Temporal change in urban fish biodiversity—Gains, losses, and drivers of change
Abstract Our aim was to examine temporal change in alpha and beta diversity of freshwater fish communities in rivers that have urbanized over the same period to understand the influence of changes in land use and river connectivity on community change. We used biological (2001–2018), land use (2000–...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2024-02-01
|
Series: | Ecology and Evolution |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10845 |
_version_ | 1827572794196492288 |
---|---|
author | Lauren Lawson Christopher B. Edge Marie‐Josée Fortin Donald A. Jackson |
author_facet | Lauren Lawson Christopher B. Edge Marie‐Josée Fortin Donald A. Jackson |
author_sort | Lauren Lawson |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Our aim was to examine temporal change in alpha and beta diversity of freshwater fish communities in rivers that have urbanized over the same period to understand the influence of changes in land use and river connectivity on community change. We used biological (2001–2018), land use (2000–2015), and connectivity data (1987–2017) from Toronto, Ontario, Canada. We used linear mixed effects models to determine the strength of upstream land use, connectivity, and their changes over time to explain temporal change in alpha and beta diversity indices. We examined beta diversity using the temporal beta diversity index (TBI) to assess site‐specific community change. The TBI was partitioned into gains and losses, and species‐specific changes in abundance were assessed using paired t‐tests. There were more gains than losses across the study sites as measured by TBI. We found little to no significant differences in species‐specific abundances at aggregated spatial scales (study region, watershed, stream order). We found different relationships between landscape and connectivity variables with the biodiversity indices tested; however, almost all estimated confidence intervals overlapped with zero and had low goodness‐of‐fit. More fish biodiversity gains than losses were found across the study region, as measured by TBI. We found TBI to be a useful indicator of change as it identifies key sites to further investigate. We found two high value TBI sites gained non‐native species, and one site shifted from a cool‐water to warm‐water species dominated community, both of which have management implications. Upstream catchment land use and connectivity had poor explanatory power for change in the measured biodiversity indices. Ultimately, such spatial–temporal datasets are invaluable and can reveal trends in biodiversity useful for environmental management when considering competing interests involved with urban sprawl in the ongoing “Decade on Restoration.” |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T19:28:41Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-237bd4a8a97148389405c3395d33462c |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2045-7758 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T19:28:41Z |
publishDate | 2024-02-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Ecology and Evolution |
spelling | doaj.art-237bd4a8a97148389405c3395d33462c2024-02-29T08:56:39ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582024-02-01142n/an/a10.1002/ece3.10845Temporal change in urban fish biodiversity—Gains, losses, and drivers of changeLauren Lawson0Christopher B. Edge1Marie‐Josée Fortin2Donald A. Jackson3Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaNatural Resources Canada Canadian Forest Service Atlantic Forestry Center Fredericton New Brunswick CanadaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaAbstract Our aim was to examine temporal change in alpha and beta diversity of freshwater fish communities in rivers that have urbanized over the same period to understand the influence of changes in land use and river connectivity on community change. We used biological (2001–2018), land use (2000–2015), and connectivity data (1987–2017) from Toronto, Ontario, Canada. We used linear mixed effects models to determine the strength of upstream land use, connectivity, and their changes over time to explain temporal change in alpha and beta diversity indices. We examined beta diversity using the temporal beta diversity index (TBI) to assess site‐specific community change. The TBI was partitioned into gains and losses, and species‐specific changes in abundance were assessed using paired t‐tests. There were more gains than losses across the study sites as measured by TBI. We found little to no significant differences in species‐specific abundances at aggregated spatial scales (study region, watershed, stream order). We found different relationships between landscape and connectivity variables with the biodiversity indices tested; however, almost all estimated confidence intervals overlapped with zero and had low goodness‐of‐fit. More fish biodiversity gains than losses were found across the study region, as measured by TBI. We found TBI to be a useful indicator of change as it identifies key sites to further investigate. We found two high value TBI sites gained non‐native species, and one site shifted from a cool‐water to warm‐water species dominated community, both of which have management implications. Upstream catchment land use and connectivity had poor explanatory power for change in the measured biodiversity indices. Ultimately, such spatial–temporal datasets are invaluable and can reveal trends in biodiversity useful for environmental management when considering competing interests involved with urban sprawl in the ongoing “Decade on Restoration.”https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10845fish community ecologyfreshwater ecologytemporal biodiversityurban ecologyurban riverswatersheds |
spellingShingle | Lauren Lawson Christopher B. Edge Marie‐Josée Fortin Donald A. Jackson Temporal change in urban fish biodiversity—Gains, losses, and drivers of change Ecology and Evolution fish community ecology freshwater ecology temporal biodiversity urban ecology urban rivers watersheds |
title | Temporal change in urban fish biodiversity—Gains, losses, and drivers of change |
title_full | Temporal change in urban fish biodiversity—Gains, losses, and drivers of change |
title_fullStr | Temporal change in urban fish biodiversity—Gains, losses, and drivers of change |
title_full_unstemmed | Temporal change in urban fish biodiversity—Gains, losses, and drivers of change |
title_short | Temporal change in urban fish biodiversity—Gains, losses, and drivers of change |
title_sort | temporal change in urban fish biodiversity gains losses and drivers of change |
topic | fish community ecology freshwater ecology temporal biodiversity urban ecology urban rivers watersheds |
url | https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10845 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laurenlawson temporalchangeinurbanfishbiodiversitygainslossesanddriversofchange AT christopherbedge temporalchangeinurbanfishbiodiversitygainslossesanddriversofchange AT mariejoseefortin temporalchangeinurbanfishbiodiversitygainslossesanddriversofchange AT donaldajackson temporalchangeinurbanfishbiodiversitygainslossesanddriversofchange |