analyzed data regarding both statistical equivalence and differences. All of the investigated dimensions showed statistical equivalence given our pre-registered equivalence boundaries. None of the dimensions showed a significant difference between wearing an FFR and not wearing an FFR. Trial Registration: Preregistered with the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/c2xp5 (15/11/2020). Retrospectively registered with German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00024806 (18/03/2021). |
first_indexed | 2024-12-13T17:13:05Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-23791c9df5db470692c2fb2bc577a894 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2045-2322 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-13T17:13:05Z |
publishDate | 2021-10-01 |
publisher | Nature Portfolio |
record_format | Article |
series | Scientific Reports |
spelling | doaj.art-23791c9df5db470692c2fb2bc577a8942022-12-21T23:37:30ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222021-10-0111111110.1038/s41598-021-99100-7The tiny effects of respiratory masks on physiological, subjective, and behavioral measures under mental load in a randomized controlled trialRobert P. Spang0Kerstin Pieper1Quality and Usability Lab, Institute of Software Engineering and Theoretical Computer Science, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Technical University of BerlinQuality and Usability Lab, Institute of Software Engineering and Theoretical Computer Science, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Technical University of BerlinAbstract Since the outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), face coverings are recommended to diminish person-to-person transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Some public debates concern claims regarding risks caused by wearing face masks, like, e.g., decreased blood oxygen levels and impaired cognitive capabilities. The present, pre-registered study aims to contribute clarity by delivering a direct comparison of wearing an N95 respirator and wearing no face covering. We focused on a demanding situation to show that cognitive efficacy and individual states are equivalent in both conditions. We conducted a randomized-controlled crossover trial with 44 participants. Participants performed the task while wearing an N95 FFR versus wearing none. We measured physiological (blood oxygen saturation and heart rate variability), behavioral (parameters of performance in the task), and subjective (perceived mental load) data to substantiate our assumption as broadly as possible. We analyzed data regarding both statistical equivalence and differences. All of the investigated dimensions showed statistical equivalence given our pre-registered equivalence boundaries. None of the dimensions showed a significant difference between wearing an FFR and not wearing an FFR. Trial Registration: Preregistered with the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/c2xp5 (15/11/2020). Retrospectively registered with German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00024806 (18/03/2021).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99100-7 |
spellingShingle | Robert P. Spang Kerstin Pieper The tiny effects of respiratory masks on physiological, subjective, and behavioral measures under mental load in a randomized controlled trial Scientific Reports |
title | The tiny effects of respiratory masks on physiological, subjective, and behavioral measures under mental load in a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | The tiny effects of respiratory masks on physiological, subjective, and behavioral measures under mental load in a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The tiny effects of respiratory masks on physiological, subjective, and behavioral measures under mental load in a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The tiny effects of respiratory masks on physiological, subjective, and behavioral measures under mental load in a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | The tiny effects of respiratory masks on physiological, subjective, and behavioral measures under mental load in a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | tiny effects of respiratory masks on physiological subjective and behavioral measures under mental load in a randomized controlled trial |
url | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99100-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robertpspang thetinyeffectsofrespiratorymasksonphysiologicalsubjectiveandbehavioralmeasuresundermentalloadinarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kerstinpieper thetinyeffectsofrespiratorymasksonphysiologicalsubjectiveandbehavioralmeasuresundermentalloadinarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT robertpspang tinyeffectsofrespiratorymasksonphysiologicalsubjectiveandbehavioralmeasuresundermentalloadinarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kerstinpieper tinyeffectsofrespiratorymasksonphysiologicalsubjectiveandbehavioralmeasuresundermentalloadinarandomizedcontrolledtrial |