Temporal change in urban fish biodiversity—Gains, losses, and drivers of change

Abstract Our aim was to examine temporal change in alpha and beta diversity of freshwater fish communities in rivers that have urbanized over the same period to understand the influence of changes in land use and river connectivity on community change. We used biological (2001–2018), land use (2000–...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lauren Lawson, Christopher B. Edge, Marie‐Josée Fortin, Donald A. Jackson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-02-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10845
_version_ 1827572794196492288
author Lauren Lawson
Christopher B. Edge
Marie‐Josée Fortin
Donald A. Jackson
author_facet Lauren Lawson
Christopher B. Edge
Marie‐Josée Fortin
Donald A. Jackson
author_sort Lauren Lawson
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Our aim was to examine temporal change in alpha and beta diversity of freshwater fish communities in rivers that have urbanized over the same period to understand the influence of changes in land use and river connectivity on community change. We used biological (2001–2018), land use (2000–2015), and connectivity data (1987–2017) from Toronto, Ontario, Canada. We used linear mixed effects models to determine the strength of upstream land use, connectivity, and their changes over time to explain temporal change in alpha and beta diversity indices. We examined beta diversity using the temporal beta diversity index (TBI) to assess site‐specific community change. The TBI was partitioned into gains and losses, and species‐specific changes in abundance were assessed using paired t‐tests. There were more gains than losses across the study sites as measured by TBI. We found little to no significant differences in species‐specific abundances at aggregated spatial scales (study region, watershed, stream order). We found different relationships between landscape and connectivity variables with the biodiversity indices tested; however, almost all estimated confidence intervals overlapped with zero and had low goodness‐of‐fit. More fish biodiversity gains than losses were found across the study region, as measured by TBI. We found TBI to be a useful indicator of change as it identifies key sites to further investigate. We found two high value TBI sites gained non‐native species, and one site shifted from a cool‐water to warm‐water species dominated community, both of which have management implications. Upstream catchment land use and connectivity had poor explanatory power for change in the measured biodiversity indices. Ultimately, such spatial–temporal datasets are invaluable and can reveal trends in biodiversity useful for environmental management when considering competing interests involved with urban sprawl in the ongoing “Decade on Restoration.”
first_indexed 2024-03-07T19:28:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-237bd4a8a97148389405c3395d33462c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7758
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T19:28:41Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj.art-237bd4a8a97148389405c3395d33462c2024-02-29T08:56:39ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582024-02-01142n/an/a10.1002/ece3.10845Temporal change in urban fish biodiversity—Gains, losses, and drivers of changeLauren Lawson0Christopher B. Edge1Marie‐Josée Fortin2Donald A. Jackson3Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaNatural Resources Canada Canadian Forest Service Atlantic Forestry Center Fredericton New Brunswick CanadaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaAbstract Our aim was to examine temporal change in alpha and beta diversity of freshwater fish communities in rivers that have urbanized over the same period to understand the influence of changes in land use and river connectivity on community change. We used biological (2001–2018), land use (2000–2015), and connectivity data (1987–2017) from Toronto, Ontario, Canada. We used linear mixed effects models to determine the strength of upstream land use, connectivity, and their changes over time to explain temporal change in alpha and beta diversity indices. We examined beta diversity using the temporal beta diversity index (TBI) to assess site‐specific community change. The TBI was partitioned into gains and losses, and species‐specific changes in abundance were assessed using paired t‐tests. There were more gains than losses across the study sites as measured by TBI. We found little to no significant differences in species‐specific abundances at aggregated spatial scales (study region, watershed, stream order). We found different relationships between landscape and connectivity variables with the biodiversity indices tested; however, almost all estimated confidence intervals overlapped with zero and had low goodness‐of‐fit. More fish biodiversity gains than losses were found across the study region, as measured by TBI. We found TBI to be a useful indicator of change as it identifies key sites to further investigate. We found two high value TBI sites gained non‐native species, and one site shifted from a cool‐water to warm‐water species dominated community, both of which have management implications. Upstream catchment land use and connectivity had poor explanatory power for change in the measured biodiversity indices. Ultimately, such spatial–temporal datasets are invaluable and can reveal trends in biodiversity useful for environmental management when considering competing interests involved with urban sprawl in the ongoing “Decade on Restoration.”https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10845fish community ecologyfreshwater ecologytemporal biodiversityurban ecologyurban riverswatersheds
spellingShingle Lauren Lawson
Christopher B. Edge
Marie‐Josée Fortin
Donald A. Jackson
Temporal change in urban fish biodiversity—Gains, losses, and drivers of change
Ecology and Evolution
fish community ecology
freshwater ecology
temporal biodiversity
urban ecology
urban rivers
watersheds
title Temporal change in urban fish biodiversity—Gains, losses, and drivers of change
title_full Temporal change in urban fish biodiversity—Gains, losses, and drivers of change
title_fullStr Temporal change in urban fish biodiversity—Gains, losses, and drivers of change
title_full_unstemmed Temporal change in urban fish biodiversity—Gains, losses, and drivers of change
title_short Temporal change in urban fish biodiversity—Gains, losses, and drivers of change
title_sort temporal change in urban fish biodiversity gains losses and drivers of change
topic fish community ecology
freshwater ecology
temporal biodiversity
urban ecology
urban rivers
watersheds
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10845
work_keys_str_mv AT laurenlawson temporalchangeinurbanfishbiodiversitygainslossesanddriversofchange
AT christopherbedge temporalchangeinurbanfishbiodiversitygainslossesanddriversofchange
AT mariejoseefortin temporalchangeinurbanfishbiodiversitygainslossesanddriversofchange
AT donaldajackson temporalchangeinurbanfishbiodiversitygainslossesanddriversofchange